" The initial heart and mission of Chinese communists is to seek happiness for the Chinese people and rejuvenation for the Chinese nation.” This is an important content proposed by the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which was successfully held in October 2017, further clarifying the party and the people’s future goals. In this booming era, people’s happiness has become extremely urgent and important, but it has also raised another important issue for us: from what aspects to give people happiness, and how to give people happiness. Focusing on this issue, this paper studies the life trend of residents’ happiness, and the main influencing factors at different stages of life from the perspective of life domains satisfaction. Although the division of main life domains is still in the research stage, according to the existing literature, the generally recognized fields that affect the overall happiness of individuals mainly include health, family, economy and job. According to China’s national conditions and the development direction of Marshall’s demand theory, the influence of social environment on residents’ happiness is increasingly prominent, which becomes an important factor that cannot be ignored. Therefore, the paper not only focuses on the main life domains of health, family, economy and job, but also includes social environmental factors, and studies the impact of five main life domains satisfaction on residents’ happiness. The research on the influence of main life domains satisfaction on subjective well-being (SWB) reflects the high degree of integration between the objective goal that economic research pays attention to and the expected goal that psychology research pays attention to. This paper innovatively studies the marginal effect and the dynamic change of the influence of main life domains satisfaction on SWB, ranks life domains satisfaction according to the marginal effect at different ages, and then provides targeted policy suggestions on how to effectively make people happy. The study finds that the SWB of Chinese residents shows a U-shaped trend, first declining and then rising with age. The marginal effects of the five main life domains satisfaction on SWB vary according to the age difference. These marginal effects, from big to small order (in addition to the family satisfaction) respectively are: economic satisfaction, social environment satisfaction, health satisfaction, and job satisfaction. The marginal effect of family satisfaction is special, and the effect on SWB tends to be inverted U-shaped. Taken together, before middle age (about 46), the improvement of family satisfaction increases SWB most, the second one is economic satisfaction, and job satisfaction has the minimum marginal effect. When young, the improvement in non-monetary factors is more conducive to happiness than that in monetary ones, which is more obvious for urban residents. Therefore, it may be more rational for young urban people to " start a family and start a career”. For rural residents’ happiness, improving economic satisfaction is always the first priority. Promoting happiness, in addition to personal and family efforts, the government can also improve residents’ various life domains satisfaction from various angles. Clarifying the policy supply target according to the urgency of residents’ demand will greatly improve the effectiveness of individual activities and government policies, thus to improve residents’ SWB to the greatest extent. You will feel achievement when you always treat bringing happiness to the people as the original intention.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Dynamic Analysis on the Impact of Main Life Domains Satisfaction on Happiness
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 44, Issue 12, pp. 57 - 69 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.12.005
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Chen G, Li S. How can government make people happy? An empirical study on the impact of government quality on residents’ happiness[J]. Management World, 2012, (8): 55-67. (In Chinese)
[2]Li L, Liang X X. The effect of marriage and children on subjective well-being[J]. Shangdong Social Science, 2017, (2): 100-108. (In Chinese)
[3]Li S, Chen G. The employment effects of happiness: An empirical study on happiness, employment and recessive reemployment[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, (3): 62-74. (In Chinese)
[4]Xu L L, Gong G, Ai C R. Happiness: Spending money or making money?[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016, (6): 17-26. (In Chinese)
[5]Yuan Z, Li L. Marriage and happiness[J]. China Economic Studies, 2017, (1): 24-35. (In Chinese)
[6]Argyle M. The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.)[M]. New York: Routledge, 2001.
[7]Bardo A R. A life course model for a domains-of-life approach to happiness: Evidence from the United States[J]. Advances in Life Course Research, 2017, 33: 11-22. DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2017.06.002
[8]Blanchflower D G, Oswald A J. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, 88(7-8): 1359-1386. DOI:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
[9]Blanchflower D G, Oswald A J. The U-shape without controls: A response to Glenn[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2009, 69(4): 486-488.
[10]Campbell A, Converse P E, Rodgers W L. The quality of American life[M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.
[11]Covan E K. Gender, mental health, and happiness[J]. Health Care for Women International, 2017, 38(2): 73-74. DOI:10.1080/07399332.2017.1288531
[12]Dias J, Schumacher F I, De Almeida D S. Determinantes da felicidade: Dados individuais de Maringá-PR, 2007-2009[J]. Revista Economia & Tecnologia, 2010, 6(1): 89-106.
[13]Diener E, Lucas R E. Personality and subjective well-being[A]. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology[C]. New York: Russell Sage, 1999.
[14]Easterlin R A. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence[A]. David P A, Reder M W. Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
[15]Easterlin R A. Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics, and demography[J]. Jour-nal of Economic Psychology, 2006, 27(4): 463-482. DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2006.05.002
[16]Frey B, Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research?[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 402-435. DOI:10.1257/jel.40.2.402
[17]Krause A. Don’t worry, be happy? Happiness and reemployment[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, 96: 1-20.
[18]Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a new science[M]. London: Penguin Books Limite, 2006.
[19]Ljunge M. Migrants, health, and happiness: Evidence that health assessments travel with migrants and predict well-being[J]. Economics & Human Biology, 2016, 22: 35-46.
[20]Lucas R E, Clark A E, Georgellis Y, et al. Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction[J]. Psychological Science, 2004, 15(1): 8-13. DOI:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501002.x
[21]Nikolova M. Minding the happiness gap: Political institutions and perceived quality of life in transition[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2016, 45(S1): 129-148.
[22]Piper A T. Sliding down the U-shape? A dynamic panel investigation of the age-well-being relationship, focusing on young adults[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 143: 54-61.
[23]Pollak RA. Interdependent preferences[J]. The American Economic Review, 1976, 66(3): 309-320.
[24]VanPraag B M S, Ferrer-I-Carbonell A. Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach[M].Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Cite this article
Xu Lingli, Fang Min, Wang Liang. A Dynamic Analysis on the Impact of Main Life Domains Satisfaction on Happiness[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, 44(12): 57-69.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES