Nowadays, work is becoming more team-oriented and flexible. Organizations hope and need employees to help each other, cooperate and share in their work, and devote more energy to the overall interests of organizations beyond the completion of their own work. Prosocial behavior has gradually become an important hot topic in the field of organizational behavior. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of prosocial behavior and achieved some results, but the overall dispersion hinders the development of prosocial behavior research. Therefore, this paper systematically reviews the relevant literature, including the definition of prosocial behavior, similar concepts, measurement methods, antecedents, results, research prospects and practical enlightenment, so as to present a clear and complete development framework, deepen the understanding of prosocial behavior, and provide inspiration for relevant domestic research. More importantly, it can provide reference for the practice of organizational management. Specifically, prosocial behavior in organizations refers to the acts that promote or protect the welfare of individuals, groups and organizations, which is unlike pro-organizational behavior, altruistic behavior and proactive behavior. In the past, OCB is often regarded as the prototypical prosocial behavior. Over the years, with the development of academics, organizational researchers have identified a number of other constructs that are consistent with the definition of prosocial behavior in that they are acts benefiting others: mentoring, knowledge sharing, brokering introductions, and compassion, etc. Based on the extensive independent researches and meta-analysis results of prosocial behavior in China and abroad in recent years, we can see that scale and experiment are the main methods of prosocial behavior measurement. It is worth learning that some scholars combine the two methods in their studies. At the individual level, prosocial behavior is beneficial to employees’ working attitude, performance and career success; at the organizational level, prosocial behavior can promote the innovation of organizations, decrease the turnover rate of the staff, and improve the effectiveness of organizations. However, some studies also show that prosocial behavior can lead to negative effects. The factors that influence prosocial behavior are personality traits, peers, leadership and job characteristics, etc. On the above basis, this paper constructs a prosocial behavior cycle management mechanism, which integrates specific measures to stimulate prosocial behavior into human resource management practice such as recruitment and selection, training, performance appraisal, salary incentives, job design, etc. It is suggested that future theoretical research should focus on the measurement tools, impact mechanism, non-linear impact and local research of prosocial behavior, while management practice should focus on the identification, evaluation and intervention of prosocial behavior.
Prosocial Behavior in Organizations: A Literature Review and Prospects
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 41, Issue 05, pp. 114 - 127 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.05.009
 Cai Wei, Wu Song, Kou Yu. Power and prosocial behaviour: How and why power affects prosocial behaviour[J]. Advances in Psychological Science，2016, 24(1): 120-131.
 Chen Chen, Yang Fu, Li Yongqiang. Workplace ostracism: A review on mechanisms and localization development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science，2017, 25(8): 1387-1400.
 Lu Junting, Zhang Zhe, Jia Ming. Servant Leadership and Employee Creativity: A Mediated Moderation Model[J]. Forecasting，2017(a), 36(6): 9-15.
 Lu Junting, Zhang Zhe, Jia Ming. The Cross-level Effects of Servant Leadership on Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Mediated Moderating Model[J]. Management Review，2017(b), 29(7): 187-199.
 Tao Houyong, Zhang Juan, Li Ling. Study on the Influence of Differential Leadership on Employees’ Prosocial Organizational Behavior[J]. China Industrial Economics，2016, (3): 114-129.
 Wu Shijian, Sun Zhuanzhuan, Liu Xinmin. The Multiple Mediating Effects of Knowledge Governance and Organizational Learning on Organizational Creativity[J]. China Soft Science，2017, (6): 174-183.
 Xie Xiaofei, Wang Yilu, Gu Siyi, et al. Is altruism just other-benefiting? A dual pathway model from an evolutionary perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science，2017, 25(9): 1441-1455.
 Zhou Ruyi, Long Lirong. Self-sacrificial Leadership: A literature Review and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management，2017, 39(11): 77-89.
 Xu Xingchun, Li Zhenzhen. A Review on the Relationship between Gratitude and Pro-social Behavior[J]. Psychological Research，2016, 9(2): 3-8.
 Bolino M C, Grant A M. The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and Impact in Organizations[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2016, 10(1): 599-670.
 Chancellor J, Margolis S, Jacobs Bao K, et al. Everyday prosociality in the workplace: The reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing[J]. Emotion, 2018, 18(4): 507-517.
 Cheng J W, Seih Y T, Hung C Z, et al. Voice behavior and career success: The moderating role of supervisor attribution motives[J]. Universal Journal of Psychology, 2016, 4(4): 209-214.
 Choudhary S, Ismail A, Hanif R. Individual compassion leading to employees’ performance: An empirical study from Pakistan[J]. Journal of Management and Research, 2017, 4(1): 114-148.
 Gerke A, Dickson G, Desbordes M, et al. The role of interorganizational citizenship behaviors in the innovation process[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 73: 55-64.
 Habashi M M, Graziano W G, Hoover A E. Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2016, 42(9): 1177-1192.
 He W, Zhou R Y, Long L R, et al. Self-sacrificial leadership and followers’ affiliative and challenging citizenship behaviors: A relational self-concept based study in China[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2018, 14(1): 105-133.
 Henttonen K, Kianto A, Ritala P. Knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study of a public sector organisation[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2016, 20(4): 749-768.
 Jiang Z, Hu X W. Knowledge sharing and life satisfaction: The roles of colleague relationships and gender[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2016, 126(1): 379-394.
 Kline R, Bankert A, Levitan L, et al. Personality and prosocial behavior: A multilevel meta-analysis[J]. Political Science Research and Methods, 2019, 7(1): 125-142.
 Koopman J, Lanaj K, Scott B A. Integrating the bright and dark sides of ocb: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(2): 414-435.
 Mok A, De Cremer D. The bonding effect of money in the workplace: Priming money weakens the negative relationship between ostracism and prosocial behaviour[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2016, 25(2): 272-286.
 Park J H, Newman A, Zhang L L, et al. Mentoring functions and turnover intention: The mediating role of perceived organizational support[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2016, 27(11): 1173-1191.
 Shah N P, Cross R, Levin D Z. Performance benefits from providing assistance in networks: Relationships that generate learning[J]. Journal of Management, 2018, 44(2): 412-444.
 Wesche J S, Teichmann E. Status matters: The moderating role of perceived newcomer status in leader and coworker influences on challenging organizational citizenship behaviour[J]. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 2016, 30(3-4): 267-286.
Cite this article
Peng Xiaoping, Tian Xizhou, Guo Xiaodong. Prosocial Behavior in Organizations: A Literature Review and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(5): 114-127.
Previous: To Be Underdogs or Top Dogs? The Brand Biography and Consumers’ Brand Attitude: The Mediation Role of Empathy