浪漫关系或婚姻关系对人类而言是非常重要的人际关系,可以为个体提供情感和社会支持,对人类繁衍具有重要作用。近年来,学者们从进化心理学等相关视角,逐步揭示、深化和厘清了个体获取或维系配偶的策略及相关消费行为。通过文献梳理,首先本文通过构建配偶策略系统系统地总结了配偶策略与相关消费行为,配偶策略系统包括浪漫关系形成阶段的配偶选择策略、配偶吸引策略和配偶竞争策略,以及浪漫关系维系阶段的配偶维系策略,特定的配偶策略促使消费者采取特定的消费行为以达到相应的进化适应目的。其次,本文阐释了促发配偶策略系统的外部环境因素和个体因素,不同的外部环境因素和个体因素分别通过影响配偶选择、配偶吸引、配偶竞争和配偶维系等配偶策略来影响相关的消费行为。最后,本文认为未来的研究可以进一步丰富配偶策略系统与相应的消费表征,深入探究配偶策略系统的影响因素,并探究配偶策略系统如何影响与配偶获取或维系无关的消费行为。
配偶策略系统对消费行为的影响
摘要
参考文献
6 袁少锋. 进化需求对消费者购买决策的影响研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2014, 36(1): 46-54. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2014.01.009
9 中华人民共和国民政部. 2020年民政事业发展统计公报[EB/OL]. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/202109/20210900036577.shtml, 2021-09-10.
11 Ackerman J M, Maner J K, Carpenter S M. Going all in: Unfavorable sex ratios attenuate choice diversification[J]. Psychological Science,2016, 27(6): 799-809. DOI:10.1177/0956797616636631
12 Angrist J. How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2002, 117(3): 997-1038. DOI:10.1162/003355302760193940
15 Beall A T, Tracy J L. Women are more likely to wear red or pink at peak fertility[J]. Psychological Science,2013, 24(9): 1837-1841. DOI:10.1177/0956797613476045
17 Bradshaw H K, Rodeheffer C D, Hill S E. Scarcity, sex, and spending: Recession cues increase women’s desire for men owning luxury products and men’s desire to buy them[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 561-568. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.021
18 Burtăverde V, Ene C. The influence of environmental and social characteristics on women’s mate preferences[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2021, 175: 110736. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110736
21 Buss D M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures[J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1989, 12(1): 1-14. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00023992
26 Buss D M, Foley P. Mating and marketing[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 492-497. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.034
27 Buss D M, Goetz C, Duntley J D, et al. The mate switching hypothesis[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2017, 104: 143-149. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.022
28 Buss D M, Schmitt D P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating[J]. Psychological Review,1993, 100(2): 204-232. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
31 Chisom O B. Effects of modern dating applications on healthy offline intimate relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the tinder dating application[J]. Advances in Journalism and Communication,2021, 9(1): 12-38. DOI:10.4236/ajc.2021.91002
32 Dahl D W, Sengupta J, Vohs K D. Sex in advertising: Gender differences and the role of relationship commitment[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2009, 36(2): 215-231. DOI:10.1086/597158
33 Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex[M]. London: John Murray, 1871.
35 DiBello A M, Neighbors C, Rodriguez L M, et al. Coping with jealousy: The association between maladaptive aspects of jealousy and drinking problems is mediated by drinking to cope[J]. Addictive Behaviors,2014, 39(1): 94-100. DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.032
36 Ding W, Pandelaere M, Slabbinck H, et al. Conspicuous gifting: When and why women (do not) appreciate men’s romantic luxury gifts[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2020, 87: 103945. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103945
37 Du Q Y, Wei S J. A theory of the competitive saving motive[J]. Journal of International Economics,2013, 91(2): 275-289. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.09.003
38 Durante K M, Griskevicius V, Cantú S M, et al. Money, status, and the ovulatory cycle[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2014, 51(1): 27-39. DOI:10.1509/jmr.11.0327
39 Durante K M, Griskevicius V, Hill S E, et al. Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2011, 37(6): 921-934. DOI:10.1086/656575
40 Durante K M, Griskevicius V, Simpson J A, et al. Sex ratio and women’s career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby?[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2012, 103(1): 121-134. DOI:10.1037/a0027949
41 El Hazzouri M, Main K J, Shabgard D. Reminders of the sun affect men’s preferences for luxury products[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 551-560. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.049
44 Fisher M, Cox A. Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates[J]. Personal Relationships,2011, 18(1): 20-38. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01307.x
46 Garcia-Rada X, Anik L, Ariely D. Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder[J]. Marketing Letters,2019, 30(1): 27-43. DOI:10.1007/s11002-019-09479-7
47 Greenlees I A, McGrew W C. Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements[J]. Ethology and Sociobiology,1994, 15(2): 59-72. DOI:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5
48 Griskevicius V, Ackerman J M, Cantú S M, et al. When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments[J]. Psychological Science,2013, 24(2): 197-205. DOI:10.1177/0956797612451471
49 Griskevicius V, Delton A W, Robertson T E, et al. Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2011, 100(2): 241-254. DOI:10.1037/a0021082
50 Griskevicius V, Goldstein N J, Mortensen C R, et al. Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006, 91(2): 281-294. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281
51 Griskevicius V, Kenrick D T. Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2013, 23(3): 372-386. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.003
52 Griskevicius V, Tybur J M, Ackerman J M, et al. The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2012, 102(1): 69-80. DOI:10.1037/a0024761
53 Griskevicius V, Tybur J M, Gangestad S W, et al. Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2009, 96(5): 980-994. DOI:10.1037/a0013907
54 Griskevicius V, Tybur J M, Sundie J M, et al. Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007, 93(1): 85-102. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
55 Griskevicius V, Tybur J M, Van den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2010, 98(3): 392-404. DOI:10.1037/a0017346
56 Grosjean P, Khattar R. It’s raining men! Hallelujah? The long-run consequences of male-biased sex ratios[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2019, 86(2): 723-754. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdy025
57 Gui T H. “Leftover women” or single by choice: Gender role negotiation of single professional women in contemporary China[J]. Journal of Family Issues,2020, 41(11): 1956-1978. DOI:10.1177/0192513X20943919
59 Haselton M G, Miller G F. Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence[J]. Human Nature,2006, 17(1): 50-73. DOI:10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0
60 Hasford J, Kidwell B, Lopez-Kidwell V. Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2018, 44(6): 1238-1256. DOI:10.1093/jcr/ucx093
62 Hill S E, Durante K M. Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2011, 37(3): 383-394. DOI:10.1177/0146167210395603
63 Hill S E, Rodeheffer C D, Griskevicius V, et al. Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2012, 103(2): 275-291. DOI:10.1037/a0028657
65 Jackson J J, Kirkpatrick L A. The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior,2007, 28(6): 382-391. DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005
66 Janssens K, Pandelaere M, Van den Bergh B, et al. Can buy me love: Mate attraction goals lead to perceptual readiness for status products[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2011, 47(1): 254-258. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.009
69 Kirsner B R, Figueredo A J, Jacobs W J. Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders,2003, 75(2): 131-148. DOI:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00048-4
70 Ko A, Pick C M, Kwon J Y, et al. Family matters: Rethinking the psychology of human social motivation[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2020, 15(1): 173-201. DOI:10.1177/1745691619872986
71 Koestner R, Wheeler L. Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations[J]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,1988, 5(2): 149-160. DOI:10.1177/026540758800500202
74 Lee A J, Zietsch B P. Experimental evidence that women’s mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity[J]. Biology Letters,2011, 7(6): 892-895. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454
75 Lens I, Driesmans K, Pandelaere M, et al. Would male conspicuous consumption capture the female eye? Menstrual cycle effects on women’s attention to status products[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2012, 48(1): 346-349. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.004
76 Li Y J, Kenrick D T, Griskevicius V, et al. Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2012, 102(3): 550-561. DOI:10.1037/a0025844
77 Liu W, Guo Z Y, Chen R. Lonely heart? Warm it up with love: The effect of loneliness on singles’ and non-singles’ conspicuous consumption[J]. European Journal of Marketing,2020, 54(7): 1523-1548. DOI:10.1108/EJM-01-2018-0054
78 Ma J J, Gal D. When sex and romance conflict: The effect of sexual imagery in advertising on preference for romantically linked products and services[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2016, 53(4): 479-496. DOI:10.1509/jmr.14.0374
79 Mafra A L, Varella M A C, Defelipe R P, et al. Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2020, 163: 110042. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042
80 Monga A B, Gürhan-Canli Z. The influence of mating mind-sets on brand extension evaluation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2012, 49(4): 581-593. DOI:10.1509/jmr.09.0515
81 Morris C E, Reiber C, Roman E. Quantitative sex differences in response to the dissolution of a romantic relationship[J]. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences,2015, 9(4): 270-282. DOI:10.1037/ebs0000054
82 Nepomuceno M V, Saad G, Stenstrom E, et al. Testosterone at your fingertips: Digit ratios (2D: 4D and rel 2) as predictors of courtship-related consumption intended to acquire and retain mates[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2016, 26(2): 231-244. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.007
84 Otterbring T. Healthy or wealthy? Attractive individuals induce sex-specific food preferences[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2018, 70: 11-20. DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.014
86 Panchal S, Gill T. When size does matter: Dominance versus prestige based status signaling[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 539-550. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.047
87 Park J H, Wieling M B, Buunk A P, et al. Sex-specific relationship between digit ratio (2D: 4D) and romantic jealousy[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2008, 44(4): 1039-1045. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.023
88 Parker G, Durante K M, Hill S E, et al. Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective[J]. Current Opinion in Psychology,2022, 43: 300-306. DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.020
89 Penton-Voak I S, Perrett D I. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior,2000, 21(1): 39-48. DOI:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1
92 Puts D A. Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior,2005, 26(5): 388-397. DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.001
93 Richerson R, Mead J A, Li W J. Evolutionary motives and food behavior modeling in romantic relationships[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 509-519. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.031
94 Rokach A, Brock H. Coping with loneliness[J]. The Journal of Psychology,1998, 132(1): 107-127. DOI:10.1080/00223989809599269
95 Roney J R. Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2003, 29(3): 393-404. DOI:10.1177/0146167202250221
97 Saad G. Evolutionary consumption[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2013, 23(3): 351-371. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.002
98 Saad G. The marketing of evolutionary psychology[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 485-491. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.048
100 Saad G, Stenstrom E. Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012, 22(1): 102-113. DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001
101 Schmitt D P, Buss D M. Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 80(6): 894-917. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894
102 Schoenfeld E A, Bredow C A, Huston T L. Do men and women show love differently in marriage?[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2012, 38(11): 1396-1409. DOI:10.1177/0146167212450739
103 Senyuz A, Hasford J. The allure of arrogance: How relationship formation motives enhance consumer preferences for arrogant communications[J]. Journal of Business Research,2022, 139: 106-120. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.033
104 Shanks D R, Vadillo M A, Riedel B, et al. Romance, risk, and replication: Can consumer choices and risk-taking be primed by mating motives?[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2015, 144(6): e142-e158. DOI:10.1037/xge0000116
105 Stenstrom E, Saad G, Nepomuceno M V, et al. Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D: 4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2011, 51(4): 412-416. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.003
107 Sundie J M, Kenrick D T, Griskevicius V, et al. Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2011, 100(4): 664-680. DOI:10.1037/a0021669
108 Sundie J M, Pandelaere M, Lens I, et al. Setting the bar: The influence of women’s conspicuous display on men’s affiliative behavior[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 569-585. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.039
110 Van den Bergh B, Dewitte S. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men’s decisions in ultimatum games[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2006, 273(1597): 2091-2095. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2006.3550
111 Vandenbroele J, Van Kerckhove A, Geuens M. If you work it, flaunt it: Conspicuous displays of exercise efforts increase mate value[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 120: 586-598. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.030
112 Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class[M]. New York: Dover, 1994.
113 Vohs K D, Sengupta J, Dahl D W. The price had better be right: Women’s reactions to sexual stimuli vary with market factors[J]. Psychological Science,2014, 25(1): 278-283. DOI:10.1177/0956797613502732
114 Wang Y J, Griskevicius V. Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2014, 40(5): 834-854. DOI:10.1086/673256
115 Wei S J, Zhang X B, Liu Y. Status competition and housing prices[R]. NBER Working Paper No. w18000, 2012.
116 White A E, Kenrick D T, Neel R, et al. From the bedroom to the budget deficit: Mate competition changes men’s attitudes toward economic redistribution[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2013, 105(6): 924-940. DOI:10.1037/a0033808
117 Williamson H C, Bradbury T N, Karney B R. Experiencing a natural disaster temporarily boosts relationship satisfaction in newlywed couples[J]. Psychological Science,2021, 32(11): 1709-1719. DOI:10.1177/09567976211015677
引用本文
陈瑞, 靳成雯, 张晏宁. 配偶策略系统对消费行为的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(9): 70-85.
导出参考文献,格式为:
上一篇:数字化成熟度模型:研究评述与展望
下一篇:慈善捐赠的媒体关注与企业创新