Based on the theory of resource bricolage, following the logic framework of " situation—process—result”, a longitudinal single case study of SL（Group）CO., LTD. is designed to systematically induce and analyze the growth process of international entrepreneurship and the influence mechanism based on the characteristics of family firms. The study focuses on the environment, logic and mode of resource bricolage and the entrepreneurial growth of family firms, and takes the three experiences of SL’s international entrepreneurship in the process of internationalization as relatively independent but interrelated research units to construct the theoretical model of international entrepreneurial growth of family firms. The study finds that: Firstly, the resource bricolage environment and the resource endowment of family firms in the context of international entrepreneurship experience a dynamic changing process. The environmental gap between domestic and foreign countries will attract entrepreneurs to start international entrepreneurial activities, and the development of domestic industries will narrow the environmental gap, thus reducing the attraction. Meanwhile, the resource endowment of family entrepreneurs gradually increases, thus the willingness of international entrepreneurship always remain at a high level. The dominant logic of resource bricolage in international entrepreneurship follows the direction of " learning-oriented, efficiency-oriented and strategy-oriented”, forming a continuous selective bricolage. Secondly, the identification, grasp and development of international entrepreneurial opportunities, and the selection, introduction and integration of resources are an organic whole and interwoven process. In the stage of opportunity identification, entrepreneurs go through the selection process from experience-based to network-based to strategy-based. In the process of seizing the opportunity, staged bricolage strategies by means of mode innovation in joint venture, cooperation innovation in two generations and integration innovation in industrial chains should be formed to introduce resources. In the stage of opportunity development, entrepreneurs gradually upgrade the combination of resources from " utilization – development – integration”, among which the integration of hidden resources generates more sustainable resource value. Thirdly, the characteristics of family firms have an important impact on international entrepreneurship in terms of entrepreneurial subjects, bricolage continuity and selectivity, which promote resource bricolage in favor of realizing family vision, controlling intentions and integrating familiness, helping to form a new orderly state and achieve growth in the process of international entrepreneurship. This study elaborates and expands the application situation, orientation and process of resource bricolage. Specifically, based on the dynamic process of different bricolage types in regional space exploration, this paper focuses on the mutual transformation, supplement and substitution between entrepreneurial behavior and bricolage; by embedding the theory of resource bricolage into the research field of family firms, the influence mechanism of the characteristics of family firms on the process of resource bricolage and the mechanism of the role of resource bricolage in promoting the growth of international entrepreneurship of family firms are clarified. The conclusions of this study provid inspiration and reference for family firms who implement international entrepreneurship while facing complex and diverse international environment and resource scarcity.
Research on the Growing Process of International Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Case Study Based on Resource Bricolage
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 41, Issue 06, pp. 105 - 125 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.06.008
 Cheng Cong, Xie Hongming, Chi Renyong. The organizational legitimacy of Chinese enterprises' transnational mergers and acquisitions: internal, external, or internal + external? [J]. Management World, 2017, (4):158-171.
 Fang Shijian, Huang Minghui. Analysis of Origins and Main Contents of Entrepreneurial Bricolage Theory and Prospects for Future Research [J]. Foreign Economics & Management， 2013, (10):2-12.
 Li Xinchun, Ye Wenping, Zhu Hang. Trapped in or Free from the Cage: The Relationship between Regional Guanxi Culture and Guanxi Strategy of Entrepreneurial Firms[J]. Management World, 2016, (10) :88-102.
 Liang Qiang, Luo Yingguang, Xie Shunlong. A Review of Studies of Value Creation of Entrepreneurial Resources from a Bricolage Perspective and Future Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2013, (5): 14-21.
 Peng Xinmin, Wu Xiaobo, Wu Dong. The Evolution of Enterprise Networks Based on the Dynamic Process of the Second Innovation and the Evolution of the Balance Model of the Organizational Learning-A Case Study on Haitian in 1971～2010[J]. Management World, 2011, (4):138-149.
 Peng Xinmin, Zheng Suli, Wu Xiaobo, et al. How do latecomers catch up with the frontier? -- perspective of dual learning[J]. Management World, 2017, (2): 142-158.
 Su Fang, Mao Jiye, Xie Weihong. The Bricolage Process of Resource-poor Firms in Response to Environment Changes [J]. Management World, 2016, (8) :137-149.
 Su Jingqin, Lin JingJing. Independent Innovation of State-owned Enterprises：Are There Other Contextual Factors Except Political Identity？[J]. Management Review, 2016, (3) :230-240
 Wang Yangmei. A Pyramid Model of Successor’s Entrepreneurial Growth in Family Firms: Multi-case Study from the Perspective of Meaning Making [J]. Management World, 2019, (2):168-184.
 Wang Yimin, Liang Shu, Zhao Zhibin. A Review of Frontier Research of Internationalization Speed: Building Theoretical Model from the Perspective of Overall Process [J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, (9):98-112.
 Yang Jianfeng, Meng Xiaobin, Wang Zhongming. The influence of the characteristics of family business on its internationalization process–a discussion based on the perspective of organizational learning [J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2008, (4):39-46.
 Yu Xiaoyu, Li Yajie, Tao Xiangming. Literature Review on Entrepreneurial Bricolage and a Research Agenda [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017, (2):306 -316.
 Zhu Zhenduo, Li Xinchun. A Growth Strategy for New Ventures: A Literature Review of Resource Bricolage and Prospects [J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2016, (11):71-82.
 Cunha M P E, Rego A, Oliveira P, et al. Product innovation in resource-poor environments: Three research streams[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2):202-210.
 Desa G, Basu S. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013,7(1):26-49.
 Engel Y, Kaandorp M, Elfring T. Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017,32(1):35-51.
 Fatoki O, Patswawairi T. The motivations and obstacles to immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2012,32(2):133-142.
 Geoffrey D, Sandip B. Optimization or bricolage? overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013,7(1):26-49.
 Holt D T. Strategic decisions within family firms: Understanding the controlling family’s receptivity to internationalization[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(6):1145-1151.
 Jennings J E, Brush C G. Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature?[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2013, 7(1):663-715.
 Lee K, Malerba F. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems[J]. Research Policy, 2017,46(2):338-351
 Mazzei M J, Ketchen D J Jr, Shook C L. Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: A “theoretical toolbox” approach[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2017,13(2): 631-663.
 Molecke G, Pinkse J. Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017,32(5):550-568.
 Perkmann M, Spicer A. How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage[J]. Organization Science, 2014,25(6):1785-1806.
 Perry-Smith J E, Mannucci P V. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2015,42(1):53-79.
 Randerson K, Bettinelli C, Fayolle A, Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: Exploring its contours and contents[J]. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2015,6(3):143-154.
 Salunke S, Weerawardena J, McColl-Kennedy J R. Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013,66(8):1085-1097.
 Senyard J, Baker T, Steffens P, et al. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014,31(2):211-230.
 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2003,27(4): 339-358.
 Solesvik M Z, Westhead P, Kolvereid L , et al. Student intentions to become self-employed: the Ukrainian context[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2012, 19(3):441-460.
 Wright M，Stigliani I. Entrepreneurship and growth[J]. International Small Business Journal, 2013, 31(1): 1-33.
 Ye G L, Priem R L, Alshwer A A. Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities[J]. Organization Science, 2012,23(1):207-224.
Cite this article
Wang Yangmei, Wu Qi, Luo Jingtao. Research on the Growing Process of International Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Case Study Based on Resource Bricolage[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(6): 105-125.