3807 
3763交易所网络互动平台是证交所构建的基于投资者与上市公司互动式沟通的新型投资者关系管理模式，也是公司履行信息披露责任的重要渠道。文章基于中国资本市场上特有的制度背景，考察网络平台互动是否存在治理效应。研究发现：网络平台互动强度越高，未来股价崩盘风险越低；作用渠道检验表明，网络平台互动强度通过提高信息透明度进而缓解股价崩盘风险；当上市公司回复越及时、回复字数越多时，两者负向关系更显著。拓展性分析表明，在分析师关注较低、媒体关注较低以及由非四大会计师事务所审计等外部信息环境较弱时，交易所网络互动平台能够发挥传统外部中介的补充治理效应；网络平台互动中管理层风险信息和竞争文化信息披露也能起到缓解股价崩盘风险的效果。文章从交易所网络互动平台的治理角度为推动我国资本市场效率提升、信息化视角下上市公司的信息披露监管转型提供了“落脚点”。
交易所网络平台互动能缓解股价崩盘风险吗？——基于管理层回复质量的异质性角度
摘要
参考文献
5 丁慧, 吕长江, 陈运佳. 投资者信息能力: 意见分歧与股价崩盘风险——来自社交媒体“上证e互动”的证据[J]. 管理世界,2018,(9). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.09.008
10 高敬忠, 杨朝, 彭正银. 网络平台互动能够缓解企业融资约束吗——来自交易所互动平台问答的证据[J]. 会计研究,2021,(6). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.06.002
31 An Z, Chen C, Naiker V, et al. Does media coverage deter firms from withholding bad news? Evidence from stock price crash risk[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2020,64:101664. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101664
32 Campbell J L, Chen H, Dhaliwal D S, et al. The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2014,19(1):396–455. DOI:10.1007/s11142-013-9258-3
33 Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L. Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(6):2213–2253. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.x
34 Fiordelisi F, Ricci O. Corporate culture and CEO turnover[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2014,28:66–82. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.009
35 Gu L L, Liu J Y, Peng Y C. Locality stereotype, CEO trustworthiness and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2022,175(4):773–797. DOI:10.1007/s10551-020-04631-0
36 Heinle M S, Smith K C. A theory of risk disclosure[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2017,22(4):1459–1491. DOI:10.1007/s11142-017-9414-2
37 Jebran K, Chen S H, Zhang R B. Board diversity and stock price crash risk[J]. Research in International Business and Finance,2020,51:101122. DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101122
38 Jin L, Myers S C. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,79(2):257–292. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003
40 Kim J B, Zhang L D. Financial reporting opacity and expected crash risk: Evidence from implied volatility smirks[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2014,31(3):851–875. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12048
41 Kong D M, Shi L, Zhang F. Explain or conceal? Causal language intensity in annual report and stock price crash risk[J]. Economic Modelling,2021,94:715–725. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.013
42 Liu Z W, Park S. What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites[J]. Tourism Management,2015,47:140–151. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020
43 Long W B, Tian G G, Hu J, et al. Bearing an imprint: CEOs' early-life experience of the great Chinese famine and stock price crash risk[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis,2020,70:101510. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101510
44 Mayer R C, Davis J H, Schoorman F D. An integrative model of organizational trust[J]. The Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):709–734. DOI:10.2307/258792
45 Miller G S, Skinner D J. The evolving disclosure landscape: How changes in technology, the media, and capital markets are affecting disclosure[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2015,53(2):221–239. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12075
46 Pan Y, Zhang J Q. Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews[J]. Journal of Retailing,2011,87(4):598–612. DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.05.002
47 Qayyum A, Rehman I U, Shahzad F, et al. Board gender diversity and stock price crash risk: Going beyond tokenism[J]. Borsa Istanbul Review,2021,21(3):269–280. DOI:10.1016/j.bir.2020.10.010
48 Wu S F, Fang C Y, Chen W. Corporate governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Taiwan[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2020,41(7):1312–1326. DOI:10.1002/mde.3177
引用本文
陈华, 孙汉, 沈胤鸿. 交易所网络平台互动能缓解股价崩盘风险吗？——基于管理层回复质量的异质性角度[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2022, 24(3): 92-107.
导出参考文献，格式为：
