6033 
7288Through literature review, firstly, it is found that the basic elements of network organization evolution include the evolution of node capabilities, network relationships, and network structure evolution; secondly, strategic situation, high-level orientation, information filtering process of managers, organizational results, and the co-action between organizational consistency and adaptability drive the evolution of network organization; thirdly, this paper sorts out the cognitive model of network organization evolution from the three dimensions of environment, resources and synthesis, including the cognitive model of the environmental perspective and the cognitive model of adaptation, the view of resources from the perspective of convention and the perspective of the prospective outlook, and the integration of perspectives. The limitations of existing literature researches are as follows: Firstly, the existing researches are mainly static perspective analyses, in subsequent studies, the microcosmic factors, endogenous perspective and dynamic perspective of evolution should be emphasized on, and the evolution logic of the value chain, resource chain and behavior chain should be clarified. Secondly, the existing researches mainly focus on the impact of node enterprise managers’ cognition on organizational evolution, and lack of research on sharing cognition among organizations. In future research, the driver role of managers’ sharing cognition and the interaction between information, relationship and structure should be concerned. Thirdly, previous studies are mainly the analyses of the evolution of individual factors, and lack of analyses from the perspective of integration. The issues of collaborative evolutionary between management cognition, network organization and behavior pattern should be focused on. Fourthly, We should pay attention to localization research. In this paper, it carries out detailed analyses of the higher order theory and the theory of situational dualism driving role in the evolution of network organization, summarizes the evolution of network organization cognitive model, and extends the research scope of network organization evolution, which have certain theoretical value. In addition, the relationship between management cognition and the evolution of network organization can help senior managers of enterprises to accurately carry out strategic positioning and effectively select the organizational behavior pattern.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Research on the Driving Factors and Modes of Network Organization Evolution from the Perspective of Managerial Cognition: A Literature Review and Research Agenda
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 06, pp. 99 - 115 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.06.008
Summary
References
Summary
[1] 宝贡敏, 龙思颖. 企业动态能力研究:最新述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015, (7):74-87.
Bao Gongmin, Long Siying. Dynamic capabilities research: The latest review and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2015, 37(7):74-87.
[2] 宝贡敏, 赵卓嘉. 中国文化背景下的"关系"与组织管理[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 14(2):46-52.
Bao Gongmin, Zhao Zhuojia. Guanxi in chinese culture and organization management[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition ), 2008, 14(2):46-52.
[3] 蔡宁, 潘松挺. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化——以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008, (4):137-144.
Cai Ning, Pan Songting. The coupling relationship and synchrony evolving between strength of network tie and mode of innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2008, (4):137-144.
[4] 曹丽莉. 多元应链的构建融合推进产业集群创新升级[J]. 软科学, 2009, 23(1):75-79.
Cao Li-li. Industrial clusters upgrading through the construction of diversified supply chains[J]. Soft Science, 2009, 23(1):75-79.
[5] 陈学光, 徐金发. 网络组织及其惯例的形成——基于演化论的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006, (4):52-58.
Chen Xueguang, Xu Jinfa. Formation of network organization and its routines: based on the views of the evolutionary theory[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2006, (4):52-58.
[6] 邓少军. 高层管理者认知与企业动态能力演化[D]. 复旦大学, 2010: 199.
Deng Shaojun. Senior managers’ cognition and evolution of enterprise’s dynamic capabilities[D]. Fudan University, 2010:199.
[7] 邓少军, 芮明杰. 组织能力演化微观认知机制研究前沿探析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009, (11):38-44.
Deng Shaojun, Rui Mingjie. An analysis of the research frontier of the micro-cognition mechanism of organizational capability evolution[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2009, 31(11):38-44.
[8] 韩敬稳, 彭正银. 基于关系传递的企业网络嵌入的动态过程研究--考虑“互惠性偏好”的序贯博弈分析[J]. 预测, 2015, (5):55-60.
Han Jingwen, Peng Zhengyin. Research on the dynamic process of enterprises’ network embeddedness based on relation transitivity: the sequential game analysis considering reciprocity preference[J]. Forecasting, 2015, (5):55-60.
[9] 赫连志巍,邢建军.产业集群创新网络的自组织演化机制研究[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(04):180-186.
Helian Zhiwei, Xing Jianjun. The self-organizing evolution mechanism of industrial cluster innovation network[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2017, 37(04):180-186.
[10] 胡保亮, 方刚. 网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究——基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (11):18-26.
Hu baoliang, Fang Gang. Network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance: Based on the perspective of global manufacturing network and local cluster network integration[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (11):18-26.
[11] 黄培伦, 尚航标, 王三木, 等. 企业能力:静态能力与动态能力理论界定及关系辨析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, (7):165-169.
Huang Peilun, Shang Hangbiao, Wang Sanmu, etc. Enterprise ability: the theory limits and the relations discrimination between static ability and dynamic ability[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2008, (7):166-169.
[12] 井润田. 中国本土化情境下的组织变革研究[R].天津财经大学, 2016.
Jing Runtian. Research on organizational reform in china's localization context[R]. Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2016.
[13] 李海舰, 田跃新, 李文杰. 互联网思维与传统企业再造[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (10):135-146.
Li Haijian, Tian Yuexin, Li Wenjie. Mobile internet thinking and traditional business reengineering[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2014, (10):135-146.
[14] 李海舰, 魏恒. 新型产业组织分析范式构建研究——从SCP到DIM[J]. 中国工业经济, 2007, (7):29-39.
Li Haijian, Wei Heng. Constructional study on a new research paradigm of industrial organization——from SCP to DIM[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2007, (7):29-39.
[15] 连燕玲, 贺小刚. CEO开放性特征、战略惯性和组织绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015(01):1-19.
Lian Yanling, He Xiaogang. CEO Openness, strategy persistence and organizational performance: A study based on Chinese listed companies[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, (01):1-19
[16] 梁栋. 网络组织的兴起[D]. 中国社会科学院研究生院 中国社会科学院, 2002.
Liang Dong. The rise of network organization[D]. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 2002.
[17] 林润辉, 李维安. 网络组织──更具环境适应能力的新型组织模式[J]. 南开管理评论, 2000, (3):4-7.
Lin Runhui, Li Wei’ an. Network organization: An organization model well adapting to the environment[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2000, (3):4-7.
[18] 刘仁军. 关系契约与企业网络转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006, (6):91-98.
Liu Renjun. Relational contract and business networks’ transition[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2006, (6):91-98
[19] 刘学元, 丁雯婧, 赵先德. 企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(1):30-42.
Liu Xueyuan, Ding Wenjing, Zhao Xiande. Firm’s strength of ties within innovation network, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in the Chinese manufacturing industries[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016, 19(1):30-42.
[20] 罗珉. 价值星系:理论解释与价值创造机制的构建[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006, (1):80-89.
Luo Min. Value Constellation: Theoretical explanation and construction of value-creating mechanism[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2006, (1):80-89.
[21] 罗珉. 战略选择论的起源、发展与复杂性范式[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2006 , (1):9-16.
Luo Min. The origin, development and complexity paradigm of strategic choice theory[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2006, (1):9-16.
[22] 罗珉, 高强. 中国网络组织:网络封闭和结构洞的悖论[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011, (11):90-99.
Luo Min, Gao Qiang. Chinese networked organization: The paradox between network closure and structural hole[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2011, (11):90-99.
[23] 罗珉, 李亮宇. 互联网时代的商业模式创新:价值创造视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015, (1):95-107.
Luo Min, Li Liangyu. The innovation of business model in internet era: From value creation perspective[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015, (1):95-107.
[24] 吕鸿江, 程明, 刘洪. 中国情境下的战略复杂性驱动因素研究:管理者认知视角的分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2013, (2):54-64.
Lv hongjiang, Cheng Ming, Liu Hong. An empirical study on the driving factors of strategic complexity in transitional period: The analysis from managers' cognitive perspective[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2013, (2):54-64.
[25] 吕鸿江,吴亮,张鑫.CAS视角下企业正式及非正式网络互动适应环境的理论框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(03):31-42.
Lv Hongjiang, Wu Liang, Zhang Xin. A theoretical framework of the interplay between formal and informal network impact on organizational adaptation: the role of ambidexterity innovation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2006, 37(03):31-42.
[26] 吕洁, 张钢. 团队认知的涌现:基于集体信息加工的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(12):2214-2223.
Lv Jie, Zhang Gang. The emergence of team cognition: Based on the perspective of collective information processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12):2214-2223.
[27] 吕洁, 张钢. 知识异质性对知识型团队创造力的影响机制:基于互动认知的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4):533-544.
Lv Jie, Zhang Gang. The mechanisms of knowledge heterogeneity on creativity of knowledge teams: An interactive cognition perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4):533-544.
[28] 马骏, 席酉民, 曾宪聚. 战略的选择:管理认知与经验搜索[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(11):114-119.
Ma Jun, XI Youmin, ZENG Xianju. Strategy choice: Management cognition and experiential search[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2007, 28(11):114-119.
[29] 买忆媛, 叶竹馨, 陈淑华. 从“兵来将挡,水来土掩”到组织惯例形成——转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (8):147-165.
Mai Yiyuan, Ye Zhuxin, Chen Shuhua. From “bīng lái jiàng dǎng，shuǐ lái tǔ yǎn” to the formation of organizational conventions: The research on improvisation strategy of new enterprises in transition Economy[J]. Management World, 2015, (8):147-165.
[30] 潘松挺, 蔡宁. 企业创新网络中关系强度的测量研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2010, (5):108-115.
Pan Songting, Cai Ning. Dimension exploitation and measurement of tie strength in enterprise network[J]. China Soft Science, 2010, (5):108-115.
[31] 彭正银. 人力资本治理模式的选择——基于任务复杂性的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2003, (8):76-83.
Peng Zhengyin. Task Complexity and choice on governance mode of human capital[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2003, (8):76-83.
[32] 彭正银. 网络治理理论探析[J]. 中国软科学, 2002, (3):50-54.
Peng Zhengyin. Research on the theory of network governance[J]. China Soft Science, 2002, (3):50-54.
[33] 彭正银, 黄晓芬. 网络组织认知模式与战略的博弈选择——基于信息要素的视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2017, (11):5-14.
Peng Zhengyin, Huang Xiaofen. Cognitive models and game strategies choice of network organization: A Perspective of Information as a Factor[J]. East China Economic Management, 2017, (11):5-14.
[34] 钱锡红, 杨永福, 徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2010, (5):118-129.
Qian Xihong, Yang Yongfu, Xu Wanli. Firm network positon, absorptive capacity and innovative performance: An interaction model[J]. Management World, 2010, (5):118-129.
[35] 尚航标. 动态环境下战略决策者管理认知对战略反应速度与动态能力的影响研究[D]. 华南理工大学, 2010.
Shang Hangbiao. Research on the effects of managerial cognition on speed of strategic response and dynamic capabilities in hyper competition[D]. South China University of Technology, 2010.
[36] 孙国强. 关系、互动与协同:网络组织的治理逻辑[J]. 中国工业经济, 2003, (11):14-20.
Sun Guoqiang. Relationship, Interaction and synergy: the governance logic of network organization[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2003, (11):14-20.
[37] 孙国强. 网络组织的形成动因、条件与方式[J]. 商业研究, 2001, (10):74-75.
Sun Guoqiang. The Causes, conditions and ways of the formation of network organizations[J]. Commercial Research, 2001, (10):74-75.
[38] 孙晋众, 陈世权. 网络组织拓扑聚类分析[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2007, (1):32-34.
Sun Jinzhong, Chen Shiquan. Topology cluster analysis of network organization relationships[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2007. (1):32-34.
[39] 汤长安, 张亮. 认知距离与知识转移绩效的关系研究[J].求索,2012(11):233-235.
Tang Chang’an, Zhang Liang. Research on the relationship between cognitive distance and knowledge transfer performance[J]. Seeker, 2012, (11):233-235.
[40] 王福胜, 王摄琰. CEO网络嵌入性与企业价值[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012, (1):75-83.
Wang Fusheng, Wang Sheyan. CEO network embeddedness and enterprises value[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2012, 15(1):75-83.
[41] 王海花,谢富纪.企业外部知识网络能力的结构测量——基于结构洞理论的研究[J].中国工业经济,2012(07):134-146.
Wang Haihua, Xie Fuji. Research on the structure and measurement of corporate external knowledge network capability: Based on the structural holes theory[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2012, (07):134-146..
[42] 王军, 曹光明, 江若尘. 组织即兴的形成机制研究:基于社会网络和组织学习理论[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, (2):33-48.
Wang Jun, Cao Guangming, Jiang Ruochen. On formation mechanism of organizational improvisation: Bases on social network and organization learning theories[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2016, (2):33-48.
[43] 王向民. 网络社会的信息传播与决策机制[J]. 社会科学, 2012, (12):35-43.
Wang Xiangmin. Information dissemination and the decision-making mechanisms of the network society[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2012, (12):35-43.
[44] 王颜芳. 管理角色动机、晋升机会认知与管理者的创新行为[J]. 经济经纬, 2009, (6):82-85.
Wang Yanfang. Managerial role motivation, promotion opportunity cognition and managers innovative behavior[J]. Economic Survey, 2009, (6):82-85.
[45] 吴先华, 郭际, 胡汉辉. 技术联盟企业的认知距离、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008(03):53-58.
WU Xianhua, GUO Ji, HU Hanhui. Study on the relationship between cognition distance, absorptive capacity and innovation performance in technology- based alliance[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2008, (03):53-58.
[46] 武亚军. “战略框架式思考”、“悖论整合”与企业竞争优势——任正非的认知模式分析及管理启示[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (4):150-163.
Wu Yajun. “Strategic thinking of frame”, “integration of public opinion” and Corporate competitive advantage: Ren Zhengfei’s cognitive model analysis and management inspiration[J]. Management World, 2013, (4):150-163.
[47] 肖冬平, 顾新. 基于自组织理论的知识网络结构演化研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, (19):168-172.
Xiao Dongping, Gu Xin. Research on the evolution of knowledge network from the perspective of the self-organization theory[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2009, (19):168-172.
[48] 杨桂菊. 基于社会资本理论的网络组织演化机制新阐释[J]. 软科学, 2007, (4):5-8.
Yang Guiju. The evolutionary mechanism of network organization based on social capital theory[J]. Soft Science, 2007, (4):5-8.
[49] 杨林. 创业型企业高管团队垂直对差异与创业战略导向:产业环境和企业所有制的调节效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, (1):134-144.
Yang Lin. Empirical study on the relationship between the vertical dyad differences of top management team and entrepreneurial strategic orientation: the moderating effects of industry environment and corporate ownership[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2014, (1):134-144.
[50] 杨林, 俞安平. 企业家认知对企业战略变革前瞻性的影响:知识创造过程的中介效应[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, (1):120-133.
Yang Lin, Yu Anping. Empirical study on the relationship between entrepreneurial cognitions and enterprise strategic change prospectivity: The Mediating Effect of Knowledge Creation Process[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016, (1):120-133.
[51] 姚振华, 孙海法. 高管团队组成特征与行为整合关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, (1):15-22.
Yao Zhenhua, Sun Haifa. The research of compositional traits and behavioral integration of top management team [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2010, (1):15-22.
[52] 叶红心, 薛耀文, 盛昭瀚. 基于成员特征及历史信息的合作意愿度迭代模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, (02):103-108.
Ye Hongxin, Xue Yaowen, Sheng Zhaohan. An iterated model on the degree of willingness to cooperate based on member characteristic and history information[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2004, (02):103-108.
[53] 于永海, 吕福新. 企业网络的演化趋势[J]. 管理世界, 2014, (1):180-181.
Yu Yonghai, Lv Fuxin. The evolution of corporate networks[J]. Management World, 2014, (1):180-181.
[54] 余明桂, 夏新平, 邹振松. 管理者过度自信与企业激进负债行为[J]. 管理世界, 2006, (8):104-112.
Yu Minggui, Xia Xinping, Zou Zhensong. Managerial overconfidence and aggressive liabilities[J]. Management World, 2006, (1):104-112.
[55] 韵江, 王文敬. 组织记忆、即兴能力与战略变革[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, (4):36-46.
Yun Jiang, Wang Wenjing. Organizational memory, improvisational capability and strategic change[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2015, (4):36-46.
[56] 张靓, 何龙飞. SACI-4S~2:企业间网络组织演化模型——核心企业组织的产品合作创新驱动力视角[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, (4):52-57.
Zhang Liang, He Longfei. SACI-4S~2: Enterprises network evolution model--driven by product cooperative innovation organized by core enterprises[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2011, (4):52-57.
[57] 张琳, 施建军. 网络组织演化中的企业创新合作博弈分析[J]. 南京社会科学, 2011, (2):30-34.
Zhang Lin, Shi Jianjun. The game analysis of enterprise innovation cooperation during network organization evolution[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2011, (2):30-34.
[58] 张朋柱, 薛耀文. 博弈者认知模式与合作意愿度分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2005, (5):5-13.
Zhang Pengzhu,Xue Yaowen. Analysis on relationship between player perception style and willingness to cooperate[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2005, (5):5-13.
[59] 张铁男, 韩兵. 企业战略的动态适应性范式以及研究方法——基于演化的视角[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2011, (3):28-33.
Zhang Tienan,Han Bing. The dynamic paradigm and research method of adaptive enterprise strategy—Based on the Evolution Theory[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2011, (3):28-33.
[60] 张映红. 动态环境对公司创业战略与绩效关系的调节效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(1):105-113.
Zhang Yinghong. An empirical study on moderating role of environment dynamism on relationship of entrepreneurial strategy and performance[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2008, (1):105-113.
[61] 张文慧, 王辉. 长期结果考量、自我牺牲精神与领导授权赋能行为:环境不确定性的调节作用[J]. 管理世界, 2009(6):115-123.
Zhang Wenhui，Wang Hui. Long-term results considerations, self-sacrifice, and empowered empowerment: The regulatory role of environmental uncertainty[J]. Management World, 2009, (6):115-123.
[62] 郑方, 彭正银. 基于关系传递的结构嵌入演化与技术创新优势——一个探索性案例研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, (1):120-133.
Zheng Fang, Peng Zhengyin. Structural embeddedness evolvement and technology innovation advantage based on relationship transfer perspective: Exploratory study of typical case[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2017, (1):120-133.
[63] 周冬梅. 创业资源获取与创业网络关系动态演化研究[D]. 电子科技大学, 2011.
Zhou Dongmei. Research on entrepreneurial resource acquisition and dynamic evolution of entrepreneurial network relations[D]. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2011.
[64] Adner R, Helfat C E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10):1011-1025.
[65] Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(3):425-455.
[66] Aken J E V, Weggeman M P. Managing learning in informal innovation networks: overcoming the Daphne-dilemma[J]. R & D Management, 2010, 30(2):139-150.
[67] Amason A C, Shrader R C, Tompson G H. Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(1):125-148.
[68] Amit R, Schoemaker P J H. Strategic assets and organizational rent[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(1):33-46.
[69] Anderson P W, Tushman M L. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31(3):439.
[70] Argote L, Beckman S L, Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings[J]. Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital, 1998, 36(2):189-209.
[71] Augier M, Teece D J. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: penrosean insights and omissions[J]. Management International Review, 2007, 47(2):175-192.
[72] Barr P S, Stimpert J L, Huff A S. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(S1):15-36.
[73] Barringer B R, Jones F F, Neubaum D O. A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(5):663-687.
[74] Bianconi G, Barabási A L. Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks[J]. Physics, 2001, 30(1):37-43.
[75] Birley S. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1985, 1(1):107-17.
[76] Bogner W C, Barr P S. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition[J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11(2):212-226.
[77] Bresman H. External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(1): 81-96.
[78] Burt R S. Structural Holes: The social structure of competition[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 42(Volume 99, Number 4):7060-7066.
[79] Camuffo A. Transforming industrial districts: large firms and small business networks in the Italian eyewear industry[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2010, 10(4):377-401.
[80] Cohen M D, Burkhart R, Dosi G et al. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues[J]. Journal of Immunological Methods, 1995, 418(3):9-18.
[81] Coleman J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(1):17-41.
[82] Cooke N J, Gorman J C, Myers C W, et al. Interactive team cognition[R]. Arizona University and Cognitive Engineering Research Institute, 2009-12-9.
[83] Daft R L, Weick K E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2):284-295.
[84] Datta D K, Rajagopalan N, Zhang A Y. New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: the Moderating role of industry characteristics[J]. British Journal of Management, 2003, 14(2):101-114.
[85] Delgado-García J B, Fuente-Sabaté J M D L. How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(5):562-574.
[86] Duncan R B. The Ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation[J]. Management of Organization Design, 1976:167-188.
[87] Dyer J H, Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):345-367.
[88] Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10‐11):1105-1121.
[89] Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(6):599-617.
[90] Gavetti G, Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(1):113-137.
[91] Gavetti G, Levinthal D A, Rivkin J W. Response to farjoun's 'strategy making, novelty, and analogical reasoning: commentary on Gavetti, Levinthal, and Rivkin (2005)'[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(9):1017-1021.
[92] Gavetti G, Levinthal D A, Rivkin J W. Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(8):691-712.
[93] Gavetti G, Rivkin J W. On the origin of strategy: action and cognition over time[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(3):420-439.
[94] Gibson C B. From Knowledge Accumulation to Accommodation: Cycles of Collective Cognition in Work Groups[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22(2):121–134.
[95] Giuliani E, Bell M. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(1):47-68.
[96] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3):481-510.
[97] Granovetter M. Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis[J]. Acta Sociologica, 1992, 35(1):3-11.
[98] Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
[99] Grant R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2):109-122.
[100] Gulati R. Network location and learning: The Influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5):397-420.
[101] Gulati, Ranjay, Gargiulo et al. Where do interorganizational networks come from?[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 104(5):1438-1439.
[102] Håkansson H, Snehota I. Developing relationships in business networks[M]. Routledge, 1995: 42-46.
[103] Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2):193-206.
[104] Hambrick D C. Upper echelons theory: an update[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2):334-343.
[105] Hansen M T. Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3):232-248.
[106] Heavey C, Simsek Z. Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Influence of Transactive Memory Systems[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 3(43):919-945.
[107] Helfat C E, Peteraf M A. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(6):831-850.
[108] Hite J M, Hesterly W S. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(3):275-286.
[109] Hmieleski K M, Corbett A C. The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008, 23(4): 482-496.
[110] Jackson M O, Watts A. The Evolution of Social and Economic Networks[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1998, 106(2):265-295.
[111] Johanson J, Mattsson L. Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the Ttransaction-cost approach[J]. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1987, 17(1):34-48.
[112] Klepper S. Firm Survival and the evolution of oligopoly[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2002, 33(1):37-61.
[113] Klepper S, Simons K L. Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21:997-1016.
[114] Knight D, Pearce C L, Smith K G et al. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5):445-465.
[115] Knippenberg D V, Dahlander L, Haas M et al. Information, attention, and decision making[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(3):649-657.
[116] Krueger J N, Carsrud A L. Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1993, 5(4): 315-330.
[117] Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37(1):76-104.
[118] Larsson R. The Handshake between invisible and visible hands: toward a tripolar institutional framework[J]. International Studies of Management & Organization, 1993, 23(1):87-106.
[119] Levine J M，Smith E R. Group Cognition: Collective Information Search and Distribution[M]. New York：Oxford University Press，2013:616-634.
[120] Mcdonough E F, Leifer R. Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26(4):727-735.
[121] Mcgrath R G. The end of competitive advantage: how to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business[J]. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013, 56(5):64-65.
[122] Mitchell R K, Smith B, Seawright K W, et al. Cross-Cultural Cognitions and the Venture Creation Decision[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(5):974-993.
[123] Nelson R R, Winter S G. Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16(2):23-46.
[124] Normann R, Ramirez R. From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71(4):65-77.
[125] Peng M W, Luo Y. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(3):486-501.
[126] Powell W W. Interorganizational collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1):116-145.
[127] Powell W W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990(12):295-336.
[128] Prahalad C K, Bettis R A. The dominant logic a new linkage between diversity and performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986, 7(6):485-501.
[129] Prahalad C K, Hamel G. The Core competence of the corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, 68(3):275-292.
[130] Reagans R, Mcevily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2):240-267.
[131] Rodan S, Galunic D C. More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(6):541-562.
[132] Schreyogg G, Kliescheberl M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(9):913-933.
[133] Shaw J D, Duffy M K, Johnson J L et al. Turnover, social capital losses, and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(4):594-606.
[134] Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1):273-292.
[135] Smith K G, Smith K A, Olian J D et al. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39(3):412-438.
[136] Snow C C, Miles R E, Jr H J C. Managing 21st century network organizations[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1992, 20(3):5-20.
[137] Stuart R W, Abetti P A. Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 5(3):151-162.
[138] Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13):1319-1350.
[139] Teece D J, Pisano G P, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7):509-533.
[140] Thorelli H B. Networks: between markets and hierarchies[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986, 7(1):37-51.
[141] Thune T. University-industry collaboration: The network embeddedness approach[J]. Science & Public Policy, 2007, 34(3):158-168.
[142] Tomlinson P R. Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(6):762-775.
[143] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5):996-1004.
[144] Tushman M L, Oreilly C A. The Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review, 1996, 38(4):8-30.
[145] Umberson D, Chen M D, House J S et al. The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: are man and women so different? [J]. American Sociological Review, 1996, 61(5):837-857.
[146] Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing[J]. American Sociological Review, 1999, 64(4):481-505.
[147] Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1):35-67.
[148] Vlachopoulou M, Manthou V. Partnership alliances in virtual markets[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2003, 33(3):254-267.
[149] Wernerfelt B, Karnani A. Competitive strategy under uncertainty[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 8(2):187-194.
[150] Wiersema M F, Bantel K A. Top Management team demography and corporate strategic change[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(1):91-121.
[151] Williamson O E. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991, 36(2): 269-296.
[152] Williamson O E. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1975, 86(343):619.
[153] Winter S G. Understanding dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10):991-995.
Cite this article
Huang Xiaofen, Peng Zhengyin. Research on the Driving Factors and Modes of Network Organization Evolution from the Perspective of Managerial Cognition: A Literature Review and Research Agenda[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(6): 99-115.
Export Citations as:
For
