3866 
3931法治是治国理政的基本方式，而法官异地交流则是新时代依法治国的一项重要举措。文章将中国省级高院院长异地任职交流活动作为准自然实验情境，考察诉讼风险对资本结构的影响，结果显示，法官异地交流会增加公司的诉讼风险，引发公司增加财务灵活性的动机，从而降低公司目前的债务水平。文章使用双重差分方法的检验结果也表明，诉讼风险导致公司债务水平降低了4.67%；特别是当公司所在行业的诉讼率较高、所在地市场化程度较低以及面临的融资约束程度较大时，诉讼风险对其债务水平的负向影响更大。这一研究结果不仅从公司财务决策的角度为法官异地交流的经济后果提供了新的经验证据，而且对于国家依法治国战略与提高司法公正性具有一定的启示意义。
诉讼风险与公司资本结构——基于法官异地交流的准自然实验
摘要
参考文献
10 牛斐. 国有企业软预算约束对资本结构的影响研究[J]. 管理世界,2018,(9). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.09.008
12 王小鲁, 樊纲, 余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告（2016）[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017.
13 王彦超,姜国华,辛清泉. 诉讼风险、法制环境与债务成本[J]. 会计研究,2016,(6). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2016.06.012
15 Allen F,Qian J,Qian M J. Law,finance,and economic growth in China[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2005,77(1):57–116. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010
19 Conti R,Valentini G. Super partes?Assessing the effect of judicial independence on entry[J]. Management Science,2018,64(8):3517–3535. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2794
20 DeAngelo H,DeAngelo L,Whited T M. Capital structure dynamics and transitory debt[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,99(2):235–261. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.09.005
21 Dessaint O,Golubov A,Volpin P. Employment protection and takeovers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2017,125(2):369–388. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.05.005
22 Fernandes A P,Ferreira P. Financing constraints and fixed-term employment:Evidence from the 2008-9 financial crisis[J]. European Economic Review,2017,92:215–238. DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.12.009
23 Francis J,Philbrick D,Schipper K. Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,1994,32(2):137–164. DOI:10.2307/2491279
24 Glaeser E L,Saks R E. Corruption in America[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2006,90(6–7):1053–1072. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.007
25 Hadlock C J,Pierce J R. New evidence on measuring financial constraints:Moving beyond the KZ index[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2010,23(5):1909–1940. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhq009
26 Hoberg G,Phillips G,Prabhala N. Product market threats,payouts,and financial flexibility[J]. The Journal of Finance,2014,69(1):293–324. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12050
27 Kim I,Skinner D J. Measuring securities litigation risk[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2012,53(1–2):290–310. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005
28 Klasa S,Ortiz-Molina H,Serfling M,et al. Protection of trade secrets and capital structure decisions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2018,128(2):266–286. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.008
29 Law K K F,Mills L F. Taxes and financial constraints:Evidence from linguistic cues[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2015,53(4):777–819. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12081
30 Petersen M A. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets:Comparing approaches[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(1):435–480. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhn053
31 Poitevin M. Financial signaling and the “deep-pocket” argument[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics,1989,20(1):26–40. DOI:10.2307/2555649
32 Roberts M R,Whited T M. Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance[J]. Handbook of the Economics of Finance,2013,2:493–572. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-44-453594-8.00007-0
33 Serfling M. Firing costs and capital structure decisions[J]. The Journal of Finance,2016,71(5):2239–2286. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12403
34 Telser L G. Competition and the core[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1996,104(1):85–107. DOI:10.1086/262018
35 Valta P. Competition and the cost of debt[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2012,105(3):661–682. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.004
引用本文
陈胜蓝, 王璟, 李然. 诉讼风险与公司资本结构——基于法官异地交流的准自然实验[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2020, 22(2): 69-80.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：仲裁合意争议司法审查研究
