制度逻辑与制度多元性研究前沿探析与未来研究展望
9481 
993
外国经济与管理 2013 年 第 35 卷第 12 期, 页码：2 - 10
摘要
参考文献
摘要
传统的新制度理论提出的组织场域同构化观点日益受到组织理论学者们的质疑。制度逻辑理论以及由此产生的制度多元性概念对制度约束下的组织异质性行为进行了更加令人信服的解释,因而已成为制度理论学者近来极为关注的前沿问题。本文从制度逻辑和制度多元性概念的内涵界定、制度多元性塑造组织异质性行为、制度逻辑作为制度创业前因以及组织场域制度逻辑演变过程等方面,对现有的相关研究进行了系统述评。最后,本文剖析了已有文献仍存在的不足,并对未来相关研究进行了展望。
[1]Alford R R and Friedland R.Powers of theory:Capitalism,the state,and democracy[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
[2]Battilana J,et al.How actors change institutions:Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship[J].Academy of Management Annals,2009,3(1):65-107.
[3]Davis G F,et al.Social movements and organization theory[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[4]Du Y Z and Aldrich H E.Institutional pluralism and new venture growth in China:A three way interaction[R].Academy of Management Conference held in Orlando,USA on August 9-13,2013.
[5]DiMaggio P J and Powell W W.The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[6]DiMaggio P J and Powell W W.Introduction in the new institutionalism in organizational analysis[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press 1991.
[7]Dunn M B and Jones C.Institutional logics and institutional pluralism:The contestation of care and science logics in medical education,1967-2005[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55(1):114-149.
[8]Friedland R and Alford R.Bringing society back in:Symbols,practices and institutional contradictions[A].Powell W W and DiMaggio P J(Eds.).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991:232-263.
[9]Garud R,et al.Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency:An introduction to the special issue[J].Organization Studies,2007,28(7):957-969.
[10]Greenwood R and Suddaby R.Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields:The big five accounting firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):27-48.
[11]Haveman H and Rao H.Structuring a theory of moral sentiments:Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry[J].American Journal of Sociology,1997,102(6):1606-1651.
[12]Lawrence T B and Suddaby R.Institutions and institutional work[A].Clegg S R(Ed.).Handbook of organization studies[C].(2nd Ed.).London:Sage,2006.
[13]Leblebici H,et al.Institutional change and the transformation of inter-organizational fields:An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(3):333-363.
[14]Lepoutre J and Valente M.Fools breaking out:The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):285-313.
[15]Li H Y and Zhang Y.The role of managers’political networking and functional experience in new venture performance:Evidence from China’s transition economy[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(8):791-804.
[16]Lock J.Institutional logics as identity projects[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1305-1335.
[17]Lounsbury M.A tale of two cities:Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):289-307.
[18]MacLean T L and Behnam M.The dangers of decoupling:The relationship between compliance programs,legitimacy perceptions,and institutionalized misconduct[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1499-1520.
[19]Maguire S,et al.Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields:HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):657-679.
[20]Marquis C and Lounsbury M.Vive la resistance:Competing logics and the consolidation of U S community banking[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):799-820.
[21]Meyer J and Rowan B.Institutional organizations:Formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):340-363.
[22]Misangyi V F,et al.Ending corruption:The interplay among institutional logics,resources,and institutional entrepreneurs[J].Academy of Management Review,2008,33(3):750-770.
[23]Ocasio W.Toward an attention-based view of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(S.S.I.):187-206.
[24]Peng M W.Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296.
[25]Purdy J M and Gray B.Conflicting logics,mechanisms of diffusion,and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):355-380.
[26]Seo M and Creed D W E.Institutional contradictions,praxis and institutional change:A dialectical perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):222-247.
[27]Souitaris V,et al.Which iron cage?Endo-and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):477-505.
[28]Stinchcombe A L.Organizations and social structure[A].March J(Eds.).Handbook of organizations[C].Chicago:Rand-McNally,1965:140-200.
[29]Thornton P H and Ocasio W.Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations:Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry,1958-1990[J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,105(3):801-843.
[30]Thornton P H.The rise of the corporation in a craft industry:Conflict and conformity in institutional logics[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):81-101.
[31]Thornton P H.Markets from culture:Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing[M].Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,2004.
[32]Thornton P H and Ocasio W.Institutional logics[A].Greenwood C,et al(Eds.).The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008:99-129.
[33]Thornton P H,et al.The institutional logics perspective:A new approach to culture,structure,and process[M].London:Oxford University Press,2012.
[34]Westphal J D and Zajac E J.Decoupling policy from practice:The case of stock repurchase programs[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,46(2):202-228.
[35]Zimmerman M and Zeitz G.Beyond survival:Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):414-431.
[36]Zott C and Huy Q N.How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1):70-105.
[37]Zucker L G.The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence[J].American Sociological Review,1977,42(5):726-743.
①本文中的“传统的新制度理论”是指早期不同于制度逻辑与制度多元性理论的新制度理论。之所以用“传统”主要是为了强调两者之间的区别。
②制度多元性是由制度逻辑理论发展起来的一个重要概念,它描述了多种制度逻辑长期共存并相互竞争与互动这一多重制度逻辑现象,主要探究多种逻辑演化的规律及其对于组织和个人行为的影响。
③家族逻辑指个人或组织的行为按照“家”的观念行事,把社会关系视为类似家族内部的亲属关系或血缘关系,从而表现出尊卑有别、长幼有序、相互扶持等非市场化行为倾向。
④象征性行为(symbolic behavior)是指在制度框架的约束下,组织为了获得合法性而采取迎合现行制度的符号性行为和表现,通常以牺牲组织利益和效率为代价。实质性行为(substantial behavior)是指组织为了追求利益和效率而实际采取的具体行为,如改变组织结构等。
[2]Battilana J,et al.How actors change institutions:Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship[J].Academy of Management Annals,2009,3(1):65-107.
[3]Davis G F,et al.Social movements and organization theory[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[4]Du Y Z and Aldrich H E.Institutional pluralism and new venture growth in China:A three way interaction[R].Academy of Management Conference held in Orlando,USA on August 9-13,2013.
[5]DiMaggio P J and Powell W W.The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J].American Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
[6]DiMaggio P J and Powell W W.Introduction in the new institutionalism in organizational analysis[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press 1991.
[7]Dunn M B and Jones C.Institutional logics and institutional pluralism:The contestation of care and science logics in medical education,1967-2005[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2010,55(1):114-149.
[8]Friedland R and Alford R.Bringing society back in:Symbols,practices and institutional contradictions[A].Powell W W and DiMaggio P J(Eds.).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1991:232-263.
[9]Garud R,et al.Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency:An introduction to the special issue[J].Organization Studies,2007,28(7):957-969.
[10]Greenwood R and Suddaby R.Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields:The big five accounting firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1):27-48.
[11]Haveman H and Rao H.Structuring a theory of moral sentiments:Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry[J].American Journal of Sociology,1997,102(6):1606-1651.
[12]Lawrence T B and Suddaby R.Institutions and institutional work[A].Clegg S R(Ed.).Handbook of organization studies[C].(2nd Ed.).London:Sage,2006.
[13]Leblebici H,et al.Institutional change and the transformation of inter-organizational fields:An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(3):333-363.
[14]Lepoutre J and Valente M.Fools breaking out:The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):285-313.
[15]Li H Y and Zhang Y.The role of managers’political networking and functional experience in new venture performance:Evidence from China’s transition economy[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(8):791-804.
[16]Lock J.Institutional logics as identity projects[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1305-1335.
[17]Lounsbury M.A tale of two cities:Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):289-307.
[18]MacLean T L and Behnam M.The dangers of decoupling:The relationship between compliance programs,legitimacy perceptions,and institutionalized misconduct[J].Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(6):1499-1520.
[19]Maguire S,et al.Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields:HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):657-679.
[20]Marquis C and Lounsbury M.Vive la resistance:Competing logics and the consolidation of U S community banking[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):799-820.
[21]Meyer J and Rowan B.Institutional organizations:Formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology,1977,83(2):340-363.
[22]Misangyi V F,et al.Ending corruption:The interplay among institutional logics,resources,and institutional entrepreneurs[J].Academy of Management Review,2008,33(3):750-770.
[23]Ocasio W.Toward an attention-based view of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(S.S.I.):187-206.
[24]Peng M W.Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296.
[25]Purdy J M and Gray B.Conflicting logics,mechanisms of diffusion,and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):355-380.
[26]Seo M and Creed D W E.Institutional contradictions,praxis and institutional change:A dialectical perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):222-247.
[27]Souitaris V,et al.Which iron cage?Endo-and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(2):477-505.
[28]Stinchcombe A L.Organizations and social structure[A].March J(Eds.).Handbook of organizations[C].Chicago:Rand-McNally,1965:140-200.
[29]Thornton P H and Ocasio W.Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations:Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry,1958-1990[J].American Journal of Sociology,1999,105(3):801-843.
[30]Thornton P H.The rise of the corporation in a craft industry:Conflict and conformity in institutional logics[J].Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(1):81-101.
[31]Thornton P H.Markets from culture:Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing[M].Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,2004.
[32]Thornton P H and Ocasio W.Institutional logics[A].Greenwood C,et al(Eds.).The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism[C].London:Sage,2008:99-129.
[33]Thornton P H,et al.The institutional logics perspective:A new approach to culture,structure,and process[M].London:Oxford University Press,2012.
[34]Westphal J D and Zajac E J.Decoupling policy from practice:The case of stock repurchase programs[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,46(2):202-228.
[35]Zimmerman M and Zeitz G.Beyond survival:Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):414-431.
[36]Zott C and Huy Q N.How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2007,52(1):70-105.
[37]Zucker L G.The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence[J].American Sociological Review,1977,42(5):726-743.
①本文中的“传统的新制度理论”是指早期不同于制度逻辑与制度多元性理论的新制度理论。之所以用“传统”主要是为了强调两者之间的区别。
②制度多元性是由制度逻辑理论发展起来的一个重要概念,它描述了多种制度逻辑长期共存并相互竞争与互动这一多重制度逻辑现象,主要探究多种逻辑演化的规律及其对于组织和个人行为的影响。
③家族逻辑指个人或组织的行为按照“家”的观念行事,把社会关系视为类似家族内部的亲属关系或血缘关系,从而表现出尊卑有别、长幼有序、相互扶持等非市场化行为倾向。
④象征性行为(symbolic behavior)是指在制度框架的约束下,组织为了获得合法性而采取迎合现行制度的符号性行为和表现,通常以牺牲组织利益和效率为代价。实质性行为(substantial behavior)是指组织为了追求利益和效率而实际采取的具体行为,如改变组织结构等。
引用本文
杜运周, 尤树洋. 制度逻辑与制度多元性研究前沿探析与未来研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013, 35(12): 2–10.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：创业警觉研究前沿探析与未来展望
