5067 
2338创业团队通常拥有亲戚、朋友等亲密关系，实践中却存在不少因权利争斗而导致关系破裂的例子。创业团队契约治理作为一种通过正式、具有法律约束的协议规范契约双方的行为和结果的治理模式，是否能显著提升团队亲密度呢？基于377份主创业者调研问卷，本文发现：（1）创业团队契约治理能够有效提升团队成员亲密度。（2）创业团队契约治理主要通过提升团队成员的分配公平感和程序公平感，从而提升团队成员亲密度。（3）当新创企业绩效水平较高时，分配公平感对亲密度的促进作用越强，而程序公平感对亲密度的促进作用有所削弱；当新创企业绩效水平较低时，程序公平感对亲密度的促进作用越强，而分配公平感对亲密度的促进作用有所削弱。本研究丰富了创业团队治理及亲密度的研究，并对创业实践有直接的指导意义。
谈钱真的伤感情吗？创业团队契约治理对成员亲密关系的影响
摘要
参考文献
1 贺伟, 蒿坡. 薪酬分配差异一定会降低员工情感承诺吗——薪酬水平、绩效薪酬强度和员工多元化的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2014, 17(4): 13-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2014.04.003
2 朱仁宏, 代吉林, 曾楚宏. 创业团队演化与治理研究: 基于人力资本理论的解释[J]. 学术研究,2013, (10): 81-86,100. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2013.10.013
4 朱仁宏, 曾楚宏, 代吉林. 创业团队研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2012, 34(11): 11-18. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2012.11.003
5 朱仁宏, 周琦, 伍兆祥. 创业团队契约治理真能促进新创企业绩效吗——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 南开管理评论,2018, 21(5): 30-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2018.05.005
6 Bar-Kalifa E, Pshedetzky-Shochat R, Rafaeli E, et al. Daily support equity in romantic couples: Response surface analyses of monadic and dyadic data[J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science,2018, 9(7): 790-801. DOI:10.1177/1948550617725150
7 Brockner J, Wiesenfeld B M. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1996, 120(2): 189-208. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189
8 Cohen-Charash Y, Spector P E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2001, 86(2): 278-321. DOI:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
9 Dunbar R I M. The anatomy of friendship[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2018, 22(1): 32-51. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.004
10 Francis D H, Sandberg W R. Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2000, 25(2): 5-26. DOI:10.1177/104225870002500201
11 Karney B R. Socioeconomic status and intimate relationships[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,2021, 72: 391-414. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658
12 Klotz A C, Hmieleski K M, Bradley B H, et al. New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research[J]. Journal of Management,2014, 40(1): 226-255. DOI:10.1177/0149206313493325
13 Krishnan R, Geyskens I, Steenkamp J B E M. The effectiveness of contractual and trust-based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2016, 37(12): 2521-2542. DOI:10.1002/smj.2469
14 Kwong J Y Y, Leung K. A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2002, 87(2): 278-299. DOI:10.1006/obhd.2001.2966
15 Masterson S S, Lewis K, Goldman B M, et al. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000, 43(4): 738-748. DOI:10.2307/1556364
17 Pillemer J, Rothbard N P. Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship[J]. Academy of Management Review,2018, 43(4): 635-660. DOI:10.5465/amr.2016.0309
18 Sprecher S. Inequity leads to distress and a reduction in satisfaction: Evidence from a priming experiment[J]. Journal of Family Issues,2018, 39(1): 230-244. DOI:10.1177/0192513X16637098
19 Tyler T R, Blader S L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2003, 7(4): 349-361. DOI:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
20 Zahra S A, Neubaum D O, El-Hagrassey G M. Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2002, 27(1): 1-28. DOI:10.1111/1540-8520.t01-2-00001
引用本文
朱仁宏, 王雅渲, 时方方, 等. 谈钱真的伤感情吗？创业团队契约治理对成员亲密关系的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(2): 118-133.
导出参考文献，格式为：
