18324 
9693高管团队作为公司中最有影响力的群体，是企业战略决策的制定者和执行者。现有研究大多基于静态的团队构成或结构来论述其对公司战略的影响，对于高管团队的行为过程的理解却较为模糊。本文拓展了高阶梯队理论中的高管团队过程模型，将团队构成、团队结构、团队过程整合为统一的广义高管团队动力模型，并在此框架内对国内外高管团队动力研究进行了文献梳理与评述。本文针对当前高管团队动力研究过于偏重单一维度的静态结构性特征，基于动态过程和整体性视角，深入考察了高管团队动力的过程和机制，以期加深对企业战略决策行为的理解，并探讨了高管团队动力的未来研究机会和方向。
高管团队动力研究述评——基于高阶梯队理论过程模型
摘要
参考文献
7 姜定宇, 郑伯埙. 华人差序式领导的本质与影响历程[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2014,（42）: 285–357.0
23 薛有志, 李国栋. 国际化战略实施与高层管理团队构成实证研究[J]. 管理学报, 2009,（11）: 1478–1485.0 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2009.11.010
33 Amason A C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39（1）: 123–148. DOI:10.2307/256633
34 Barr P S. Current and potential importance of qualitative methods in strategy research[J]. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2004, 1（1）: 165–188
35 Barrick M R, Bradley B H, Kristof-Brown A L, et al. The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（3）: 544–557. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525781
36 Beal D J, Cohen R R, Burke M J,et al. Cohesion and performance in groups: A Meta-analytic clarification of construct relations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88（6）: 989–1004. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
37 Bromiley P, Rau D. Social, Behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: A literature review[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 42（1）: 174–202. DOI:10.1177/0149206315617240
38 Bunderson J S, Sutcliffe K M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45（5）: 875–893. DOI:10.2307/3069319
39 Carmeli A. Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2008, 33（6）: 712–735.
40 Carmeli A, Schaubroeck J. Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17（5）: 441–453. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.06.001
41 Carmeli A, Schaubroeck J, Tishler A. How CEO empowering leadership shapes top management team processes: Implications for firm performance[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22（2）: 399–411. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.013
42 Carpenter M A. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23（3）: 275–284. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
43 Chatman J A, Flynn F J. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44（5）: 956–974. DOI:10.2307/3069440
44 Chua J H, Chrisman J J, De Massis A. A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2015, 39（2）: 173–182. DOI:10.1111/etap.12155
45 Cohen S G, Bailey D E. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23（3）: 239–290. DOI:10.1177/014920639702300303
46 De Wit F R, Greer L L, Jehn K A. The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97（2）: 360–390. DOI:10.1037/a0024844
47 Eisenhardt K M, Bourgeois L J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31（4）: 737–770. DOI:10.2307/256337
48 Eisenhardt K M, Schoonhoven C B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35（3）: 504–529. DOI:10.2307/2393315
49 Ensley M D, Pearson A, Pearce C L. Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2003, 13（2）: 329–346. DOI:10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00020-2
50 Ensley M D, Pearson A W. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, 29（3）: 267–284. DOI:10.1111/etap.2005.29.issue-3
51 Ensley M D, Pearson A W, Amason A C. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002, 17（4）: 365–386. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3
52 Felin T, Foss N J, Ployhart R E. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2015, 9（1）: 575–632. DOI:10.1080/19416520.2015.1007651
53 Finkelstein S, Hambrick D C, Cannella A A. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, USA, 2008.
54 Forsyth D R. Group dynamics[M]. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013.
55 Guillaume Y R, Brodbeck F C, Riketta M. Surface-and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2012, 85（1）: 80–115. DOI:10.1111/joop.2012.85.issue-1
56 Hambrick D C. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the " team” label[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1994a, 16（2）: 171–214.
57 Hambrick D C, Finkelstein S, Mooney A C. Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30（3）: 472–491. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2005.17293355
58 Hambrick D C, Humphrey S E, Gupta A. Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36（3）: 449–461. DOI:10.1002/smj.2230
59 Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9（2）: 193–206.
60 Harrison D A, Klein K J. What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32（4）: 1199–1228. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
61 Hitt M A, Beamish P W, Jackson S E, et al. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（6）: 1385–1399. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.28166219
62 Homberg F, Bui H T. Top management team diversity: A systematic review[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2013, 38（4）: 455–479.
63 Horwitz S K, Horwitz I B. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography[J]. Journal of Management, 2007, 33（6）: 987–1015. DOI:10.1177/0149206307308587
64 Janis I L. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1972.
65 Janis I L, Mann L. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment[M].New York:Free Press, 1977.
66 Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel S C. When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52（3）: 581–598. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331431
67 Klenke K. Qualitative research in the study of leadership[M].Bingley:Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2016.
68 Knockaert M, Ucbasaran D, Wright M, et al. The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science‐based entrepreneurial firms[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35（4）: 777–803. DOI:10.1111/etap.2011.35.issue-4
69 Kwee Z, Van Den Bosch F A, Volberda H W. The influence of top management team’s corporate governance orientation on strategic renewal trajectories: A longitudinal analysis of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, 1907–2004[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48（5）: 984–1014. DOI:10.1111/joms.2011.48.issue-5
70 Li J T, Hambrick D C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48（5）: 794–813. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803923
71 Ling Y, Simsek Z, Lubatkin M H, et al. Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51（3）: 557–576. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32626023
72 Mathieu J, Maynard M T, Rapp T, et al. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34（3）: 410–476. DOI:10.1177/0149206308316061
73 Mathieu J E, Tannenbaum J E, Donsbach J S, et al. A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40（1）: 130–160. DOI:10.1177/0149206313503014
74 Menz M. Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38（1）: 45–80. DOI:10.1177/0149206311421830
75 Michalisin M D, Karau S J, Tangpong C. The effects of performance and team cohesion on attribution: A longitudinal simulation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57（10）: 1108–1115. DOI:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00042-0
76 Mooney A C. The Antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integration[D]. Athens: University of Georgia, 2000.
77 Mullen B, Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 115（2）: 210–227. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
78 Nielsen B B, Nielsen S. Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34（3）: 373–382. DOI:10.1002/smj.2013.34.issue-3
79 Nielsen S. Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12（3）: 301–316.
80 O’reilly C A, Caldwell D F, Barnett W P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34（1）: 21–37. DOI:10.2307/2392984
81 Oh H, Labianca G, Chung M-H. A multilevel model of group social capital[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31（3）: 569–582. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2006.21318918
82 Ou A Y,Tsui A S, Kinicki A J, et al. Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2014, 59（1）: 34–72. DOI:10.1177/0001839213520131
83 Peterson R S, Owens P D, Martorana P V. The group dynamics q-sort in organizational research: A new method for studying familiar problems[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 1999b, 2（2）: 107–139. DOI:10.1177/109442819922001
84 Peterson R S, Owens P D, Tetlock P E, et al. Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 73（2–3）: 272–305. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2763
85 Peterson R S, Smith D B, Martorana P V. Choosing between a rock and a hard place when data are scarce and the questions important: Reply to Hollenbeck, Derue, and Mannor（2006）[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91（1）: 6–8. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.6
86 Peterson R S, Smith D B, Martorana P V,et al. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88（5）: 795–808. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.795
87 Powell W W, Rerup C. Opening the Black Box: The microfoundations of institutions[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, et al.The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[C].2nd ed. [S.l.]: Sage Publishers, 2016.
88 Priem R L, Lyon D W, Dess G G. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research[J]. Journal of Management, 1999, 25（6）: 935–953. DOI:10.1177/014920639902500607
89 Quigley T J, Hambrick D C. Has the " CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in america’s attention to corporate leaders[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36（6）: 821–830. DOI:10.1002/smj.2015.36.issue-6
90 Raes A M, Glunk R U, Heijltjes M G, et al. Top management team and middle managers making sense of leadership[J]. Small Group Research, 2007, 38（3）: 360–386. DOI:10.1177/1046496407301969
91 Raes A M, Heijltjes M G, Glunk U, et al. The interface of the top management team and middle managers: A process model[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36（1）: 102–126.
92 Sanders W G, Carpenter M A. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41（2）: 158–178. DOI:10.2307/257100
93 Shaw M. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
94 Simons T L, Peterson R S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85（1）: 102–111. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
95 Simsek Z, Veiga J F, Lubatkin M H, et al. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48（1）: 69–84. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993139
96 Smith K G, Smith K A, Olian J D, et al. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39（3）: 412–438. DOI:10.2307/2393297
97 Talke K, Salomo S, Kock A. Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2011, 28（6）: 819–832. DOI:10.1111/jpim.2011.28.issue-6
98 Wong E M, Ormiston M E, Tetlock P E. The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54（6）: 1207–1228. DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.0762
99 Zey M. Criticisms of rational choice models[A]. Zey M.Rational Choice Theory and Organizational Theory: A Critique[M].Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, Inc, 1992.
引用本文
汪金爱, 李丹蒙. 高管团队动力研究述评——基于高阶梯队理论过程模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(10): 53–71.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：战略形成、创业学习与新创企业绩效
下一篇：“国家队”持股与上市公司异常停牌
