数字经济时代下,跨学科研究正在将“生成性”发展成数字化创新领域的基石性概念。现有研究围绕生成性的研究议题众多,但整体研究框架尚不清晰,核心议题也不明确。本文以122篇数字化创新领域生成性的英文文献为研究对象,基于 LDA 主题模型聚合出20个主题,结合人工编码确定了内涵、前因、作用机制和产出结果4个核心研究内容,对此展开研究:(1)对不同学科和视角下生成性的内涵进行了梳理,提炼出数字化创新领域生成性概念的共性内涵;(2)从技术因素和社会因素两个方面梳理生成性的前因,对生成性的形成机理进行系统归纳;(3)基于“元亨利贞”分析框架阐释生成性对数字化创新的作用机制和产出结果,揭示生成性促进数字化创新的底层逻辑。同时,围绕生成性的内涵、前因、作用机制和产出结果,提出未来研究方向。本文对数字化创新领域的生成性文献进行了系统性归纳,并指出未来研究方向,能够为本领域的进一步研究提供文献基础和研究思路。
生成性:一个数字化创新的基石性概念评述
摘要
参考文献
1 曹鑫, 欧阳桃花, 黄江明. 智能互联产品重塑企业边界研究: 小米案例[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(4): 125-141.
2 焦媛媛, 高雪, 付轼辉. 同侪影响视角下创新社区中用户群体创新行为的形成机理研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(1): 165-176. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2022.01.017
3 刘洋, 董久钰, 魏江. 数字创新管理: 理论框架与未来研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(7): 198-217.
4 马鸿佳, 肖彬, 韩姝婷. 创业领域动态能力研究综述——基于LDA主题模型[J/OL]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20220624.1508.005.html, 2022-06-24.
5 Arazy O, Daxenberger J, Lifshitz-Assaf H, et al. Turbulent stability of emergent roles: The dualistic nature of self-organizing knowledge coproduction[J]. Information Systems Research, 2016, 27(4): 792-812. DOI:10.1287/isre.2016.0647
6 Arazy O, Lindberg A, Rezaei M, et al. The evolutionary trajectories of peer-produced artifacts: Group composition, the trajectories’ exploration, and the quality of artifacts[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2020, 44(4): 2013-2053. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/15379
7 Avital M, Te’eni D. From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2009, 19(4): 345-367. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00291.x
8 Baldwin C Y, Woodard C J. The architecture of platforms: A unified view[A]. Gawer A. Platforms, markets and innovation[M]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
9 Barbieri N, Marzucchi A, Rizzo U. Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(2): 103901. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103901
10 Bereznoy A, Meissner D, Scuotto V. The intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the digital platform based ecosystem. A conceptual study on the lens of the open innovation approach[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2021, 25(8): 2022-2042. DOI:10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0769
11 Boland R J, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(4): 631-647. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0304
12 Boudreau K J. Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software App developers and patterns of innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1409-1427. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678
13 Boudreau K. Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(10): 1849-1872. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
14 Carnabuci G, Operti E. Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(13): 1591-1613. DOI:10.1002/smj.2084
15 Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, et al. Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1): 217-243. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10
16 Ethiraj S K, Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 159-173. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0145
17 Faraj S, Jarvenpaa S L, Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1224-1239. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
18 Farrell H, Newman A L. Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion[J]. International Security, 2019, 44(1): 42-79. DOI:10.1162/isec_a_00351
19 Füller J, Hutter K, Wahl J, et al. How AI revolutionizes innovation management – Perceptions and implementation preferences of AI-based innovators[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 178: 121598. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121598
20 Gawer A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(7): 1239-1249. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
21 Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O. Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2013, 23(2): 173-192. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x
22 Haefner N, Wincent J, Parida V, et al. Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 162: 120392. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120392
23 Hannigan T R, Haans R F J, Vakili K, et al. Topic modeling in management research: Rendering new theory from textual data[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2019, 13(2): 586-632. DOI:10.5465/annals.2017.0099
24 Hanseth O, Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2010, 25(1): 1-19. DOI:10.1057/jit.2009.19
25 Henfridsson O, Bygstad B. The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(3): 907-931. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
26 Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu M J. Extending digital ventures through templating[J]. Information Systems Research, 2022, 33(1): 285-310. DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.1057
27 Hylving L, Schultze U. Accomplishing the layered modular architecture in digital innovation: The case of the car’s driver information module[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(3): 101621. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101621
28 Jacobides M G, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8): 2255-2276. DOI:10.1002/smj.2904
29 Jarvenpaa S, Standaert W. Digital probes as opening possibilities of generativity[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2018, 19(10): 982-1000.
30 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
31 Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103773. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
32 Namisango F, Kang K, Rehman J. Examining the relationship between sociomaterial practices enacted in the organizational use of social media and the emerging role of organizational generativity[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2023, 71: 102643. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102643
33 Ogink T, Dong J Q. Stimulating innovation by user feedback on social media: The case of an online user innovation community[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 144: 295-302. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.029
34 Paul J, Lim W M, O'Cass A, et al. Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR)[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2021, 45(4): O1-O16.
35 Payne A, Frow P, Eggert A. The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application in marketing[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2017, 45(4): 467-489. DOI:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z
36 Ramaswamy V, Ozcan K. Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2016, 33(1): 93-106. DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.001
37 Rossi M, Nandhakumar J, Mattila M. Balancing fluid and cemented routines in a digital workplace[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(2): 101616. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101616
38 Sakshi, Kukreja V. Recent trends in mathematical expressions recognition: An LDA-based analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213: 119028. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119028
39 Schwer K, Hitz C. Designing organizational structure in the age of digitization[J]. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 2018, 5(1): 1-11.
40 Simon H A. The architecture of complexity[J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 106(6): 467-482.
41 Sun S L, Chen V Z, Sunny S A, et al. Venture capital as an innovation ecosystem engineer in an emerging market[J]. International Business Review, 2019, 28(5): 101485. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.012
42 Sun Y, Zhong Q. How modularity influences product innovation: The mediating role of module suppliers’ relationship-specific investments[J]. Management Decision, 2020, 58(12): 2743-2761. DOI:10.1108/MD-06-2019-0837
43 Thomas L D W, Tee R. Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2022, 24(2): 255-278. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12277
44 Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary —Digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 748-759. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0318
45 Yoo Y, Boland R J, Lyytinen K, et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
46 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research Commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322
47 Yoo Y. The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 14(5): 227-236. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00334
48 Zittrain J L. The Generative Internet[J]. Harvard Law Review, 2006, 119(7): 1974-2040.
49 Zorina A, Dutton W H. Theorizing actor interactions shaping innovation in digital infrastructures: The case of residential Internet development in Belarus[J]. Organization Science, 2021, 32(1): 156-180. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2020.1389
引用本文
邹波, 李淑华, 孙黎, 等. 生成性:一个数字化创新的基石性概念评述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(7): 3-21.
导出参考文献,格式为: