3871 
6060上下级关系矛盾体验指员工对领导—成员交换关系同时具有积极和消极两种评价取向，通常会对员工工作结果产生不良影响。本研究基于社会信息加工理论，探讨了上下级关系矛盾体验对员工主动性行为的影响、员工组织地位感知在其中的中介作用以及威权领导的调节作用。通过对409份领导与员工配对数据的分析发现：（1）员工上下级关系矛盾体验越强，做出的主动性行为越少；（2）员工上下级关系矛盾体验通过组织地位感知对主动性行为产生影响；（3）威权领导调节员工上下级关系矛盾体验与组织地位感知之间的关系，并调节员工上下级关系矛盾体验通过组织地位感知影响员工主动性行为的间接效应，即威权领导水平越高，具有上下级关系矛盾体验的员工组织地位感知越低，主动性行为也越少。本研究挖掘了不利于员工做出主动性行为的个体态度与领导因素，明晰了员工上下级关系矛盾体验与主动性行为之间的关系及二者之间的具体影响过程，为激励员工从事主动性行为提供了新思路。
爱恨交织：上下级关系矛盾体验对员工主动性行为的影响
摘要
参考文献
9 郑伯埙. 家长权威与领导行为之关系: 一个台湾民营企业主持人的个案研究[J]. 民族学研究所集刊,1995, (79): 119-173.
11 Anderson C, John O P, Keltner D, et al. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 81(1): 116-132. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
12 Ashforth B E, Rogers K M, Pratt M G, et al. Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach[J]. Organization Science,2014, 25(5): 1453-1478. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
13 Baek Y M. An integrative model of ambivalence[J]. The Social Science Journal,2010, 47(3): 609-629. DOI:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.02.003
14 Bateman T S, Crant J M. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1993, 14(2): 103-118. DOI:10.1002/job.4030140202
15 Bindl U K, Parker S K. Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations[A]. Zedeck S. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology[C]. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association, 2011.
16 Conner M, Sparks P. Ambivalence and attitudes[J]. European Review of Social Psychology,2002, 12(1): 37-70. DOI:10.1080/14792772143000012
17 Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,2007, 12(1): 1-22. DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
18 Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, et al. Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002, 87(3): 565-573. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
19 Endsley M R, Bolté B, Jones D G. Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design[M]. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2003.
20 Fingerman K L, Pitzer L, Lefkowitz E S, et al. Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: Implications for the well-being of both parties[J]. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,2008, 63(6): 362-371. DOI:10.1093/geronb/63.6.P362
22 Grant A M. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(2): 393-417. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
23 Guarana C L, Hernandez M. Identified ambivalence: When cognitive conflicts can help individuals overcome cognitive traps[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2016, 101(7): 1013-1029. DOI:10.1037/apl0000105
24 Han Y. Ambivalence in the leader-follower relationship: Dispositional antecedents and effects on work-related well-being[D]. Ottawa, Ontario: Carleton University, 2020.
25 Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2013.
26 Janssen O, Gao L P. Supervisory responsiveness and employee self-perceived status and voice behavior[J]. Journal of Management,2015, 41(7): 1854-1872. DOI:10.1177/0149206312471386
27 Kreiner G E, Ashforth B E. Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2004, 25(1): 1-27. DOI:10.1002/job.234
28 Larsen J T, McGraw A P, Cacioppo J T. Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 81(4): 684-696. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684
29 Lee A, Thomas G, Martin R, et al. Leader-member exchange (LMX) ambivalence and task performance: The cross-domain buffering role of social support[J]. Journal of Management,2019, 45(5): 1927-1957. DOI:10.1177/0149206317741190
30 Methot J R, Melwani S, Rothman N B. The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 43(6): 1789-1819. DOI:10.1177/0149206316685853
31 Parker S K, Bindl U K, Strauss K. Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation[J]. Journal of Management,2010, 36(4): 827-856. DOI:10.1177/0149206310363732
32 Parker S K, Williams H M, Turner N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2006, 91(3): 636-652. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
33 Peng K, Nisbett R E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction[J]. American Psychologist,1999, 54(9): 741-754. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741
34 Piderit S K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000, 25(4): 783-794. DOI:10.5465/amr.2000.3707722
35 Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(5): 879-903. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
36 Rothman N B, Pratt M G, Rees L, et al. Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2017, 11(1): 33-72. DOI:10.5465/annals.2014.0066
37 Salancik G R, Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1978, 23(2): 224-253. DOI:10.2307/2392563
38 Schuh S C, Van Quaquebeke N, Göritz A S, et al. Mixed feelings, mixed blessing? How ambivalence in organizational identification relates to employees’ regulatory focus and citizenship behaviors[J]. Human Relations,2016, 69(12): 2224-2249. DOI:10.1177/0018726716639117
39 Seibert S E, Crant J M, Kraimer M L. Proactive personality and career success[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1999, 84(3): 416-427. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
40 Sparrowe R T, Liden R C. Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspectives[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2005, 50(4): 505-535. DOI:10.2189/asqu.50.4.505
41 Tyler T R. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1989, 57(5): 830-838. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830
42 Tyler T R, Blader S L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2003, 7(4): 349-361. DOI:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
44 Zhang A Y, Tsui A S, Wang D X. Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2011, 22(5): 851-862. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.007
45 Zhang Y, Waldman D A, Han Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(2): 538-566. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
引用本文
刘燕君, 徐世勇, 张慧, 等. 爱恨交织：上下级关系矛盾体验对员工主动性行为的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(5): 123-136.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：使命效价：文献述评与研究展望
