组织响应制度复杂性：分析框架与研究模型 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

4 李晓丹, 刘洋. 制度复杂理论研究进展及对中国管理研究的启示[J]. 管理学报, 2015,（12）: 1741–1753. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.12.003

5 陆亚东. 中国管理学理论研究的窘境与未来[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015,（3）: 3–15.

6 陆亚东, 孙金云, 武亚军. " 合”理论——基于东方文化背景的战略理论新范式[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015,（6）: 3–25.

7 苏敬勤, 刘畅. 中国企业外部情境架构构建与研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016,（3）: 3–18.

8 涂智苹, 宋铁波. 制度压力下企业战略反应研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016,（11）: 101–114.

9 魏江, 王诗翔, 杨洋. 向谁同构? 中国跨国企业海外子公司对制度双元的响应[J]. 管理世界, 2016,（10）: 134–149.

10 Battilana J, Dorado S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53（6）: 1419–1440. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391

11 Binder A. For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics[J]. Theory and Society, 2007, 36（6）: 547–571. DOI:10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x

12 Boxenbaum E, Jonsson S. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, et al. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[C]. London: SAGE, 2008: 78–98.

13 Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D. Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016, 61（3）: 347–392. DOI:10.1177/0001839216636103

14 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48（2）: 147–160. DOI:10.2307/2095101

15 Faulconbridge J, Muzio D. Global professional service firms and the challenge of institutional complexity: ‘Field relocation’ as a response strategy[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53（1）: 89–124. DOI:10.1111/joms.12122

16 Goodrick E, Salancik G R. Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41（1）: 1–28.

17 Granqvist N, Gustafsson R. Temporal institutional work[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59（3）: 1009–1035. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0416

18 Greenwood R, Díaz A M, Li S X, et al. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21（2）: 521–539. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0453

19 Greenwood R, Hinings C R, Whetten D. Rethinking institutions and organizations[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2014, 51（7）: 1206–1220.

20 Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, et al. Institutional complexity and organizational responses[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5（1）: 317–371. DOI:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299

21 Heimer C A. Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care[J]. Law and Society Review, 1999, 33（1）: 17–66. DOI:10.2307/3115095

22 Jarzabkowski P, Smets M, Bednarek R, et al. Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice[A]. Lounsbury M, Boxenbaum E. Institutional logics in action[C]. Bingley: Emerald, 2013: 37–61.

23 Kodeih F, Greenwood R. Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity[J]. Organization Studies, 2014, 35（1）: 7–39. DOI:10.1177/0170840613495333

24 Luo X W, Wang D Q, Zhang J J. Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60（1）: 321–344. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0847

25 Meyer R E, Höllerer M A. Laying a smoke screen: Ambiguity and neutralization as strategic responses to intra-institutional complexity[J]. Strategic Organization, 2016, 14（4）: 373–406. DOI:10.1177/1476127016633335

26 Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16（1）: 145–179. DOI:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002

27 Pache A C, Santos F. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35（3）: 455–476.

28 Raaijmakers A G M. Take care! Responding to institutional complexity in Dutch childcare[M]. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint, 2013.

29 Raaijmakers A G M, Vermeulen P A M, Meeus M T H, et al. I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58（1）: 85–110. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0276

30 Reay T, Hinings C R. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics[J]. Organization Studies, 2009, 30（6）: 629–652. DOI:10.1177/0170840609104803

31 Smets M, Jarzabkowski P, Burke G T, et al. Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58（3）: 932–970. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0638

32 Smets M, Morris T I M, Greenwood R. From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55（4）: 877–904. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0013

33 Thornton P H, Lounsbury M, Ocasio W. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

34 Thornton P H, Ocasio W. Institutional logics[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, et al. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[C]. London: SAGE, 2008: 99–129.

35 Vermeulen P, Zietsma C, Greenwood R, et al. Special issue of strategic organization: " Strategic responses to institutional complexity”[J]. Strategic Organization, 2014, 12（1）: 79–82.

36 Vermeulen P, Zietsma C, Greenwood R, et al. Strategic responses to institutional complexity[J]. Strategic Organization, 2016, 14（4）: 277–286. DOI:10.1177/1476127016675997