7857 
8126创业团队认知推动了创业团队研究从关注团队行为理性深化为团队认知理性，揭示出团队行动背后所隐含的驱动机制，逐渐成为创业学领域的独立议题之一。目前针对创业团队认知的研究处于起步阶段，研究内容也较为零散。本文通过梳理国内外相关文献，立足状态观、过程观以及能力观三个视角归纳出创业团队认知的概念内涵；然后，分别从认知基础、认知互动、情绪体验层面梳理创业团队认知的前置因素，并阐述创业团队认知对团队创造力、团队行为、创业过程、创业绩效的影响；最后，提出创业团队认知的前因后果作用机制整合框架，并对未来研究进行展望。
创业团队认知研究现状探析与未来展望
摘要
参考文献
5 聂晶, 孙继伟. 分布式认知理论及其在管理实践中的应用[J]. 管理学报, 2009,（11）: 1455–1459. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2009.11.006
9 Amabile T M, Barsade S G, Mueller J S, et al. Affect and creativity at work[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50（3）: 367–403. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
10 Amason A C, Shrader R C, Tompson G H. Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21（1）: 125–148. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.008
11 Baron R A. The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic " why” questions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, 19（2）: 221–239. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
12 Baron R A, Ensley M D. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52（9）: 1331–1344. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538
13 Bartel C A, Saavedra R. The collective construction of work group moods[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45（2）: 197–231. DOI:10.2307/2667070
14 Beckman C M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49（4）: 741–758. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083030
15 Bryant P T. Imprinting by design: The microfoundations of entrepreneurial adaptation[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38（5）: 1081–1102. DOI:10.1111/etap.2014.38.issue-5
16 Chowdhury S. Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important?[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20（6）: 727–746. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.001
17 Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35（1）: 128–152. DOI:10.2307/2393553
18 DeChurch L A, Mesmer-Magnus J R. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95（1）: 32–53. DOI:10.1037/a0017328
19 de Mol E, Khapova S N, Elfring T. Entrepreneurial team cognition: A review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015, 17（2）: 232–255. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2015.17.issue-2
20 Dew N, Grichnik D, Mayer-Haug K, et al. Situated entrepreneurial cognition[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015, 17（2）: 143–164. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2015.17.issue-2
21 Dimov D. Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35（1）: 57–81. DOI:10.1111/etap.2011.35.issue-1
22 Eggers J P, Kaplan S. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20（2）: 461–477. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401
23 Eisenhardt K M, Schoonhoven C B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35（3）: 504–529. DOI:10.2307/2393315
24 Ensley M D, Hmieleski K M. A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34（7）: 1091–1105. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008
25 Ensley M D, Pearce C L. Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22（2）: 145–160. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
26 Farjoun M. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35（2）: 202–225. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2010.48463331
27 Forbes D P, Borchert P S, Zellmer-Bruhn M E, et al. Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, 30（2）: 225–248. DOI:10.1111/etap.2006.30.issue-2
28 García J B D, De Quevedo Puente E, Mazagatos V B. How affect relates to entrepreneurship: A systematic review of the literature and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015, 17（2）: 191–211. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2015.17.issue-2
29 Grégoire D A, Corbett A C, McMullen J S. The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48（6）: 1443–1477. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00922.x
30 Gruber M, MacMillan I C, Thompson J D. From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38（5）: 1421–1449. DOI:10.1177/0149206310386228
31 Haynie J M, Shepherd D A, McMullen J S. An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46（3）: 337–361. DOI:10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-3
32 Haynie J M, Shepherd D A, Patzelt H. Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: The role of metacognitive ability and feedback[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36（2）: 237–265. DOI:10.1111/etap.2012.36.issue-2
33 Hung W. Team-based complex problem solving: A collective cognition perspective[J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2013, 61（3）: 365–384. DOI:10.1007/s11423-013-9296-3
34 Klimoski R, Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?[J]. Journal of Management, 1994, 20（2）: 403–437. DOI:10.1177/014920639402000206
35 Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88（4）: 587–604. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
36 Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26（3）: 356–376.
37 Mitchell R K, Randolph-Seng B, Mitchell J R. Socially situated cognition: Imagining new opportunities for entrepreneurship research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36（4）: 774–776.
38 Mohammed S, Dumville B C. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22（2）: 89–106. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
39 Parker S C. Can cognitive biases explain venture team homophily?[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2009, 3（1）: 67–83. DOI:10.1002/sej.v3:1
40 Perry-Smith J E, Shalley C E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28（1）: 89–106.
41 Perry-Smith J E, Coff R W. In the mood for entrepreneurial creativity? How optimal group affect differs for generating and selecting ideas for new ventures[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2011, 5（3）: 247–268. DOI:10.1002/sej.v5.3
42 Sadler-Smith E. Cognitive style and the management of small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Organization Studies, 2004, 25（2）: 155–181. DOI:10.1177/0170840604036914
43 Schwarz N, Clore G L. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45（3）: 513–523. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
44 Souitaris V, Maestro B M M. Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31（6）: 652–678.
45 Staw B M. Dressing up like an organization: When psychological theories can explain organizational action[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17（4）: 805–819. DOI:10.1177/014920639101700412
46 Vallacher R R, Wegner D M. What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior[J]. Psychological Review, 1987, 94（1）: 3–15. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
47 Vissa B, Chacar A S. Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30（11）: 1179–1191. DOI:10.1002/smj.v30:11
48 West Ⅲ G P. Collective cognition: When entrepreneurial teams, not individuals, make decisions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2007, 31（1）: 77–102. DOI:10.1111/etap.2007.31.issue-1
引用本文
王国红, 周建林, 秦兰. 创业团队认知研究现状探析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(4): 3–14.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：美国赤字财政的三十五年
