1172 
2291本文结合管理研究现状及其中的问题，指出基于现象的研究是实现高质量研究成果的重要方式之一。在剖析基于现象的研究的定义、范畴、类型与底层逻辑的基础上，本文提出基于现象的研究的逻辑推理过程，结合具有不同推理逻辑的典型论文，探析基于现象的研究的不同类型，并研讨具体研究范式与技术路线选择。本文系统且全面地探究了基于现象的研究，为从真实有效的现象出发“重启”高质量管理研究提供有意义的启示和指导。
基于现象的研究：内涵、路径与方法
摘要
参考文献
1 彼得•德鲁克著, 齐若兰译. 管理的实践[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2006.
2 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000.
3 董韫韬. 现象驱动型管理研究[J]. 管理学季刊, 2024, (1): 12-19.
4 亨利•明茨伯格著, 方海萍译. 管理工作的本质[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2024.
5 洪永淼, 汪寿阳. 大数据如何改变经济学研究范式?[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(10): 40-55,72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.10.004
6 牛美丽. 公共行政学观照下的定性研究方法[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 46(3): 76-79. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9639.2006.03.017
7 任兵, 楚耀. 中国管理学研究情境化的概念、内涵和路径[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(3): 330-336. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.03.003
8 盛昭瀚. 问题导向: 管理理论发展的推动力[J]. 管理科学学报, 2019, 22(5): 1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2019.05.002
9 托马斯•库恩著, 金吾伦, 胡新和译. 科学革命的结构[M]. 4版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
10 魏航, 郑迎迎, 陈静. ChatGPT对商科的挑战与机遇[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(9): 69-78.
11 姚小涛. 管理田野笔谈: 开展中国管理理论研究的探索与思考[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2023.
12 姚小涛. 组织理论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2024.
13 曾荣光著, 任兵, 袁庆宏译. 管理研究哲学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2020.
14 张存建. 解释自然类: 依据自然齐一性回应归纳问题的理论基础[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2020, 42(2): 23-28.
15 周寅猛, 付诗涵, 庄鹏冲. 从“理论驱动”到“问题驱动”——中国企业国际化战略的研究范式转变[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2012, (12): 76-80.
16 Cheng J L C. Critical issues in international management research: An agenda for future advancement[J]. European Journal of International Management, 2007, 1(1-2): 23-38.
17 Colquitt J A, Zapata-Phelan C P. Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1281-1303. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28165855
18 Cotteleer M J, Wan X. Does the starting point matter? The literature-driven and the phenomenon-driven approaches of using corporate archival data in academic research[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2016, 37(1): 26-33. DOI:10.1111/jbl.12114
19 Cyert R M, March J G. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
20 Daft R L, Lewin A Y. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay[J]. Organization Science, 1990, 1(1): 1-9. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1.1.1
21 Daft R L, Lewin A Y. Perspective—Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution[J]. Organization Science, 2008, 19(1): 177-183. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0346
22 Dane E. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(4): 579-603.
23 Delmestri G, Greenwood R. How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016, 61(4): 507-550. DOI:10.1177/0001839216644253
24 Doh J P. From the Editor: Why we need phenomenon-based research in international business[J]. Journal of World Business, 2015, 50(4): 609-611. DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.002
25 Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 532-550. DOI:10.2307/258557
26 Fisher G, Mayer K, Morris S. From the editors—Phenomenon-based theorizing[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(4): 631-639. DOI:10.5465/amr.2021.0320
27 Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
28 Geertz C. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
29 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31. DOI:10.1177/1094428112452151
30 Graebner M E, Knott A M, Lieberman M B, et al. Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question-driven, phenomenon-based approach to strategic management research[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(1): 3-10. DOI:10.1002/smj.3393
31 Hambrick D C. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1346-1352. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28166119
32 Hartshorne C, Weiss P. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.
33 Kanze D, Huang L, Conley M A, et al. We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(2): 586-614. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.1215
34 Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4): 691-710. DOI:10.2307/259349
35 Lawrence P R. The challenge of problem-oriented research[J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1992, 1(2): 139-142. DOI:10.1177/105649269212007
36 Leung K, Friedman R, Chen C C. Special issue on leveraging phenomenon-based research in China for theory advancement[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2013, 122(2): 305-306. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.004
37 Li F. Why have all western internet firms (WIFs) failed in China? A phenomenon-based study[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2019, 5(1): 13-37. DOI:10.5465/amd.2017.0102
38 Lumineau F, Kong D T, Dries N. A roadmap for navigating phenomenon-based research in management[J]. Journal of Management, 2024, 51(2): 505-517.
39 Lumineau F, Wang W Q, Schilke O. Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations?[J]. Organization Science, 2021, 32(2): 500-521. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2020.1379
40 Maass W, Parsons J, Purao S, et al. Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 19(12): 1253-1273.
41 Marsh D, Stoker G. Theory and methods in political science[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
42 McNamara G, Schleicher D J. What constitutes a contribution at JOM?[J]. Journal of Management, 2024, 50(5): 1495-1501. DOI:10.1177/01492063241238701
43 Ployhart R E, Bartunek J M. Editors’ comments: There is nothing so theoretical as good practice—A call for phenomenal theory[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2019, 44(3): 493-497. DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0087
44 Popper K R. The propensity interpretation of probability[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1959, 10(37): 25-42. DOI:10.1093/bjps/X.37.25
45 Rynes S L. Afterword: To the next 50 years[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1379-1383. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28166146
46 Sætre A S, Van de Ven A. Generating theory by abduction[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(4): 684-701. DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0233
47 Schwarz G, Stensaker I. Time to take off the theoretical straightjacket and (re-) introduce phenomenon-driven research[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2014, 50(4): 478-501. DOI:10.1177/0021886314549919
48 Schwarz G M, Stensaker I G. Showcasing phenomenon-driven research on organizational change[J]. Journal of Change Management, 2016, 16(4): 245-264. DOI:10.1080/14697017.2016.1230931
49 Siggelkow N. Persuasion with case studies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 20-24. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
50 Suddaby R, Hardy C, Huy Q N. Introduction to special topic forum: Where are the new theories of organization?[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(2): 236-246.
51 Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
52 Uzunca B, Cassiman B. Entry diversion: Deterrence by diverting submarket entry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(1): 11-47. DOI:10.1002/smj.3128
53 Van de Ven A H. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 486-489. DOI:10.5465/amr.1989.4308370
54 Vermeulen F. “I shall not remain insignificant”: Adding a second loop to matter more[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4): 754-761. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.26279167
55 von Krogh G, Rossi-Lamastra C, Haefliger S. Phenomenon-based research in management and organisation science: When is it rigorous and does it matter?[J]. Long Range Planning, 2012, 45(4): 277-298. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001
56 Walsh J P, Meyer A D, Schoonhoven C B. A future for organization theory: Living in and living with changing organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2006, 17(5): 657-671. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1060.0215
57 Yang J Y, Li J T, Delios A. Will a second mouse get the cheese? Learning from early entrants’ failures in a foreign market[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(3): 908-922. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2015.0967
引用本文
姚小涛, 苟佳怡. 基于现象的研究：内涵、路径与方法[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(12): 135-151.
导出参考文献，格式为：
