组织管理中的人工智能决策：述评与展望 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 高记, 冯婧雯. 不利结果下算法决策对员工公平感的双刃剑效应: 基于归因理论的视角[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2024, 41(5): 36-53.

2 蒋路远, 曹李梅, 秦昕, 等. 人工智能决策的公平感知[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1078-1092.

3 景怡. 算法态度文献综述、研究框架和未来展望[J]. 华东经济管理, 2023, 37(5): 107-118.

4 孔祥维, 唐鑫泽, 王子明. 人工智能决策可解释性的研究综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(2): 524-536.

5 罗映宇, 朱国玮, 钱无忌, 等. 人工智能时代的算法厌恶: 研究框架与未来展望[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(10): 205-227.

6 裴嘉良, 刘善仕, 钟楚燕, 等. AI算法决策能提高员工的程序公平感知吗?[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(11): 41-55.

7 孙羽佳, 苏凇, 唐红红. 基于信任视角的消费者算法态度研究述评与展望[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(10): 188-208.

8 魏昕, 黄鸣鹏, 李欣悦. 算法决策、员工公平感与偏差行为: 决策有利性的调节作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(11): 56-69.

9 谢才凤, 邬家骅, 许丽颖, 等. 算法决策趋避的过程动机理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 60-77. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2023.1.xlxdt202301006

10 曾大军, 张柱, 梁嘉琦, 等. 机器行为与人机协同决策理论和方法[J]. 管理科学, 2021, b,34(6): 55-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2021.06.005

11 Alon-Barkat S, Busuioc M. Human–AI interactions in public sector decision making: “Automation bias” and “selective adherence” to algorithmic advice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2023, 33(1): 153-169. DOI:10.1093/jopart/muac007

12 Araujo T, Helberger N, Kruikemeier S, et al. In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence[J]. AI & Society, 2020, 35: 611-623.

13 Balasubramanian N, Ye Y, Xu M T. Substituting human decision-making with machine learning: Implications for organizational learning[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2022, 47(3): 448-465. DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0470

14 Bigman Y E, Yam K C, Marciano D, et al. Threat of racial and economic inequality increases preference for algorithm decision-making[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 122: 106859. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106859

15 Bonezzi A, Ostinelli M, Melzner J. The human black-box: The illusion of understanding human better than algorithmic decision-making[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2022, 151(9): 2250-2258. DOI:10.1037/xge0001181

16 Boyacı T, Canyakmaz C, de Véricourt F. Human and machine: The impact of machine input on decision making under cognitive limitations[J]. Management Science, 2023, 70(2): 1258-1275.

17 Cao G M, Duan Y Q, Edwards J S, et al. Understanding managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making[J]. Technovation, 2021, 106: 102312. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312

18 Costello A M, Down A K, Mehta M N. Machine + man: A field experiment on the role of discretion in augmenting AI-based lending models[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2020, 70(2-3): 101360. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101360

19 Dietvorst B J, Bartels D M. Consumers object to algorithms making morally relevant tradeoffs because of algorithms’ consequentialist decision strategies[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2022, 32(3): 406-424. DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1266

20 Duan Y Q, Edwards J S, Dwivedi Y K. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data – evolution, challenges and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 48: 63-71. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021

21 Dwivedi Y K, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy[J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 57: 101994. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

22 Fu R S, Aseri M, Singh P V, et al. “Un” fair machine learning algorithms[J]. Management Science, 2022, 68(6): 4173-4195. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4065

23 Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, et al. Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation[J]. Information Systems Research, 2022, 33(2): 678-696. DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.1079

24 Grimmelikhuijsen S. Explaining why the computer says no: Algorithmic transparency affects the perceived trustworthiness of automated decision-making[J]. Public Administration Review, 2023, 83(2): 241-262. DOI:10.1111/puar.13483

25 Haesevoets T, De Cremer D, Dierckx K, et al. Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 119: 106730. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730

26 Höddinghaus M, Sondern D, Hertel G. The automation of leadership functions: Would people trust decision algorithms?[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 116: 106635. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106635

27 Jarrahi M H. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making[J]. Business Horizons, 2018, 61(4): 577-586. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007

28 Jussupow E, Spohrer K, Heinzl A, et al. Augmenting medical diagnosis decisions? An investigation into physicians’ decision-making process with artificial intelligence[J]. Information Systems Research, 2021, 32(3): 713-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.2020.0980

29 Kawaguchi K. When will workers follow an algorithm? A field experiment with a retail business[J]. Management Science, 2021, 67(3): 1670-1695. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3599

30 Keding C, Meissner P. Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes: How the use of AI-based advisory systems shapes choice behavior in R&D investment decisions[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 171: 120970. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970

31 Langer M, König C J, Back C, et al. Trust in artificial intelligence: Comparing trust processes between human and automated trustees in light of unfair bias[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2023, 38(3): 493-508. DOI:10.1007/s10869-022-09829-9

32 Langer M, Landers R N. The future of artificial intelligence at work: A review on effects of decision automation and augmentation on workers targeted by algorithms and third-party observers[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 123: 106878. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106878

33 Lebovitz S, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Levina N. To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis[J]. Organization Science, 2022, 33(1): 126-148. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2021.1549

34 Lehmann C A, Haubitz C B, Fügener A, et al. The risk of algorithm transparency: How algorithm complexity drives the effects on the use of advice[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2022, 31(9): 3419-3434. DOI:10.1111/poms.13770

35 Leyer M, Schneider S. Decision augmentation and automation with artificial intelligence: Threat or opportunity for managers?[J]. Business Horizons, 2021, 64(5): 711-724. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.026

36 Liang H G, Xue Y J. Save face or save life: Physicians’ dilemma in using clinical decision support systems[J]. Information Systems Research, 2022, 33(2): 737-758. DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.1082

37 Logg J M, Minson J A, Moore D A. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2019, 151: 90-103. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

38 Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge C K. Resistance to medical artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2019, 46(4): 629-650. DOI:10.1093/jcr/ucz013

39 Luo X M, Tong S L, Fang Z, et al. Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases[J]. Marketing Science, 2019, 38(6): 913-1084.

40 Mahmud H, Islam A K M N, Ahmed S I, et al. What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 175: 121390. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390

41 Mahmud H, Islam A K M N, Mitra R K. What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 193: 122641. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122641

42 Mayer A S, Strich F, Fiedler M. Unintended consequences of introducing AI systems for decision making[J]. Mis Quarterly Executive, 2020, 19(4): 6.

43 Metcalf L, Askay D A, Rosenberg L B. Keeping humans in the loop: Pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision making[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61(4): 84-109. DOI:10.1177/0008125619862256

44 Park E H, Werder K, Cao L, et al. Why do family members reject AI in health care? Competing effects of emotions[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2022, 39(3): 765-792. DOI:10.1080/07421222.2022.2096550

45 Pietronudo M C, Croidieu G, Schiavone F. A solution looking for problems? A systematic literature review of the rationalizing influence of artificial intelligence on decision-making in innovation management[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 182: 121828. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121828

46 Raisch S, Krakowski S. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(1): 192-210. DOI:10.5465/amr.2018.0072

47 Saragih M, Morrison B W. The effect of past algorithmic performance and decision significance on algorithmic advice acceptance[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 38(13): 1228-1237. DOI:10.1080/10447318.2021.1990518

48 Sharma S, Islam N, Singh G, et al. Why do retail customers adopt artificial intelligence (AI) based autonomous decision-making systems?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024, 71: 1846-1861. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2022.3157976

49 Shrestha Y R, Ben-Menahem S M, von Krogh G. Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence[J]. California Management Review, 2019, 61(4): 66-83. DOI:10.1177/0008125619862257

50 Strich F, Mayer A S, Fiedler M. What do I do in a world of artificial intelligence? Investigating the impact of substitutive decision-making AI systems on employees' professional role identity[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2021, 22(2): 304-324. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00663

51 Sturm T, Pumplun L, Gerlach J P, et al. Machine learning advice in managerial decision-making: The overlooked role of decision makers’ advice utilization[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2023, 32(4): 101790. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101790

52 Sun J K, Zhang D J, Hu H Y, et al. Predicting human discretion to adjust algorithmic prescription: A large-scale field experiment in warehouse operations[J]. Management Science, 2022, 68(2): 846-865. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3990

53 Syam N, Sharma A. Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 69: 135-146. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019

54 Tang P M, Koopman J, McClean S T, et al. When conscientious employees meet intelligent machines: An integrative approach inspired by complementarity theory and role theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2022, 65(3): 1019-1054. DOI:10.5465/amj.2020.1516

55 Terziyan V, Gryshko S, Golovianko M. Patented intelligence: Cloning human decision models for industry 4.0[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2018, 48: 204-217. DOI:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.019

56 Tschandl P, Rinner C, Apalla Z, et al. Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition[J]. Nature Medicine, 2020, 26(8): 1229-1234. DOI:10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0

57 Vincent V U. Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making[J]. Business Horizons, 2021, 64(4): 425-438. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.008

58 Wesche J S, Sonderegger A. Repelled at first sight? Expectations and intentions of job-seekers reading about AI selection in job advertisements[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2021, 125: 106931. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106931

59 Westphal M, Vössing M, Satzger G, et al. Decision control and explanations in human-AI collaboration: Improving user perceptions and compliance[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, 144: 107714. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107714

60 Wu C, Zhang R, Kotagiri R, et al. Strategic decisions: Survey, taxonomy, and future directions from artificial intelligence perspective[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): 250.

61 Yam K C, Goh E Y, Fehr R, et al. When your boss is a robot: Workers are more spiteful to robot supervisors that seem more human[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2022, 102: 104360. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104360

62 Yan C F, Chen Q, Zhou X Y, et al. When the automated fire backfires: The adoption of algorithm-based hr decision-making could induce consumer’s unfavorable ethicality inferences of the company[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2024, 190(4): 841-859. DOI:10.1007/s10551-023-05351-x

63 You S, Yang C L, Li X T. Algorithmic versus human advice: Does presenting prediction performance matter for algorithm appreciation?[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2022, 39(2): 336-365. DOI:10.1080/07421222.2022.2063553

64 Young A D, Monroe A E. Autonomous morals: Inferences of mind predict acceptance of AI behavior in sacrificial moral dilemmas[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2019, 85: 103870. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103870

65 Yu S B, Xiong J, Shen H. The rise of chatbots: The effect of using chatbot agents on consumers' responses to request rejection[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2024, 34(1): 35-48. DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1330

66 Zhang Z X, Chen Z S, Xu L Y. Artificial intelligence and moral dilemmas: Perception of ethical decision-making in AI[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2022, 101: 104327. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104327

67 Zhou Y Y, Fei Z Y, He Y Q, et al. How human–chatbot interaction impairs charitable giving: The role of moral judgment[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 178(3): 849-865. DOI:10.1007/s10551-022-05045-w