2985 
2766在数字化时代背景下，为提高组织绩效，实现高质量发展，越来越多的企业开始使用电子绩效监控，这使得员工与组织之间的边界在逐渐消失。这种数字化驱动的监控模式能否起到预期的效果，受到了学界和业界的普遍关注。本文基于对国内外相关文献的梳理与分析，首先厘清了电子绩效监控的起源、内涵，以及与电子监控、传统的绩效监控等概念之间的联系和区别，阐述了衡量电子绩效监控的标准和方式；其次，系统地归纳了现有电子绩效监控相关研究涉及的理论基础、影响因素、作用结果和边界条件等，构建了电子绩效监控研究的整合框架；最后，总结并揭示了本文的理论意义与实践启示，分别从研究方法、研究内容、研究视角和理论基础四个方面探讨了电子绩效监控已有研究的不足和未来的研究方向。
渐消的边界：电子绩效监控研究述评与展望
摘要
参考文献
1 朋震, 王斯纬, 王青松. 零工平台模式下电子绩效监控对零工工作者持续价值共创行为的影响[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2022, 39(6): 23-38. DOI:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2022.6.002
3 Abraham M, Niessen C, Schnabel C, et al. Electronic monitoring at work: The role of attitudes, functions, and perceived control for the acceptance of tracking technologies[J]. Human Resource Management Journal, 2019, 29(4): 657-675. DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.12250
4 Ahmed F, Soomro S A, Tunio F H, et al. Performance monitoring, subordinate’s felt trust and ambidextrous behavior; toward a conceptual research framework[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 758123. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.758123
5 Aiello J R, Douthitt E A. Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring[J]. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2001, 5(3): 163-180. DOI:10.1037/1089-2699.5.3.163
6 Aiello J R, Kolb K J. Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80(3): 339-353. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339
7 Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211. DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
8 Alder G S. Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1998, 17(7): 729-743. DOI:10.1023/A:1005776615072
9 Alder G S, Schminke M, Noel T W, et al. Employee reactions to internet monitoring: The moderating role of ethical orientation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 80(3): 481-498. DOI:10.1007/s10551-007-9432-2
10 Alge B J. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(4): 797-804. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.797
11 Amick Ⅲ B C, Smith M J. Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: A conceptual overview[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1992, 23(1): 6-16. DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90005-G
12 Ball K S, Margulis S T. Electronic monitoring and surveillance in call centres: A framework for investigation[J]. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2011, 26(2): 113-126. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00263.x
13 Baron R A. Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73(2): 199-207. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.199
14 Baumeister R F. A self-presentational view of social phenomena[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91(1): 3-26. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3
15 Bhave D P. The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2014, 67(3): 605-635. DOI:10.1111/peps.12046
16 Carver C S, Scheier M F. Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior[M]. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
17 Claypoole V L, Szalma J L. Electronic performance monitoring and sustained attention: Social facilitation for modern applications[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 94: 25-34. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.001
18 Cropanzano R, Byrne Z S, Bobocel D R, et al. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, 58(2): 164-209. DOI:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
19 Doberstein C, Charbonneau É, Morin G, et al. Measuring the acceptability of facial recognition-enabled work surveillance cameras in the public and private sector[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2022, 45(1): 198-227. DOI:10.1080/15309576.2021.1931374
20 Edwards L, Martin L, Henderson T. Employee surveillance: The road to surveillance is paved with good intentions[R]. SSRN 3234382, 2018.
21 Fischer T, Riedl R. On the stress potential of an organisational climate of innovation: A survey study in Germany[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2022, 41(4): 805-826. DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1836258
22 Gagné M, Bhave D. Autonomy in the workplace: An essential ingredient to employee engagement and well-being in every culture[A]. Chirkov V I, Ryan R M, Sheldon K M. Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being[M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
23 Geen R G. Alternative conceptions of social facilitation[A]. Paulus P B. Psychology of group influence[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. , 1989.
24 Goomas D T, Ludwig T D. Enhancing incentive programs with proximal goals and immediate feedback: Engineered labor standards and technology enhancements in stocker replenishment[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2007, 27(1): 33-68. DOI:10.1300/J075v27n01_02
25 Holland P J, Cooper B, Hecker R. Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: The effects on trust in management, and the moderating role of occupational type[J]. Personnel Review, 2015, 44(1): 161-175. DOI:10.1108/PR-11-2013-0211
26 Hulin C. Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations[A]. Dunnette M D, Hough L M. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology[M]. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991.
27 Jeske D, Santuzzi A M. Monitoring what and how: Psychological implications of electronic performance monitoring[J]. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2015, 30(1): 62-78. DOI:10.1111/ntwe.12039
28 Kalischko T, Riedl R. Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: Conceptualization, review of effects and moderators, and future research opportunities[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 633031. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633031
29 Kalischko T, Riedl R. Electronic performance monitoring: Review of theories, conceptual framework, and study proposal[A]. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on human-computer interaction[C]. Cham Switzerland: Springer2022.
30 Martin A J, Wellen J M, Grimmer M R. An eye on your work: How empowerment affects the relationship between electronic surveillance and counterproductive work behaviours[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2016, 27(21): 2635-2651. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2016.1225313
31 McNall L A, Roch S G. Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007, 37(3): 658-682. DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00179.x
32 McNall L A, Roch S G. A social exchange model of employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring[J]. Human Performance, 2009, 22(3): 204-224. DOI:10.1080/08959280902970385
33 McNall L A, Stanton J. Employee location sensing: Implications for security and privacy[A]. Rao H R, Upadhyaya S. Annals of emerging research in information assurance, security and privacy services[M]. Bingley: United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009.
34 McNall L A, Stanton J M. Private eyes are watching you: Reactions to location sensing technologies[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2011, 26(3): 299-309. DOI:10.1007/s10869-010-9189-y
35 Neal A F, Hesketh B. Technology and performance[A]. Ilgen D R, Pukalos E D. The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation and development[M]. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1999.
36 Nebeker D M, Tatum B C. The Effects of computer monitoring, standards, and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction, and stress[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1993, 23(7): 508-536. DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01101.x
37 Petronio S. Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples[J]. Communication Theory, 1991, 1(4): 311-335. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x
38 Rafnsdóttir G L, Gudmundsdottir M L. EPM technology and the psychosocial work environment[J]. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2011, 26(3): 210-221. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00270.x
39 Ravid D M, Tomczak D L, White J C, et al. EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring[J]. Journal of Management, 2020, 46(1): 100-126. DOI:10.1177/0149206319869435
40 Ravid D M, White J C, Tomczak D L, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of electronic performance monitoring on work outcomes[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2023, 76(1): 5-40. DOI:10.1111/peps.12514
41 Schleifer L M, Galinsky T L, Pan C S. Mood disturbances and musculoskeletal discomfort: Effects of electronic performance monitoring under different levels of VDT data-entry performance[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1996, 8(4): 369-384. DOI:10.1080/10447319609526159
42 Scholarios D, Taylor P. ‘Decommissioned vessels’—Performance management and older workers in technologically-intensive service work[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 89: 333-342. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.004
43 Sherif K, Al-Hitmi M. The moderating role of competition and paradoxical leadership on perceptions of fairness towards IoT monitoring[R]. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2017 – America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017.
44 Sherif K, Jewesimi O. Electronic performance monitoring friend or foe? Empowering employees through data analytics[Z]. Americas Conference on Information Systerms, 2018, Corpus ID: 53047247.
45 Siegel R, König C J, Porsch L. Does electronic monitoring pay off?[J]. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2021, 20(3): 103-113. DOI:10.1027/1866-5888/a000273
46 Smith M J, Carayon P, Sanders K J, et al. Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1992, 23(1): 17-27. DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90006-H
47 Smith M J, Sainfort P C. A balance theory of job design for stress reduction[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1989, 4(1): 67-79. DOI:10.1016/0169-8141(89)90051-6
48 Spitzmüller C, Stanton J M. Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2006, 79(2): 245-272. DOI:10.1348/096317905X52607
49 Stanton J M. Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions[J]. Human Performance, 2000, 13(1): 85-113. DOI:10.1207/S15327043HUP1301_4
50 Stanton J M, Barnes-Farrell J L. Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81(6): 738-745. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.738
51 Stanton J M, Julian A L. The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002, 18(1): 85-101. DOI:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00029-2
52 Stanton J M, Weiss E M. Electronic monitoring in their own words: An exploratory study of employees’ experiences with new types of surveillance[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 16(4): 423-440. DOI:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00018-2
53 Thompson L F, Sebastianelli J D, Murray N P. Monitoring online training behaviors: Awareness of electronic surveillance hinders E-learners[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009, 39(9): 2191-2212. DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00521.x
54 Tomczak D L, Lanzo L A, Aguinis H. Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring[J]. Business Horizons, 2018, 61(2): 251-259. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.006
55 U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. The electronic supervisor: New technology, new tensions[R]. Washington: U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1987.
56 Watson A M, Foster Thompson L, Rudolph J V, et al. When big brother is watching: Goal orientation shapes reactions to electronic monitoring during online training[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(4): 642-657. DOI:10.1037/a0032002
57 Wells D L, Moorman R H, Werner J M. The impact of the perceived purpose of electronic performance monitoring on an array of attitudinal variables[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2007, 18(1): 121-138. DOI:10.1002/hrdq.1194
58 Wenzel R, Van Quaquebeke N. The double-edged sword of big data in organizational and management research: A review of opportunities and risks[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2018, 21(3): 548-591. DOI:10.1177/1094428117718627
59 West J P, Bowman J S. Electronic surveillance at work: An ethical analysis[J]. Administration & Society, 2016, 48(5): 628-651.
60 Yin N. The influencing outcomes of job engagement: An interpretation from the social exchange theory[J]. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2018, 67(5): 873-889. DOI:10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0054
61 Yost A B, Behrend T S, Howardson G, et al. Reactance to electronic surveillance: A test of antecedents and outcomes[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2019, 34(1): 71-86. DOI:10.1007/s10869-018-9532-2
62 Zajonc R B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9(2): 1-27. DOI:10.1037/h0025848
63 Zajonc R B. Compresence[A]. Paulus P B. Psychology of group influence[M]. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
引用本文
邱茜, 朱泽琦. 渐消的边界：电子绩效监控研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(11): 97-116.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：董事选举得票率与企业违规行为
