创业非正式投资不可避免地受到多重制度的共同影响,现有研究仍局限于单一制度前因的考察。基于不同收入水平的国家创业非正式投资活动的观察,本文以制度逻辑理论为基础构建了政府、市场和社会的多元制度协同框架,并以47个国家为案例,研究激发创业非正式投资的多重并发制度因素和因果复杂机制,及其在不同经济收入水平国家中的差异化表现。研究发现:单一制度要素并不构成高创业非正式投资的必要条件,但创业文化在所有制度组态中同时出现,表明支持创业的社会文化规范对创业非正式投资具有普适性的积极作用。高非正式投资有3种驱动路径,其中“多元制度逻辑混合主导”和“政府主导型市场—社会协同驱动”反映了政府、市场和社会三者相互补充、共同作用于创业非正式投资;“社会主导型市场驱动”表明在缺乏正式制度支持时,社会制度发挥替代功能主导着非正式投资的激活路径。高创业非正式投资的制度组态在不同经济收入水平国家中具有显著差异,中低收入国家中社会逻辑对于创业非正式投资产生关键影响,但其重要性随着收入水平的提高而减弱,政府逻辑在高收入水平国家中的重要性增加并占据主导地位。本文深化了创业非正式投资的制度复杂性研究,也为政府、市场和社会协奏激发创业非正式投资提供实践启示。
制度组态视角下创业非正式投资提升的多元路径研究
摘要
参考文献
1 蔡栋梁, 邱黎源, 孟晓雨, 等. 流动性约束、社会资本与家庭创业选择——基于CHFS数据的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(9): 79-94. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.09.008
4 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.09.010
6 冯冰, 杨敏利, 郭立宏. 政府引导基金投资对创业企业后续融资的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 112-124.
7 盖凯程. 引导民间资本融入创新创业[J]. 财经科学, 2015, (12): 5-7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8306.2015.12.005
8 贾建锋, 刘伟鹏, 杜运周, 等. 制度组态视角下绿色技术创新效率提升的多元路径[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2): 51-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2024.02.006
9 解学梅, 韩宇航. 本土制造业企业如何在绿色创新中实现“华丽转型”?——基于注意力基础观的多案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(3): 76-105. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.03.006
11 李新春, 叶文平, 唐嘉宏, 等. 创始爱心资金获取: 情感信任还是能力信任[J]. 管理科学, 2015, 28(2): 40-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2015.02.004
13 马光荣, 杨恩艳. 社会网络、非正规金融与创业[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(3): 83-94.
14 迈克尔•希特, 徐凯著, 钟莹译. 制度与创业战略[J]. 管理学季刊, 2019, 4(2): 1-14,130.
15 彭维刚. 制度转型、企业成长和制度基础观[J]. 管理学季刊, 2018, 3(1): 1-19.
16 邱姝敏, 高雨辰, 柳卸林, 等. 外部企业股东与学术衍生企业的技术市场化: 基于制度逻辑视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(12): 185-200.
19 吴丹红, 王德发, 杨元. 制度复杂性与企业社会责任报告策略反应——基于多元制度逻辑的视角[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (8): 68-82.
20 杨俊, 牛梦茜. 制度如何影响创业: 一个跨层次的分析框架[J]. 管理学季刊, 2019, 4(2): 26-33,132.
21 杨灵, 王晓瑜, 陈劲. 基于制度逻辑理论视角的创业理论文献综述[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(7): 95-104. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1952.2022.7.glpl202207009
22 杨敏利, 李昕芳, 仵永恒. 政府创业投资引导基金的引导效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11): 8-16.
23 于淼, 李亚欣, 朱方伟, 等. 转型经济背景下的大企业战略性内部创业与制度逻辑变迁: 一个共演模型[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(3): 161-179.
24 张来明. 中等收入国家成长为高收入国家的基本做法与思考[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(2): 1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.02.002
25 郑馨, 安雯雯, 鲍舒琴. 穿越衰退与繁荣: 复杂制度组态如何激发高成长型创业[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28(4): 60-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2025.04.008
26 郑馨, 周先波, 陈宏辉, 等. 东山再起: 怎样的国家制度设计能够促进失败再创业?——基于56个国家7年混合数据的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 136-151,181. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.07.012
27 Acs Z J, Desai S, Hessels J. Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions[J]. Small Business Economics, 2008, 31(3): 219-234. DOI:10.1007/s11187-008-9135-9
28 Audretsch D B. Entrepreneurship and culture[J]. Eurasian Economic Review, 2020, 10(1): 1-8.
29 Autio E, Pathak S, Wennberg K. Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2013, 44(4): 334-362. DOI:10.1057/jibs.2013.15
30 Bosma N, Hill S, Ionescu-Somers A, et al. Global entrepreneurship monitor 2019/2020 global report[R]. 2020. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/50443.
31 Brander J A, Du Q Q, Hellmann T. The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: International evidence[J]. Review of Finance, 2015, 19(2): 571-618. DOI:10.1093/rof/rfu009
32 Burke A, van Stel A, Hartog C, et al. What determines the level of informal venture finance investment? Market clearing forces and gender effects[J]. Small Business Economics, 2014, 42(3): 467-484. DOI:10.1007/s11187-013-9518-4
33 Cumming D, Zhang M J. Angel investors around the world[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50(5): 692-719. DOI:10.1057/s41267-018-0178-0
34 Cumming D, Zhang M J. Bankruptcy law and angel investors around the world[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2023, 54(7): 1256-1277. DOI:10.1057/s41267-023-00627-w
35 Cumming D J, MacIntosh J G. Crowding out private equity: Canadian evidence[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(5): 569-609. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.002
36 Danis W M, De Clercq D, Petricevic O. Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension[J]. International Business Review, 2011, 20(4): 394-408. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.08.005
37 Ding Z J, Au K, Chiang F. Social trust and angel investors’ decisions: A multilevel analysis across nations[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2015, 30(2): 307-321. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.003
38 Du Y Z, Liu Q C, Kim P H, et al. Riding the waves of change: Using qualitative comparative analysis to analyze complex growth patterns in entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2025, 49(1): 312-353. DOI:10.1177/10422587241249330
39 Dul J, Van der Laan E, Kuik R. A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2020, 23(2): 385-395. DOI:10.1177/1094428118795272
40 Elston J A, Chen S, Weidinger A. The role of informal capital on new venture formation and growth in China[J]. Small Business Economics, 2016, 46(1): 79-91. DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9674-9
41 Fernandez V. Micro-angel investments of men and women: The role of institutions[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2024, 70: 102378. DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102378
42 Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
43 Furnari S, Crilly D, Misangyi V F, et al. Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(4): 778-799. DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0298
44 Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, et al. Institutional complexity and organizational responses[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1): 317-371. DOI:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
45 Hill S, Ionescu-Somers A, Coduras M A, et al. GEM 2023/2024 global report-25 years and growing[R]. 2024. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/51377.
46 Li C H, Shi Y L, Wu C, et al. Policies of promoting entrepreneurship and angel investment: Evidence from China[J]. Emerging Markets Review, 2016, 29: 154-167. DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.011
47 Linder C, Moulick A G, Lechner C. Necessary conditions and theory-method compatibility in quantitative entrepreneurship research[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2023, 47(5): 1971-1994. DOI:10.1177/10422587221102103
48 Mason C M. Public policy support for the informal venture capital market in Europe: A critical review[J]. International Small Business Journal, 2009, 27(5): 536-556. DOI:10.1177/0266242609338754
49 Maxwell A L, Lévesque M. Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38(5): 1057-1080. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00475.x
50 Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242-266. DOI:10.2307/259373
51 Park Y, Fiss P C, El Sawy O A. Theorizing the multiplicity of digital phenomena: The ecology of configurations, causal recipes, and guidelines for applying QCA[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2020, 44(4): 1493-1520. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879
52 Peng M W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 275-296. DOI:10.2307/30040713
53 Perry J, Chand M, Ring K. Cultural influences in the decision to invest in new ventures: An exploratory study[J]. Venture Capital, 2015, 17(3): 237-262. DOI:10.1080/13691066.2015.1051738
54 Pinto-Gutierrez C, Romaní G, Atienza M. The effect of formal financial accessibility on love money investment[J]. European Business Review, 2023, 35(2): 121-136. DOI:10.1108/EBR-10-2022-0210
55 Qin F, Mickiewicz T, Estrin S. Homophily and peer influence in early-stage new venture informal investment[J]. Small Business Economics, 2022, 59(1): 93-116. DOI:10.1007/s11187-021-00523-3
56 Scott W R. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities[M]. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2013.
57 Shane S, Drover W, Clingingsmith D, et al. Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2020, 35(4): 105949. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105949
58 Zhao E Y, Lounsbury M. An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2016, 31(6): 643-662. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.001
引用本文
卢启程, 荣斌, 陈琪, 等. 制度组态视角下创业非正式投资提升的多元路径研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(11): 64-81.
导出参考文献,格式为:





597
543
