仲裁民事责任制度探析
5887 
337
上海财经大学学报 2009 年 第 11 卷第 01 期, 页码：34 - 41
摘要
参考文献
摘要
仲裁员民事责任制度可以分为"绝对豁免"、"有限豁免"、"有限责任"和"无限责任"四种模式。国外学者们普遍地支持"有限豁免"或"有限责任"的中间模式的仲裁员民事责任制度。现行《仲裁法》关于仲裁民事责任制度的内容既不明确,也很不周全,我国学者对此问题的看法存在着截然不同的分歧。笔者赞同我国实行中间模式的仲裁员民事责任制度,建议通过修订现行《仲裁法》第38条及推动人民法院采取积极的措施完善该制度。
[1]See Emmanuela Truli,Liability V.Quasi-Judicial Immunity of the Arbitrator:The Case against AbsoluteArbitral Immunity,American Reviewof International Arbitration,2006,p.387&n17.
[2]See Michael D.Moberly,Immunizing Arbitrators from Claims For equitable Relief,Pepperdine Dispute Res-olution LawJournal,2005,p.330.See also Maureen A.Weston,Reexamining Arbitral Immunityin an Ageof Mandatory and Professional Arbitration,Minnesota Law Review,February,2004,pp.493-494.
[3]See Peter B.Rutledge,Towards a Contractual Approach for Arbitral Immunity,Georgie Law Review,Fall2004,p.152,n7,n8,n74&n19.
[4]See Stephen L.Hayford&Alan R.Pal miter,Arbitration Federalism:A State Role in Commercial Arbitr-tion,Florida Law Review,April,2002,pp.221-222.
[5]参见注释[2]中Maureen A.Weston文,pp.480-481&pp.489-493.See also Robert A.Holtzman&JeffKichaven,Recent Developments in Alternative Dispute Resolution,Tort Trial&Insurance Practice LawJournal,Winter,2005,p.228。
[6]18See Susan D.Franck,The Role of International Arbitrators,ILSAJournal of International and Compara-tive Law,Spring,2006,p.517.
[7]14See Matthew Rasmussen,Overextending Immunity:Arbitral Institutional Liabilityin the United States,England,And France,FordhamInternational LawJournal,June,2003,pp.1853-1862.
[8]See Susan D.Franck,The Liability of International Arbitrators:A Comparative Analysis and Proposal forQualified Immunity,New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law,2000,p.36.Seealso Stefan Riegler,Is Austria any Different-The New Austrian Arbitration Lawin Comparison With theUncitral Model Lawand the German Arbitration Law,International Arbitration Law Review,2006,p.73.
[9]参见注释[8]中Stefan Riegler文,pp.72-73。
1017参见注释[8]中Susan D.Franck文,p.44.同时参见注释[7],pp.1861-1863.See also Philippe Fou-chard,Emmanuel Gaillard&Berthold Goldman,On International Commercial Arbitration,中信出版社2004年影印版,pp.594-596,p.623。
11See Faisal Kutty,The Shari'a Factor in International Commercial Arbitration,Loyola of Los Angeles Inter-national and Comparative Law Review,Summer2006,p.612.
12参见注释[8]中Susan D.Franck文,pp.41～46.See also David J.A.Cairns,Alejandro Lopez Ortiz,Spain’sNew Arbitration Act,International Arbitration Law Review,2004,p.43&p.39。
13Dennis R.Nolan&Roger I.Abrams,Arbitral Immunity,Industrial Relations LawJournal,1989,pp.228-265.
15See Jesmond Parke&David I.Bristow,The Gathering Stormof Arbitrators'and Mediators'Liability,Inter-national Arbitration Law Review,2001,p.135.
16参见注释[7]中文献,pp.1841-1870.See also Jane Ryland&Jane Ryland,A Comparison of the Liability ofArbitrators,Adjudicators,Experts and Advocates,Construction LawJournal,2005,p.14。
1921参见高菲著:《中国海事仲裁的理论与实践》,中国人民大学出版社1998版,第178页。同时参见阎铁毅、梁淑妍:《关于仲裁员责任制度的思考》,《中国海商法》2002年年刊,第290-292页。
20徐前权:《仲裁员法律责任之检讨——兼评“枉法仲裁罪”》(上),《仲裁研究》2006年第3期,第41-42页。
22张晓玲:《国际商事仲裁协议法律适应问题研究》,《政治与法律》2007年第1期,第119页。
23Louis A.Russo,The Consequences of Arbitrating a Legal Malpractice Claim:Rebuilding Faithin the LegalProfession,Hofstra Law Review,Fall2006,p.328.
[2]See Michael D.Moberly,Immunizing Arbitrators from Claims For equitable Relief,Pepperdine Dispute Res-olution LawJournal,2005,p.330.See also Maureen A.Weston,Reexamining Arbitral Immunityin an Ageof Mandatory and Professional Arbitration,Minnesota Law Review,February,2004,pp.493-494.
[3]See Peter B.Rutledge,Towards a Contractual Approach for Arbitral Immunity,Georgie Law Review,Fall2004,p.152,n7,n8,n74&n19.
[4]See Stephen L.Hayford&Alan R.Pal miter,Arbitration Federalism:A State Role in Commercial Arbitr-tion,Florida Law Review,April,2002,pp.221-222.
[5]参见注释[2]中Maureen A.Weston文,pp.480-481&pp.489-493.See also Robert A.Holtzman&JeffKichaven,Recent Developments in Alternative Dispute Resolution,Tort Trial&Insurance Practice LawJournal,Winter,2005,p.228。
[6]18See Susan D.Franck,The Role of International Arbitrators,ILSAJournal of International and Compara-tive Law,Spring,2006,p.517.
[7]14See Matthew Rasmussen,Overextending Immunity:Arbitral Institutional Liabilityin the United States,England,And France,FordhamInternational LawJournal,June,2003,pp.1853-1862.
[8]See Susan D.Franck,The Liability of International Arbitrators:A Comparative Analysis and Proposal forQualified Immunity,New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law,2000,p.36.Seealso Stefan Riegler,Is Austria any Different-The New Austrian Arbitration Lawin Comparison With theUncitral Model Lawand the German Arbitration Law,International Arbitration Law Review,2006,p.73.
[9]参见注释[8]中Stefan Riegler文,pp.72-73。
1017参见注释[8]中Susan D.Franck文,p.44.同时参见注释[7],pp.1861-1863.See also Philippe Fou-chard,Emmanuel Gaillard&Berthold Goldman,On International Commercial Arbitration,中信出版社2004年影印版,pp.594-596,p.623。
11See Faisal Kutty,The Shari'a Factor in International Commercial Arbitration,Loyola of Los Angeles Inter-national and Comparative Law Review,Summer2006,p.612.
12参见注释[8]中Susan D.Franck文,pp.41～46.See also David J.A.Cairns,Alejandro Lopez Ortiz,Spain’sNew Arbitration Act,International Arbitration Law Review,2004,p.43&p.39。
13Dennis R.Nolan&Roger I.Abrams,Arbitral Immunity,Industrial Relations LawJournal,1989,pp.228-265.
15See Jesmond Parke&David I.Bristow,The Gathering Stormof Arbitrators'and Mediators'Liability,Inter-national Arbitration Law Review,2001,p.135.
16参见注释[7]中文献,pp.1841-1870.See also Jane Ryland&Jane Ryland,A Comparison of the Liability ofArbitrators,Adjudicators,Experts and Advocates,Construction LawJournal,2005,p.14。
1921参见高菲著:《中国海事仲裁的理论与实践》,中国人民大学出版社1998版,第178页。同时参见阎铁毅、梁淑妍:《关于仲裁员责任制度的思考》,《中国海商法》2002年年刊,第290-292页。
20徐前权:《仲裁员法律责任之检讨——兼评“枉法仲裁罪”》(上),《仲裁研究》2006年第3期,第41-42页。
22张晓玲:《国际商事仲裁协议法律适应问题研究》,《政治与法律》2007年第1期,第119页。
23Louis A.Russo,The Consequences of Arbitrating a Legal Malpractice Claim:Rebuilding Faithin the LegalProfession,Hofstra Law Review,Fall2006,p.328.
引用本文
张圣翠. 仲裁民事责任制度探析[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2009, 11(1): 34–41.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：上海证券市场风险管理的法律思考
