生生不息：破解绩效导向的悖论 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

6 孙黎. 蓝军战略[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018.

7 赵汀阳. 坏世界研究: 作为第一哲学的政治哲学[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009.

8 Andriopoulos C, Lewis M W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation[J]. Organization Science,2009, 20(4): 696-717.

9 Bansal P, Song H C. Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2017, 11(1): 105-149. DOI:10.5465/annals.2015.0095

10 Barkema H G, Chen X P, George G, et al. West meets East: New concepts and theories[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(2): 460. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.4021

11 Blair M M. Post-Enron reflections on comparative corporate governance[J]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics,2003, 14(2): 113-124.

12 Chen M J. Transcending paradox: The Chinese " middle way” perspective[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2002, 19(2–3): 179-199.

13 Daily C M, Schwenk C. Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces?[J]. Journal of Management,1996, 22(2): 185-208. DOI:10.1177/014920639602200201

14 Eisenhardt K M. Agency theory: An assessment and review[J]. Academy of Management Review,1989, 14(1): 57-74.

15 Freeman R E. Ending the so-called " Friedman-Freeman” debate[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly,2008, 18(2): 162-166.

16 Friedman M. Capitalism and freedom[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

17 Gunderson L H, Holling C S. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.

18 Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of management Review,1984, 9(2): 193-206.

19 Harrison J S, Bosse D A, Phillips R A. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010, 31(1): 58-74. DOI:10.1002/smj.v31:1

20 Jensen M C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly,2002, 12(2): 235-256.

21 Lewis M W, Smith W K. Paradox as a meta-theoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2014, 50(2): 127-149.

22 Li P P. The unique value of Yin-Yang balancing: A critical response[J]. Management and Organization Review,2014, 10(2): 321-332.

23 March J G, Sutton R I. Crossroads-organizational performance as a dependent variable[J]. Organization Science,1997, 8(6): 698-706. DOI:10.1287/orsc.8.6.698

24 March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science,1991, 2(1): 71-87. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

25 Mitchell R K, Weaver G R, Agle B R, et al. Stakeholder agency and social welfare: Pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation[J]. Academy of Management Review,2016, 41(2): 252-275.

26 Plambeck N, Weber K. When the glass is half full and half empty: CEOs’ ambivalent interpretations of strategic issues[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010, 31(7): 689-710.

27 Porter M E, Kramer M R. The big idea: Creating shared value[J]. Harvard Business Review,2011, 89(1): 2-17.

28 Quinn R E, Rohrbaugh J. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis[J]. Management Science,1983, 29(3): 363-377. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363

29 Smith W K, Lewis M W. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing[J]. Academy of management Review,2011, 36(2): 381-403.

30 Sundaram A K, Inkpen A C. The corporate objective revisited[J]. Organization Science,2004, 15(3): 350-363. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1040.0068

31 Sundaramurthy C, Lewis M. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003, 28(3): 397-415. DOI:10.5465/amr.2003.10196737