3801 
7494Gender issue is a frontier in the organization and management research. Gender with its social embeddedness is not only an important category of management research, but also an important field of management activities, so it has unique value and significance in management research. It aims to explore the impact of women physiological and gender differences in the workplace on various performance indicators in the organization. This article uses 539 papers related to gender issues published on top international management journals as the literature pool, and then combines systematic review, bibliometrics and content analysis to explore the following questions:（1）In management research, what are the characteristics of “female images”, what management phenomena and problems are reflected, and how to explain them by theories?（2）In the relevant empirical research, especially in testing causal relationships and hypotheses from theoretical explanations, how to measure and analyze gender dimension and related variables?（3）What are the conclusions and practical implications for management research? This article obtains three conclusions on female images in management research: Firstly, the bibliometric analysis of the current research shows that the literature clusters are not based on theoretical research and management phenomena, but on specific images of female characteristics. Secondly, according to the analysis of literature content, female images are divided into five types: different, invisible, paradoxical, isolated and little women, and their corresponding gender issues and theoretical explanations are combed respectively. Thirdly, the measurement method of female images includes direct gender measurement, gender match, gender change and gender ratio. The above analysis takes female images as a clue to effectively solve the problem of interdisciplinary, and establish an inclusive dialogue among diverse studies. Combined with the high degree of social construction and social embeddedness of gender research, this study believes that in the future research, we need to pay full attention to the new social phenomenon, including economic empowerment, the impact of new career types generated by the new economy, and institutional barriers, especially in non-governmental organizations and media. Revisiting gender issues in management research is instrumental to reconstruct theoretical research results from the perspective of gender equality and care. No matter from the construction of humanistic view in the management theory, the social responsibility to undertake management research to promote social harmony and sustainable development, or to do responsible management research, the conclusions output research increment and reference value both in theory and practice.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Female Images in Management Research: Based on International Journal Literature of Management
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 11, pp. 64 - 80 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200525.301
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Chen Yue, Chen Chaomei, Liu Zeyuan, et al. The methodology function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[2] Gan Weiyu, Xu Xixiong, Lin Dingjian. Executive gender, power structure and corporate unethical behavior: An empirical test based on PSM data of corporate fraud[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2015, 37(10): 18-31.
[3] Jin Jiafei, Liu Chongrui, Li Wenyong, et al. Conflict of work hours and work family: A study based on sex difference[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 44-50.
[4] Li Hai, Yao Lei, Zhang Mian, et al. Gender difference in work-family conflict crossover effects[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, 20(4): 153-164.
[5] Li Xiaorong, Liu Hang. CEO vs CFO: Gender and the risk of stock price collapse[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2012, (12): 102-129.
[6] Liu Yongli. Empirical Study of vertical dyad linkage characteristics in management group on accounting conservatism[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2014, 17(2): 107-116, 128.
[7] Pan Ancheng, Xiao Yujia. Under one roof: Maintenance of copreneurial relationship and model of copreneurship[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, 20(5): 56-68.
[8] Wei Huimin, Liu Hong. Review of the influencing factors of work-family role transition[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2011, 33(3): 50-57.
[9] Wu Xintong, Chen Jin. Deconstruction and reconstruction of innovation management paradigm: Fom the perspective of gender[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(9): 1671-1679, 1693.
[10] Wu Xintong, Chen Jin, Liang Lin. The logic of gendered innovation: Sex and gender analysis in scientific research[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(9): 1659-1667.
[11] Wu Xintong, Chen Jin, Mei Liang, et al. Gender stereotype: The threat or opportunity for female innovators in technological innovation?[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(11): 45-60.
[12] Anne S. Tsui. Responsible research in management: Philosophy and practice[M]. Peking University Press, 2018.
[13] Adams R B, Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 94(2): 291-309.
[14] Ahl H. Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006, 30(5): 595-621.
[15] Aldrich H E, Kenworthy A L. The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings[A]. Baum J A C, McKelvey B. Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell[C]. Washington: Sage Publications, Inc., 1999.
[16] Barnett F, Barnett S. Working together: Entrepreneurial couples[M]. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1988.
[17] Baxter J, Hewitt B. Negotiating domestic labor: Women’s earnings and housework time in Australia[J]. Feminist Economics, 2013, 19(1): 29-53.
[18] Bird B, Brush C. A gendered perspective on organizational creation[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002, 26(3): 41-65.
[19] Briscoe F, Joshi A. Bringing the boss’s politics in: Supervisor political ideology and the gender gap in earnings[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(4): 1415-1441.
[20] Broadbridge A, Simpson R. 25 years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research[J]. British Journal of Management, 2011, 22(3): 470-483.
[21] Coleman S. Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2000, 38(3): 37-52.
[22] Craig L, Powell A. Non-standard work schedules, work-family balance and the gendered division of childcare[J]. Work, Employment and Society, 2011, 25(2): 274-291.
[23] Craig L, Powell A, Cortis N. Self-employment, work-family time and the gender division of labour[J]. Work, Employment and Society, 2012, 26(5): 716-734.
[24] Dawley D, Hoffman J J, Smith A R. Leader succession: Does gender matter?[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2004, 25(8): 678-690.
[25] Dezsö C L, Ross D G. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9): 1072-1089.
[26] Eagly A H. The science and politics of comparing women and men[J]. American Psychologist, 1995, 50(3): 145-158.
[27] Eagly A H. Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions[J]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2007, 31(1): 1-12.
[28] Eagly A H, Carli L L. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2003a, 14(6): 807-834.
[29] Eagly A H, Carli L L. Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2003b, 14(6): 851-859.
[30] Eagly A H, Johannesen-Schmidt M C. The leadership styles of women and men[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2001, 57(4): 781-797.
[31] Eagly A H, Johannesen-Schmidt M C, Van Engen M L. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(4): 569-591.
[32] Eagly A H, Karau S J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders[J]. Psychological Review, 2002, 109(3): 573-598.
[33] Eagly A H, Makhijani M G, Klonsky B G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, 111(1): 3-22.
[34] Ely R, Padavic I. A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1121-1143.
[35] Fiol C M, Pratt M G, O’Connor E J. Managing intractable identity conflicts[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(1): 32-55.
[36] Flynn M. Who would delay retirement? Typologies of older workers[J]. Personnel Review, 2010, 39(3): 308-324.
[37] Ford J, Collinson D. In search of the perfect manager? Work-life balance and managerial work[J]. Work, Employment and Society, 2011, 25(2): 257-273.
[38] Franceschet S, Piscopo J M. Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina[J]. Politics & Gender, 2008, 4(3): 393-425.
[39] Francis B, Hasan I, Wu Q. The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting[J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2013, 28(1): 53-78.
[40] Greenhaus J H, Beutell N J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(1): 76-88.
[41] Greenhaus J H, Powell G N. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(1): 72-92.
[42] Gregory-Smith I, Main B G M, O’Reilly Ⅲ C A. Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender[J]. The Economic Journal, 2014, 124(574): F109-F128.
[43] Haslam S A, Reicher S D, Platow M J. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.
[44] Hatmaker D M. Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers[J]. Gender, Work & Organization, 2013, 20(4): 382-396.
[45] Heilman M E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2012, 32: 113-135.
[46] Heilman M E, Okimoto T G. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(1): 81-92.
[47] Hughes K D, Jennings J E, Brush C, et al. Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(3): 429-442.
[48] Joshi A, Neely B, Emrich C, et al. Gender research in AMJ: An overview of five decades of empirical research and calls to action[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(5): 1459-1475.
[49] Jyrkinen M, McKie L. Gender, age and ageism: Experiences of women managers in Finland and Scotland[J]. Work, Employment and Society, 2012, 26(1): 61-77.
[50] Knouse S B, Webb S C. Virtual networking for women and minorities[J]. Career Development International, 2001, 6(4): 226-229.
[51] Koenig A M, Eagly A H, Mitchell A A, et al. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(4): 616-642.
[52] Linehan M, Walsh J S. Work-family conflict and the senior female international manager[J]. British Journal of Management, 2000, 11(S1): S49-S58.
[53] Lowe K B, Kroeck K G, Sivasubramaniam N. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1996, 7(3): 385-425.
[54] Marlow S, Patton D. All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, 29(6): 717-735.
[55] McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27(1): 415-444.
[56] Moore S. “No matter what I did I would still end up in the same position”: Age as a factor defining older women’s experience of labour market participation[J]. Work, Employment and Society, 2009, 23(4): 655-671.
[57] Murray F, Graham L. Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2007, 16(4): 657-689.
[58] Ozgen E, Baron R A. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22(2): 174-192.
[59] Parker M, Welch E W. Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24(2): 332-348.
[60] Peni E, Vähämaa S. Female executives and earnings management[J]. Managerial Finance, 2010, 36(7): 629-645.
[61] Pio E, Essers C. Professional migrant women decentring otherness: A transnational perspective[J]. British Journal of Management, 2014, 25(2): 252-265.
[62] Powell G N, Butterfield D A. Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top management[J]. Women in Management Review, 2003, 18(1-2): 88-96.
[63] Powell G N, Butterfield D A, Parent J D. Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?[J]. Journal of Management, 2002, 28(2): 177-193.
[64] Powell G N, Greenhaus J H. Sex, gender, and decisions at the family→work interface[J]. Journal of Management, 2010a, 36(4): 1011-1039.
[65] Powell G N, Greenhaus J H. Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010b, 53(3): 513-534.
[66] Ridgeway C L. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[67] Ridgeway C L, Smith-Lovin L. The gender system and interaction[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, 25(1): 191-216.
[68] Rosa P, Dawson A. Gender and the commercialization of university science: Academic founders of spinout companies[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2006, 18(4): 341-366.
[69] Rosette A S, Tost L P. Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(2): 221-235.
[70] Sandberg S. Lean in-women, work and the will to lead[J]. NHRD Network Journal, 2015, 8(2): 137-139.
[71] Sarah C, Mona L K. Critical mass theory and women’s political representation[J]. Political Studies, 2008, 56(3): 725-736.
[72] Scott B A, Barnes C M. A multilevel field investigation of emotional labor, affect, work withdrawal, and gender[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(1): 116-136.
[73] Shelton L M. Female entrepreneurs, work-family conflict, and venture performance: New insights into the work-family interface[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2006, 44(2): 285-297.
[74] Sila V, Gonzalez A, Hagendorff J. Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016, 36: 26-53.
[75] Solal I, Snellman K. Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition[J]. Organization Science, 2019, 30(6): 1270-1288.
[76] Thursby J G, Thursby M C. Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2005, 30(4): 343-353.
[77] Vecchio R P. In search of gender advantage[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14(6): 835-850.
[78] Venkatesh V, Shaw J D, Sykes T A, et al. Networks, technology, and entrepreneurship: A field quasi-experiment among women in rural India[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(5): 1709-1740.
[79] Viejola S. Metaphors of mixed team play[J]. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 1994, 29(1): 31-48.
[80] Walters J, McNeely C L. Recasting title Ⅸ: Addressing gender equity in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professoriate[J]. Review of Policy Research, 2010, 27(3): 317-332.
[81] Wang M Z, Kelan E. The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 117(3): 449-466.
[82] Zhang Y, Qu H Y. The impact of CEO succession with gender change on firm performance and successor early departure: Evidence from China’s publicly listed companies in 1997-2010[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(5): 1845-1868.
[83] Zhao E Y, Wry T. Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(6): 1994-2020.
Cite this article
Wu Xintong, Chen Jin, Zhu Ziqin. Female Images in Management Research: Based on International Journal Literature of Management[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(11): 64-80.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
