4304 
4050作为一种具有“亲上级”和“非伦理”双重属性的员工行为，亲上级非伦理行为近年来日益受到学界和业界的关注。但整体而言，相关研究成果还十分有限，基于中国情境的研究更是匮乏。本研究扎根于中国文化情境，探讨上下级关系、下属的传统性、企业性质对亲上级非伦理行为的作用机理。通过对49个工作团队327名员工数据的多层次分析，研究结果表明：（1）上下级关系对亲上级非伦理行为的影响呈U形特征，即随着上下级关系由中等水平上升为高水平，下属采取的亲上级非伦理行为增加，而随着上下级关系由中等水平下降为低水平，下属采取的亲上级非伦理行为亦增加；（2）相较于低传统性的下属，在高传统性的下属中，这一U形特征更明显；（3）相较于非国有企业，在国有企业中，这一U形特征更明显。本研究的结果拓展了对亲上级非伦理行为何以形成的理解，同时也为本土组织管控亲上级非伦理行为提供了一些启示。
上下级关系如何影响亲上级非伦理行为？——基于中国文化情境的研究
摘要
参考文献
3 丁越兰, 徐显航, 覃鹏. 新生代员工工作价值观、企业性质对创新绩效的影响[J]. 商业研究,2016, (9): 159-166. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-148X.2016.09.021
5 郭晓薇. 中国情境中的上下级关系构念研究述评——兼论领导—成员交换理论的本土贴切性[J]. 南开管理评论,2011, 14(2): 61-68. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.02.008
6 郭晓薇, 李成彦. 中国人的上下级关系: 整合构念的建立与初步检验[J]. 管理学报,2015, 12(2): 167-177. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.02.002
7 姜定宇, 张菀真. 华人差序式领导与部属效能[J]. 本土心理学研究,2010, (6): 109-177.
9 林英晖, 程垦. 领导—部属交换与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 差序格局视角[J]. 管理科学,2016, 29(5): 57-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.05.005
10 林英晖, 程垦. 差序式领导与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 圈内人和圈外人视角[J]. 管理科学,2017, 30(3): 35-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.03.004
12 罗帆, 徐瑞华. 高承诺人力资源管理实践对亲组织非伦理行为的影响——组织支持感的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2017, 34(10): 28-38. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4124.2017.10.004
13 罗家德. 关系与圈子——中国人工作场域中的圈子现象[J]. 管理学报,2012, 9(2): 165-171, 178. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2012.02.002
19 杨国枢. 中国人的社会取向——社会互动的观点[M]. 中国台北: 桂冠图书公司, 1993.
20 杨国枢, 黄光国. 中国人的心理与行为[M]. 中国台北: 桂冠图书公司, 1991.
21 杨国枢, 余安邦, 叶明华. 中国人的个人传统性与现代性: 概念与测量[A]. 杨国枢, 黄光国. 中国人的心理与行为[C]. 中国台北: 桂冠图书公司, 1989.
23 张桂平. 职场排斥对员工亲组织性非伦理行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理科学,2016, 29(4): 104-114. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.04.009
24 张田, 罗家德. 圈子中的组织公民行为[J]. 管理学报,2015, 12(10): 1442-1449. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.10.005
26 张永军, 张鹏程, 赵君. 家长式领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响: 基于传统性的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论,2017, 20(2): 169-179. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.02.015
28 赵慧娟, 龙立荣. 中国转型经济背景下个人—组织契合对员工离职意愿的影响——企业所有制形式与职位类型的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2008, 11(5): 56-63, 72. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2008.05.009
30 郑雅琴, 贾良定, 尤树洋, 等. 中国管理与组织的情境化研究——基于10篇高度中国情境化研究论文的分析[J]. 管理学报,2013, 10(11): 1561-1566. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.11.001
33 Blau P M. Exchange and power in social life[M]. New York: Wiley, 1964.
34 Chen M, Chen C C, Sheldon O J. Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2016, 101(8): 1082-1096. DOI:10.1037/apl0000111
35 Chen Z X, Francesco A M. Employee demography, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in China: Do cultural differences matter?[J]. Human Relations,2000, 53(6): 869-887. DOI:10.1177/0018726700536005
36 Cheng K, Wei F, Lin Y H. The trickle-down effect of responsible leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of leader-follower value congruence[J]. Journal of Business Research,2019, 102: 34-43. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.044
37 Cropanzano R, Mitchell M S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review[J]. Journal of Management,2005, 31(6): 874-900. DOI:10.1177/0149206305279602
38 Davidson T, Van Dyne L, Lin B L. Too attached to speak up? It depends: How supervisor-subordinate guanxi and perceived job control influence upward constructive voice[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2017, 143: 39-53. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.002
39 Dulac T, Coyle-Shapiro J A M, Henderson D J, et al. Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2008, 51(6): 1079-1098. DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.35732596
40 Farh J L, Earley P C, Lin S C. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997, 42(3): 421-444. DOI:10.2307/2393733
41 Fehr E, Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000, 14(3): 159-181. DOI:10.1257/jep.14.3.159
42 Ghosh S K. The direct and interactive effects of job insecurity and job embeddedness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: An empirical examination[J]. Personnel Review,2017, 46(6): 1182-1198. DOI:10.1108/PR-05-2015-0126
43 Gouldner A W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement[J]. American Sociological Review,1960, 25(2): 161-178. DOI:10.2307/2092623
44 Guan X Y, Frenkel S J. Explaining supervisor-subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens[J]. Human Relations,2019, 72(11): 1752-1775. DOI:10.1177/0018726718813718
46 Hu C Y, Baranik L E, Cheng Y N, et al. Mentoring support and protégé creativity: Examining the moderating roles of job dissatisfaction and Chinese traditionality[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,2020, 58(3): 335-355. DOI:10.1111/1744-7941.12226
47 Hui C, Lee C, Rousseau D M. Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?[J]. Organization Science,2004, 15(2): 232-240. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1030.0050
48 Johnson H H, Umphress E E. To help my supervisor: Identification, moral identity, and unethical pro-supervisor behavior[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2019, 159(2): 519-534. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3836-z
49 Lam C F, Liang J, Ashford S J, et al. Job insecurity and organizational citizenship behavior: Exploring curvilinear and moderated relationships[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(2): 499-510. DOI:10.1037/a0038659
50 Law K S, Wong C S, Wang D X, et al. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,2000, 11(4): 751-765. DOI:10.1080/09585190050075105
51 Lawrence E R, Kacmar K M. Exploring the impact of job insecurity on employees’ unethical behavior[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly,2017, 27(1): 39-70. DOI:10.1017/beq.2016.58
52 Lee A, Thomas G, Martin R, et al. Beyond relationship quality: The role of leader-member exchange importance in leader-follower dyads[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2019, 92(4): 736-763. DOI:10.1111/joop.12262
53 Li S L, Huo Y Y, Long L R. Chinese traditionality matters: Effects of differentiated empowering leadership on followers’ trust in leaders and work outcomes[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2017, 145(1): 81-93. DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2900-1
54 Mesdaghinia S, Rawat A, Nadavulakere S. Why moral followers quit: Examining the role of leader bottom-line mentality and unethical pro-leader behavior[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2019, 159(2): 491-505. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3812-7
55 Meyer R D, Dalal R S, Hermida R. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences[J]. Journal of Management,2010, 36(1): 121-140. DOI:10.1177/0149206309349309
56 Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(5): 879-903. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
57 Ren S, Chadee D. Is guanxi always good for employee self-development in China? Examining non-linear and moderated relationships[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2017, 98: 108-117. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.10.005
58 Steenkamp J B E M, De Long M G, Baumgartner H. Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2010, 47(2): 199-214. DOI:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199
59 Thau S, Derfler-Rozin R, Pitesa M, et al. Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(1): 98-113. DOI:10.1037/a0036708
60 Trevino L K. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model[J]. Academy of Management Review,1986, 11(3): 601-617. DOI:10.5465/amr.1986.4306235
61 Umphress E E, Bingham J B. When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors[J]. Organization Science,2011, 22(3): 621-640. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0559
62 Umphress E E, Bingham J B, Mitchell M S. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2010, 95(4): 769-780. DOI:10.1037/a0019214
63 Valle M, Kacmar K M, Zivnuska S. Understanding the effects of political environments on unethical behavior in organizations[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2019, 156(1): 173-188. DOI:10.1007/s10551-017-3576-5
64 Zhang L, Lam C F, Deng Y L. Leader-member exchange and guanxi are not the same: Differential impact of dyadic relationships on fit perceptions, helping behavior, and turnover intention[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,2017, 28(7): 1005-1030. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2015.1128469
引用本文
程垦, 林英晖, 夏青, 等. 上下级关系如何影响亲上级非伦理行为？——基于中国文化情境的研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(4): 34-49.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：组织污名对企业国际化绩效的影响
下一篇：劳动模范、内部薪酬差距与企业业绩
