12172 
11318Customer psychological ownership refers to the state in which customers feel as though the target （products, brands and firms etc.） of ownership or a piece of that target is " theirs”, emphasizing the possessive core of the targets related to consumption. Customer psychological ownership is beyond the actual ownership, being considered to be the root of the endowment effect and having an impact on product valuation and purchase intention. It is on the highest stair of the customer relationship developing ladder, connected with the most stable and profitable customers, and has a significant impact on customer loyalty and customer citizenship behavior. Based on a literature review of customer psychological ownership at home and abroad, this paper sorts out current research achievements in aspects such as concept, origin and measurement, antecedents, and effects. Future research directions and theoretical applications in domains of customization, B2B relationship, local branding and advertising are also proposed. Although the empirical research on customer psychological ownership began in 2008, the phenomenon has been paid attention to by a number of scholars in the earlier ten years ago, referred to as customer cooperator, brand ownership, customers becoming marketers, pre-factual ownership, pseudo endowment effect, etc. However, because there has not been unified appellation and measurement of the concept for a long time, no real research progress has been achieved in this field except some sporadic mention of the phenomenon. Breakthrough progress in research on customer psychological ownership hasn’t been made until the concept of psychological ownership was clearly defined, measured and empirically researched in organizational behavior domain. Such progress stimulates empirical research on customer psychological ownership which in turn deeply affects research on product valuation and customer relationship. In general, customer psychological ownership is considered to be a single dimensional concept involving product psychological ownership and brand psychological ownership when referring to different objects, and involving individual psychological ownership and collective psychological ownership when referring to different subjects. Measurement of customer psychological ownership is mainly based on subjects’ sense of object ownership. For example, measurement of product psychological ownership is mainly based on an individual sense of ownership and measurement of brand psychological ownership is mainly based on a collective sense of ownership. Two streams of research investigate factors influencing customer psychological ownership. On the one hand, based on the roots of psychological ownership in Pierce etc （2003）’s theoretical framework, impacts of control, self-investment and sense of belonging on customer psychological ownership are studied. On the other hand, based on the similarity between psychological ownership and endowment effects, impacts of related factors of legal ownership are studied, such as ownership duration, value ranking （ascending or descending）, exchange experience and focuses （money or product benefits）. The effect of customer psychological ownership is reflected in two aspects: increasing product valuation and enhancing positive attitude and positive behavior. On the one hand, from the endowment effect perspective, research focusing on exchange marketing indicates that customer psychological ownership has a positive impact on valuation and willingness to pay. On the other hand, from the perspective of possession psychology, research indicates that customer psychological ownership has a positive impact on product attitude, product attachment, customer engagement, customer loyalty and customer citizenship behavior. Through a critical review of the relevant literature on customer psychological ownership, we find that although some progress is achieved in this field, there exist many problems that need to be resolved by future research, for example, the disagreement on the definition and measurement of customer psychological ownership, lack of research on some important antecedents and outcomes, lack of research on how to establish customer psychological ownership in local product branding, product customization, advertising and B2B relationship.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Literature Review of Customer Psychological Ownership and Prospects
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 02, pp. 105 - 122 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.02.008
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Acharya C, Elliott G. Consumer ethnocentrism, perceived product quality and choice-an empirical investigation[J]. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 2003, 15(4): 87-115.
[2] Ariely D, Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003, 13(1-2): 113-123.
[3] Aron A, Lewandowski Jr G W, Mashek D, et al. The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships[A]. Simpson J A, Campbell L. The Oxford handbook of close relationships[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[4] Asatryan V S, Oh H. Psychological ownership theory: An exploratory application in the restaurant industry[J]. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 2008, 32(3): 363-386.
[5] Avey J B, Avolio B J, Crossley C D, et al. Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2009, 30(2): 173-191.
[6] Beggan J K. Using what you own to get what you need: The role of possessions in satisfying control motivation[J]. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1991, 6(6): 129-146.
[7] Beggan J K. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62(2): 229-237.
[8] Belk R W. Possessions and the extended self[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15(2): 139-168.
[9] Bi X G, Gunessee S, Hoffmann R, et al. Chinese consumer ethnocentrism: A field experiment[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2012, 11(3): 252-263.
[10] Bowen J T, Shoemaker S. Loyalty: A strategic commitment[J]. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 1998, 39(1): 12-25.
[11] Brasel S A, Gips J. Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2014, 24(2): 226-233.
[12] Brendl C M, Chattopadhyay A, Pelham B W, et al. Name letter branding: Valence transfers when product specific needs are active[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2005, 32(3): 405-415.
[13] Carmon Z, Ariely D. Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2000, 27(3): 360-370.
[14] Chatterjee P, Irmak C, Rose R L. The endowment effect as self-enhancement in response to threat[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2013, 40(3): 460-476.
[15] Chen Hao, Zhang Jia-wei. Psychological ownership from individuals to groups: Research frontier of collective psychological ownership[J]. Social Work & Management, 2016, 16(2): 89-96.
[16] Claus B, Vanhouche W, Dewitte S, et al. Walk a mile in my shoes: Psychological ownership and psychological distance[A]. Gürhan-Canli Z, Otnes C, Zhu R. NA-Advances in consumer research[C]. Duluth, MN: Advances in Consumer Research, 2012, 40: 1067-1068.
[17] Coulter K S, Grewal D. Name-letters and birthday-numbers: Implicit egotism effects in pricing[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2014, 78(3): 102-120.
[18] Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[19] Dittmar H. The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be[M]. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
[20] Dittmar H. Material and consumer identities[A]. Schwartz S J, Luyckx K, Vignoles V L. Handbook of identity theory and research[C]. New York, NY: Springer, 2011: 745-769.
[21] Erikson E H. Youth: Identity or crisis?[M]. New York: Norton, 1968.
[22] Escalas J E, Bettman J R. You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers' connections to brands[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003, 13(3): 339-348.
[23] Folse J A G, Moulard J G, Julie R D. Psychological ownership: A social marketing advertising message appeal? Not for women[J]. International Journal of Advertising, 2012, 31(2): 291-315.
[24] Franke N, Schreier M. Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization[J]. Marketing Letters, 2008, 19(2): 93-107.
[25] Franke N, Schreier M, Kaiser U. The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(1): 125-140.
[26] Fuchs C, Prandelli E, Schreier M. The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers' product demand[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74(1): 65-79.
[27] Furby L. Possessions: Toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle[A]. Bates P B. Life span development and behavior[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1978a, 1: 297-336.
[28] Furby L. Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation[J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 1978b, 6(1): 49-65.
[29] Furby L. Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and an appraisal of our progress[J]. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1991, 6(6): 457-463.
[30] Griffin J. Customer loyalty: How to earn it, how to keep it[M]. New York: Lexington, 1995.
[31] Han Xiaoyun, Yu Cezheng. Customer engagement: Psychological antecedents and its effects on customer loyalty[J].Journal of Marketing Science, 2013, 9(1): 99-110.
[32] Hansen J, Wänke M. The abstractness of luxury[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2011, 32(5): 789-796.
[33] Heskett J L. Beyond customer loyalty[J]. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 2002, 12(6): 355-357.
[34] Heskett J L, Sasser W E, Wheeler J. The ownership quotient: Putting the service profit chain to work for unbeatable competitive advantage[M]. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press, 2008.
[35] James W. The principles of psychology[M]. New York: Holt, 1890.
[36] Johnson E J, Häubl G, Keinan A. Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007, 33(3): 461-474.
[37] Jussila I, Tarkiainen A, Sarstedt M, et al. Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 121-139.
[38] Kamleitner B, Erki B. Payment method and perceptions of ownership[J]. Marketing Letters, 2013, 24(1): 57-69.
[39] Kamleitner B, Feuchtl S. “As if it were mine”: Imagery works by inducing psychological ownership[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 208-223.
[40] Karahanna E, Xu S X, Zhang N. Psychological ownership motivation and use of social media[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 185-207.
[41] Kirk C P, Swain S D. Interactivity and psychological ownership in consumer value co-creation[A]. Kubacki K. Ideas in marketing: Finding the new and polishing the old[C]. Cham: Springer, 2015: 121.
[42] Kirk C P, Swain S D, Gaskin J E. I’m proud of it: Consumer technology appropriation and psychological ownership[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 166-184.
[43] Kou Y, Liu Y, Zhou L, et al. The name-letter effect in mass customization: Mediating role of psychological ownership[R]. working paper, 2017.
[44] Kou Y, Powpaka S. Why friends pay more: An alternative explanation based on self-expansion motives[J]. Social Behavior & Personality, 2017, 45(9): 1537-1552.
[45] Kozinets R V. E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption[J]. European Management Journal, 1999, 17(3): 252-264.
[46] Kozinets R V. Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2002, 29(1): 20-38.
[47] Kron J. Home-psych: The social psychology of home and decoration[M]. New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1983.
[48] Leary M R, Tangney J P. Handbook of self and identity[M]. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press, 2013.
[49] Lee J, Suh A. How do virtual community members develop psychological ownership and what are the effects of psychological ownership in virtual communities?[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 45: 382-391.
[50] Lessard-Bonaventure S, Chebat J C. Psychological ownership, touch, and willingness to pay for an extended warranty[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 224-234.
[51] Li Rui, Ling Wenquan, Liu Shishun. The antecedents and outcomes of psychological ownership for the organization: An analysis from the perspective of person-situation interactions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 44(9): 1202-1216.
[52] List J A. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118(1): 41-71.
[53] Litwinski L. Is there an instinct of possession?[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1942, 33(1): 28-39.
[54] Long Yifei, Yang Jianwen. On the concept of proprietary right[J]. Law Science Magazine, 2008(2): 70-73.
[55] McAlexander J H, Schouten J W. Brandfests: Servicescapes for the cultivation of brand equity[A]. Sherry Jr J F. Servicescapes: The concept of place in contemporary markets[C]. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1998: 377-301.
[56] McCracken G. Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1986, 13(1): 71-84.
[57] Monger J E, Feinberg R A. Mode of payment and formation of reference prices[J]. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 1997, 5(4): 142-147.
[58] Moon J. The role of psychological ownership and social identity in e-business: Strategies for building e-loyalty towards blog services[D]. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2006.
[59] Moore D J, Homer P M. Self-brand connections: The role of attitude strength and autobiographical memory primes[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2008, 61(7): 707-714.
[60] Morewedge C K, Shu L L, Gilbert D T, et al. Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45(4): 947-951.
[61] Muñiz Jr A M, O'Guinn T C. Brand community[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2001, 27(4): 412-432.
[62] Muñiz Jr A M, Schau H J. Religiosity in the abandoned apple newton brand community[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2005, 31(4): 737-747.
[63] Nuttin Jr J M. Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1987, 17(4): 381-402.
[64] Park C W, MacInnis D J, Priester J, et al. Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74(6): 1-17.
[65] Peck J, Shu S B. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36(3): 434-447.
[66] Peck J, Barger V A, Webb A. In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2013, 23(2): 189-196.
[67] Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks K T. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(2): 298-310.
[68] Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks K T. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2003, 7(1): 84-107.
[69] Pierce J L, O'Driscoll M P, Coghlan A M. Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control[J]. Journal of Social Psychology, 2004, 144(5): 507-534.
[70] Porteous J D. Home: The territorial core[J]. Geographical Review, 1976, 66(4): 383-390.
[71] Prelec D, Simester D. Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay[J]. Marketing Letters, 2001, 12(1): 5-12.
[72] Raghubir P, Srivastava J. Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2008, 14(3): 213-225.
[73] Reb J, Connolly T. Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect[J]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2007, 2(2): 107-114.
[74] Rochberg-Halton E. Cultural signs and urban adaptation: The meaning of cherished household possessions[D]. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1979.
[75] Schouten J W, McAlexander J H. Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1995, 22(1): 43-61.
[76] Schwartz S J, Luyckx K, Vignoles V L. Handbook of identity theory and research[M]. New York: Springer, 2011.
[77] Sela A, Wheeler S C, Sarial-Abi G. We are not the same as you and I: Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers' attitudes toward brands[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012, 39(3): 644-661.
[78] Sharma J. Profitable customer engagement: Concepts, metrics, and strategies[J]. Journal of Marketing & Communication, 2014, 9(3): 81-82.
[79] Shimp T A, Sharma S. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987, 24(3): 280-289.
[80] Shu S B, Peck J. Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2011, 21(4): 439-452.
[81] Simonson I. Determinants of customers' responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005, 69(1): 32-45.
[82] Sinclair G, Tinson J. Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 71: 1-9.
[83] Slater J S. Collecting the real thing: A case study exploration of brand loyalty enhancement among Coca-Cola brand collectors[A]. Hoch S J, Meyer R J. Advances in consumer research [C]. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 2000, 27: 202-208.
[84] Soman D. Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2001, 27(4): 460-474.
[85] Soman D. The effect of payment transparency on consumption: Quasi-experiments from the field[J]. Marketing Letters, 2003, 14(3): 173-183.
[86] Strahilevitz M A, Loewenstein G. The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998, 25(3): 276-289.
[87] Strizhakova Y, Coulter R A. Drivers of local relative to global brand purchases: A contingency approach[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2015, 23(1): 1-22.
[88] Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980, 1(1): 39-60.
[89] Thomson M, MacInnis D J, Whan Park C. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2005, 15(1): 77-91.
[90] Truong G, Chapman C S, Chisholm J D, et al. Mine in motion: How physical actions impact the psychological sense of object ownership[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2016, 42(3): 375-385.
[91] Van Dyne L, Pierce J L. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(4): 439-459.
[92] Wang Hao, Liu Fang. Review and prospect of the research on psychological ownership theory [J]. Academic Research, 2007, (10): 70-76.
[93] White R W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence[J]. Psychological Review, 1959, 66(5): 297-330.
[94] Wilpert B. Property, ownership, and participation: On the growing contradictions between legal and psychological concepts[A]. Russell R, Rus V. International handbook of participation in organizations: For the study of organizational democracy, co-operation, and self-management[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 149-164.
[95] Zhang Depeng, Lin Mengfei, Chen xiaoyan et al. Research on the customer innovation on ｒeferral intention: The mediatingｒole of psychological ownership[J]. Management Review, 2015, 27(12): 131-140.
[96] Zhang Hui, Liu Wende. The relations between brand psychological ownership, customer engagement and self-brand connection：Using tourism brand as example[J]. Brand Research. 2016, (6): 25-38.
[97] Zhao Jianbin, Jing Fengjie. The relationship between network embeddedness and citizenship behavior in online brand community: The mediation role of psychological ownership[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2015, 12(2): 276-283.
[98] Zhao Q, Chen C D, Wang J L. The effects of psychological ownership and TAM on social media loyalty: An integrated model[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2016, 33(4): 959-972.
[99] Zhu Hang, Han Xiaoyan, Huang Ting. Family management involvement and professional managers’s psychological ownership in private business: A new explanation of sense of “us”[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2015, 18(4): 4-14.
Cite this article
Kou Yan, Gao Min, Zhu Yanhan, et al. A Literature Review of Customer Psychological Ownership and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(2): 105-122.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
