5589 
5947学区房在我国基础教育资源分配中起着重要作用。那么，学区房问题是如何产生的？又将带来怎样的影响？以往的研究虽然已经也给出了各种回答和解释，但缺乏对学区房溢价的理论机理探讨，而对影响效应的研究则缺乏整体性分析。文章以马克思的级差地租理论为基础，从土地因素出发，研究学区房溢价产生的内在原因，并引入机会不平等理论研究教育级差地租的影响效应，进而利用CFPS调查数据进行实证检验，从而给出一个学区房溢价原因及其影响效应的政治经济学解释。研究表明：（1）由于政府对教育投入存在非均衡性，而向重点学校倾斜的投入政策导致了教育质量差异，而这种学区差异又通过学区房政策与土地进行绑定，转化为教育级差地租，进而产生了学区房溢价，即重点学校对应的学区房具有较高的教育级差地租和住房价格。（2）教育级差地租的存在将使得那些家庭财富更高和更加重视子女教育的家庭选择优质学区房，从而造成教育机会的不公平问题，即家庭财富对教育级差地租的支付存在显著的正向影响。因此，对于学区房问题，政府部门应该充分利用好城市土地所有权国有属性这一制度优势，将所获“地租”更多地投入到教育，特别是向普通学校倾斜，以促进教育机会更加公平。
学区房的教育级差地租及其不平等效应研究
摘要
参考文献
1 陈友华,施旖旎,季春梅. 学区房的形成机制及其社会后果研究[J]. 学海,2017,(4):122−127. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2017.04.016
4 戴双兴,朱立宇. 基于马克思地租理论的城市宏观级差地租研究[J]. 政治经济学评论,2017,(6):130−138. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7542.2017.06.008
6 方长春. 家庭背景如何影响教育获得:基于居住空间分异的视角[J]. 教育学报,2011,(6):118−126. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1298.2011.06.016
9 哈巍,吴红斌,余韧哲. 学区房溢价新探−基于北京市城六区重复截面数据的实证分析[J]. 教育与经济,2015,(5):3−10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2015.05.001
13 李世奇,马焕灵. 天价学区房现象批判−兼谈就近入学政策[J]. 当代教育科学,2014,(2):45−48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2014.02.012
19 王克忠. 试论城市级差地租Ⅲ[J]. 上海企业,2005,(4):13−15. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7808.2005.04.005
22 薛二勇,盛群力. 英国公平入学政策探析[J]. 比较教育研究,2007,(9):25−29. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2007.09.005
27 Bayer P,Ferreira F,McMillan R. A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2007,115(4): 588−638. DOI:10.1086/522381
28 Black S E. Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(2): 577−599. DOI:10.1162/003355399556070
30 Fack G,Grenet J. When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2010,94(1-2): 59−77. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.009
31 Gibbons S,Machin S. Valuing school quality,better transport,and lower crime:Evidence from house prices[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2008,24(1): 99−119. DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grn008
32 Jud G D,Watts J M. Schools and housing values[J]. Land Economics,1981,57(3): 459−470. DOI:10.2307/3146025
33 Kane T J,Riegg S K,Staiger D O. School quality,neighborhoods,and housing prices[J]. American Law and Economics Review,2006,8(2): 183−212. DOI:10.1093/aler/ahl007
34 Lancaster K J. A new approach to consumer theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1966,74(2): 132−157. DOI:10.1086/259131
35 Oates W E. The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values:An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1969,77(6): 957−971. DOI:10.1086/259584
36 Reback R. House prices and the provision of local public services:Capitalization under school choice programs[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2005,57(2): 275−301. DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2004.10.005
37 Robinson P M. Root-N-consistent semiparametric regression[J]. Econometrica,1988,56(4): 931−954. DOI:10.2307/1912705
38 Roemer J E. Equality of opportunity[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1998.
39 Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets:Product differentiation in pure competition[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1974,82(1): 34−55. DOI:10.1086/260169
40 Rosenthal L. The value of secondary school quality[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,2003,65(3): 329−355. DOI:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00053
41 Tiebout C M. A pure theory of local expenditures[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1956,64(5): 416−424. DOI:10.1086/257839
42 Weimer D L,Wolkoff M J. School performance and housing values:Using non-contiguous district and incorporation boundaries to identify school effects[J]. National Tax Journal,2001,54(2): 231−253. DOI:10.17310/ntj.2001.2.03
43 Wen H Z,Zhang Y,Zhang L. Do educational facilities affect housing price? An empirical study in Hangzhou,China[J]. Habitat International,2014,42: 155−163. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.004
44 Zhang M Y,Chen J. Unequal school enrollment rights,rent yields gap,and increased inequality:The case of Shanghai[J]. China Economic Review,2018,49: 229−240. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.04.007
45 Zheng S Q,Kahn M E. Land and residential property markets in a booming economy:New evidence from Beijing[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2008,63(2): 743−757. DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.010
引用本文
马艳, 杨晗. 学区房的教育级差地租及其不平等效应研究[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 46(5): 37-51.
导出参考文献，格式为：
