2522 
2110作为领导有效性的基础以及影响员工行为绩效的重要因素，工作场所喜爱受到了组织管理学者越来越多的关注，但是国内该领域的研究还处于初步发展阶段，并且缺乏对现有文献的系统性梳理和归纳。鉴于此，本研究首先采用文献计量法对工作场所喜爱研究进行了可视化计量分析，在此基础上从概念内涵、测量工具、影响因素、影响效应和作用机制等方面对工作场所喜爱的研究现状进行了系统性的梳理，并构建了整合性研究框架，最后对该领域的未来研究方向进行了展望。本研究有助于促进对工作场所喜爱的深层次理解，并为国内工作场所喜爱的实证研究和实践应用提供参考。
工作场所喜爱：研究进展与未来展望
摘要
参考文献
11 Allen T D, Rush M C. The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83(2): 247-260. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.247
12 Bande B, Fernández-Ferrín P, Otero-Neira C, et al. Impression management tactics and performance ratings: A moderated-mediation framework[J]. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 2017, 24(1): 19-34. DOI:10.1080/1051712X.2016.1275817
13 Barnes C M, Guarana C L, Nauman S, et al. Too tired to inspire or be inspired: Sleep deprivation and charismatic leadership[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101(8): 1191-1199. DOI:10.1037/apl0000123
14 Berridge K, Winkielman P. What is an unconscious emotion?(The case for unconscious “liking”)[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2003, 17(2): 181-211. DOI:10.1080/02699930302289
15 Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto A M. The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(5): 792-807. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792
16 Bharanitharan D K, Lowe K B, Bahmannia S, et al. Seeing is not believing: Leader humility, hypocrisy, and their impact on followers’ behaviors[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2021, 32(2): 101440. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101440
17 Bolino M C, Varela J A, Bande B, et al. The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(3): 281-297. DOI:10.1002/job.379
18 Brief A P, Weiss H M. Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53: 279-307. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156
19 Brown D J, Keeping L M. Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2005, 16(2): 245-272. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003
20 Byrne D. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity[J]. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62(3): 713-715. DOI:10.1037/h0044721
21 Byrne D, Clore G L, Smeaton G. The attraction hypothesis: Do similar attitudes affect anything?[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1167-1170. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1167
22 Byrne D, Clore G L Jr, Worchel P. Effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4(2): 220-224. DOI:10.1037/h0023559
23 Casciaro T, Lobo M S. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53(4): 655-684. DOI:10.2189/asqu.53.4.655
24 Chen C M. CiteSpace Ⅱ: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377. DOI:10.1002/asi.20317
25 Chen X P, Chen C C. On the intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: A process model of Guanxi development[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2004, 21(3): 305-324. DOI:10.1023/B:APJM.0000036465.19102.d5
26 Cheng J T, Tracy J L, Foulsham T, et al. Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013, 104(1): 103-125. DOI:10.1037/a0030398
27 Chou S Y. Is there any cost of being helped? A theoretical analysis of interpersonal helping behavior recipients in Chinese organizations[J]. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2018, 23(4): 290-300. DOI:10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.12.004
28 Cialdini R B, Goldstein N J. Social influence: Compliance and conformity[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004, 55: 591-621. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
29 Cogliser C C, Schriesheim C A, Scandura T A, et al. Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader–member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20(3): 452-465. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.010
30 Commisso M, Finkelstein L. Physical attractiveness bias in employee termination[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, 42(12): 2968-2987. DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00970.x
31 Darioly A, Schmid Mast M. Facing an incompetent leader: The effects of a nonexpert leader on subordinates’ perception and behaviour[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 20(2): 239-265. DOI:10.1080/13594320903429576
32 Dasborough M T, Ashkanasy N M. Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(5): 615-634. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00147-9
33 Deng H, Walter F, Guan Y J. Supervisor-directed emotional labor as upward influence: An emotions-as-social-information perspective[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2020, 41(4): 384-402. DOI:10.1002/job.2424
34 Duan J Y, Xu Y, Wang X T, et al. Voice for oneself: Self-interested voice and its antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2021, 94(1): 1-28. DOI:10.1111/joop.12334
35 Dulebohn J H, Bommer W H, Liden R C, et al. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(6): 1715-1759. DOI:10.1177/0149206311415280
36 Dulebohn J H, Wu D Y, Liao C W. Does liking explain variance above and beyond LMX? A meta-analysis[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2017, 27(1): 149-166. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.008
37 Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, et al. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1): 42-51. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
38 Engle E M, Lord R G. Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(4): 988-1010. DOI:10.2307/256956
39 Erdogan B, Kraimer M L, Liden R C. Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct: An examination in the performance appraisal context[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2001, 37(2): 205-222. DOI:10.1177/0021886301372004
40 Ferris G R, Judge T A, Rowland K M, et al. Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, 58(1): 101-135. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1994.1030
41 Fiske S T. What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11(4): 123-128. DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.00183
42 Fiske S T, Cuddy A J C, Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007, 11(2): 77-83. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
43 Fiske S T, Xu J, Cuddy A C, et al. (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1999, 55(3): 473-489. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00128
45 Foulk T A, Long D M. Impressed by impression management: Newcomer reactions to ingratiated supervisors[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101(10): 1487-1497. DOI:10.1037/apl0000146
46 Fox S, Spector P E. Relations of emotional intelligence, practical intelligence, general intelligence, and trait affectivity with interview outcomes: It’s not all just ‘G’[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000, 21(2): 203-220. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<203::AID-JOB38>3.0.CO;2-Z
47 García M F, Posthuma R A, Colella A. Fit perceptions in the employment interview: The role of similarity, liking, and expectations[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2008, 81(2): 173-189. DOI:10.1348/096317907X238708
48 Guo L, Mao J Y, Chiang J T J, et al. Working hard or hardly working? How supervisor’s liking of employee affects interpretations of employee working overtime and performance ratings[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2021, 38(4): 1561-1586. DOI:10.1007/s10490-020-09715-z
49 Han J H, Liao H, Han J, et al. When leader–member exchange differentiation improves work group functioning: The combined roles of differentiation bases and reward interdependence[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2021, 74(1): 109-141. DOI:10.1111/peps.12415
50 Hu C Y, Wang S, Wang Y H, et al. Understanding attraction in formal mentoring relationships from an affective perspective[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2016, 94: 104-113. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.007
51 Hu J, Zhang Z, Jiang K, et al. Getting ahead, getting along, and getting prosocial: Examining extraversion facets, peer reactions, and leadership emergence[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2019, 104(11): 1369-1386. DOI:10.1037/apl0000413
52 Huang G H, Zhao H H, Niu X Y, et al. Reducing job insecurity and increasing performance ratings: Does impression management matter?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(5): 852-862. DOI:10.1037/a0033151
55 Huo Y J, Binning K R, Molina L E. Testing an integrative model of respect: Implications for social engagement and well-being[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2010, 36(2): 200-212. DOI:10.1177/0146167209356787
56 Jehn K A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 256-282. DOI:10.2307/2393638
58 Johnson D E, Erez A, Kiker D S, et al. Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals’ reputations, helpful behaviors and raters’ reward decisions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(4): 808-815. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.808
59 Johnson S K. I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19(1): 1-19. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.001
60 Ju H R. Competence as a mixed blessing: A model of perceived threat and instrumentality in explaining employee work outcomes[D]. Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2020.
61 Kahn R L, Wolfe D M, Quinn R P, et al. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity[M]. New York: Wiley, 1964.
62 Khattab J, Raines J, Hernandez M, et al. When good leaders fail: A temporal P-E fit perspective on leader derailment[J]. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2018, (1): 13907.
63 King B J. The orca’s sorrow[J]. Scientific American, 2019, 320(3): 30-35.
64 Kolodinsky R W, Treadway D C, Ferris G R. Political skill and influence effectiveness: Testing portions of an expanded Ferris and Judge (1991) model[J]. Human Relations, 2007, 60(12): 1747-1777. DOI:10.1177/0018726707084913
65 Koning L F, van Kleef G A. How leaders’ emotional displays shape followers’ organizational citizenship behavior[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2015, 26(4): 489-501. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.001
66 Ledgerwood A, Eastwick P W, Gawronski B. Experiences of liking versus ideas about liking[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2020, 43: e136. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X19003145
67 Lefkowitz J. The role of interpersonal affective regard in supervisory performance ratings: A literature review and proposed causal model[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000, 73(1): 67-85. DOI:10.1348/096317900166886
68 Lefkowitz J, Battista M. Potential sources of criterion bias in supervisor ratings used for test validation[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1995, 9(4): 389-414. DOI:10.1007/BF02230978
69 Levine E L, Xu X, Yang L Q, et al. Cross-national explorations of the impact of affect at work using the state-trait emotion measure: A coordinated series of studies in the United States, China, and Romania[J]. Human Performance, 2011, 24(5): 405-442. DOI:10.1080/08959285.2011.614302
71 Liden R C, Wayne S J, Stilwell D. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(4): 662-674. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662
73 Maaravi Y, Segal S. Reconsider what your MBA negotiation course taught you: The possible adverse effects of high salary requests[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2022, 139: 103803. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103803
74 Martinko M J, Mackey J D, Moss S E, et al. An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2018, 103(7): 738-752. DOI:10.1037/apl0000302
75 Mast M S, Hall J A, Schmid P C. Wanting to be boss and wanting to be subordinate: Effects on performance motivation[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 40(2): 458-472. DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00582.x
76 Miao C, Qian S S, Banks G C, et al. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: A meta-analytic review and future research agenda[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2020, 30(2): 100702. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100702
77 Moideenkutty U, Schmidt S. Relationship of liking and social exchange to supervisor-directed organizational citizenship behavior in the Arabian Gulf[J]. Review of International Business and Strategy, 2016, 26(2): 232-243. DOI:10.1108/RIBS-10-2013-0107
78 Montoya R M, Horton R S, Kirchner J. Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity[J]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2008, 25(6): 889-922. DOI:10.1177/0265407508096700
79 Mou Y, Zhang L, Wu Y H, et al. Does self-disclosing to a robot induce liking for the robot? Testing the disclosure and liking hypotheses in human–robot interaction[J]. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2023, doi: 10447318.2022.2163350.
80 Nault K A, Pitesa M, Thau S. The attractiveness advantage at work: A cross-disciplinary integrative review[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(2): 1103-1139. DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0134
81 Oleszkiewicz A, Lachowicz-Tabaczek K. Perceived competence and warmth influence respect, liking and trust in work relations[J]. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 2016, 47(4): 431-435. DOI:10.1515/ppb-2016-0050
82 Ollier-Malaterre A, Rothbard N P, Berg J M. When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013, 38(4): 645-669. DOI:10.5465/amr.2011.0235
83 Razzaq S, Iqbal M Z, Ikramullah M, et al. Occurrence of rating distortions and ratees’ fairness perceptions per raters’ mood and affect[J]. Career Development International, 2016, 21(7): 726-743. DOI:10.1108/CDI-03-2016-0036
84 Regan D T, Straus E, Fazio R. Liking and the attribution process[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10(4): 385-397. DOI:10.1016/0022-1031(74)90034-1
85 Robbins T L, DeNisi A S. A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79(3): 341-353. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.341
86 Roth P L, Arnold J D, Walker H J, et al. Organizational political affiliation and job seekers: If I don’t identify with your party, am I still attracted?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022, 107(5): 724-745. DOI:10.1037/apl0000932
87 Roth P L, Thatcher J B, Bobko P, et al. Political affiliation and employment screening decisions: The role of similarity and identification processes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020, 105(5): 472-486. DOI:10.1037/apl0000422
88 Rubin Z. Measurement of romantic love[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16(2): 265-273. DOI:10.1037/h0029841
89 Rubin Z. Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology[M]. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
90 Sanders T. The likeability factor: How to boost your L-factor and achieve your life’s dreams[M]. New York: Crown, 2006.
91 Schraeder M, Simpson J. How similarity and liking affect performance appraisals[J]. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 2006, 29(1): 34-40.
92 Sears G J, Hackett R D. The influence of role definition and affect in LMX: A process perspective on the personality-LMX relationship[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84(3): 544-564. DOI:10.1348/096317910X492081
93 Sette S, Spinrad T L, Baumgartner E. The relations of preschool children’s emotion knowledge and socially appropriate behaviors to peer likability[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2017, 41(4): 532-541. DOI:10.1177/0165025416645667
94 Shaughnessy B A, Treadway D C, Breland J A, et al. Influence and promotability: The importance of female political skill[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2011, 26(7): 584-603. DOI:10.1108/02683941111164490
95 Singer I. The nature of love[M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984.
96 Sprecher S. Does (dis)similarity information about a new acquaintance lead to liking or repulsion? An experimental test of a classic social psychology issue[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2019, 82(3): 303-318. DOI:10.1177/0190272519855954
97 Sutton A W, Baldwin S P, Wood L, et al. A meta-analysis of the relationship between rater liking and performance ratings[J]. Human Performance, 2013, 26(5): 409-429. DOI:10.1080/08959285.2013.836523
98 Swain J E. Effects of leader humility on the performance of virtual groups[J]. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2018, 12(1): 21-37. DOI:10.1002/jls.21552
99 Sy T. What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(2): 73-84. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.001
100 Tang P M, Koopman J, McClean S T, et al. When conscientious employees meet intelligent machines: An integrative approach inspired by complementarity theory and role theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2022, 65(3): 1019-1054. DOI:10.5465/amj.2020.1516
101 Teven J J. Effects of supervisor social influence, nonverbal immediacy, and biological sex on subordinates’ perceptions of job satisfaction, liking, and supervisor credibility[J]. Communication Quarterly, 2007, 55(2): 155-177. DOI:10.1080/01463370601036036
102 Thomas J S, Loignon A C, Woehr D J, et al. Dyadic viability in project teams: The impact of liking, competence, and task interdependence[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2020, 35(5): 573-591. DOI:10.1007/s10869-019-09647-6
103 Tsui A S, Barry B. Interpersonal affect and rating errors[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29(3): 586-599. DOI:10.2307/256225
104 Turban D B, Jones A P, Rozelle R M. Influences of supervisor liking of a subordinate and the reward context on the treatment and evaluation of that subordinate[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 1990, 14(3): 215-233. DOI:10.1007/BF00995570
105 Twenge J M, Campbell W K. Increases in positive self-views among high school students: Birth-cohort changes in anticipated performance, self-satisfaction, self-liking, and self-competence[J]. Psychological Science, 2008, 19(11): 1082-1086. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02204.x
106 Varma A, DeNisi A S, Peters L H. Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(2): 341-360. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01803.x
107 Wayne S J, Ferris G R. Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(5): 487-499. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487
108 Wayne S J, Liden R C. Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1): 232-260. DOI:10.2307/256734
111 Wee E X M, Liao H, Liu D, et al. Moving from abuse to reconciliation: A power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(6): 2352-2380. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0866
112 Wessels N M, Zimmermann J, Biesanz J C, et al. Differential associations of knowing and liking with accuracy and positivity bias in person perception[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2020, 118(1): 149-171. DOI:10.1037/pspp0000218
113 Whiteley P, Sy T, Johnson S K. Leaders’ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23(5): 822-834. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006
114 Whiting S W, Maynes T D, Podsakoff N P, et al. Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97(1): 159-182. DOI:10.1037/a0024871
115 Wojciszke B, Abele A E, Baryla W. Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 39(6): 973-990. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.595
116 Wullenkord R, Eyssel F. Diversity training with robots: Perspective-taking backfires, while sterotype-suppression decreases negative attitudes towards robots[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2022, 9: 728923. DOI:10.3389/frobt.2022.728923
117 Yam K C, Barnes C M, Leavitt K, et al. Why so serious? A laboratory and field investigation of the link between morality and humor[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019, 117(4): 758-772. DOI:10.1037/pspi0000171
118 Yam K C, Bigman Y E, Tang P M, et al. Robots at work: People prefer—and forgive—service robots with perceived feelings[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021, 106(10): 1557-1572. DOI:10.1037/apl0000834
119 Yammarino F J, Cheong M Y, Kim J, et al. Is leadership more than “I like my boss”?[A]. Buckley M R, Wheeler A R, Baur J E, et al. Research in personnel and human resources management[M]. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2020.
120 Yang Y Y, Li J, Sekiguchi T. How supervisors respond to employee voice: An experimental study in China and Japan[J]. Asian Business & Management, 2021, 20(1): 1-31. DOI:10.1057/s41291-019-00075-1
121 Zajonc R B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences[J]. American Psychologist, 1980, 35(2): 151-175. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
122 Zhang P. The affective response model: A theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(1): 247-274. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.11
123 Zheng X B, Men J Q, Xiang L, et al. Role of technology attraction and parasocial interaction in social shopping websites[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2020, 51: 102043. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102043
引用本文
郑立勋, 王雁飞, 朱瑜. 工作场所喜爱：研究进展与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(11): 117-137.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：消费领域的元宇宙：研究述评与展望
