团队创新研究进展述评与重构:二元性视角
外国经济与管理 2015 年 第 37 卷第 06 期, 页码:
摘要
参考文献
摘要
本文从二元性视角切入,对团队创新相关研究的进展进行了系统的梳理和述评。文章首先阐述了团队层面二元性的概念,强调了情境二元性对于团队创新的重要性,并指出了现有的团队创新研究在这方面的局限;然后在二元性视角下回顾了近十年来的团队创新研究,并对现有研究结果进行了重新解读;最后在前人研究的基础上,结合二元性的理论内涵,对未来的团队创新研究进行了展望。
[1]Amabile T M. Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do[J]. California Management Review, 1997, 40(1): 39-58.
[2]Ancona D G and Caldwell D F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992a, 37(4): 634-665.
[3]Ancona D G and Caldwell D F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance[J]. Organization Science, 1992b, 3(3): 321-341.
[4]Anderson N, Potoc∨nik K and Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A Stateofthescience review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1297-1333.
[5]Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M and Farr J. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2(3): 305-337.
[6]Chen M H. Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2006, 15(1): 105-116.
[7]Chen G,Farh J L,CampbellBush E M, Wu Z and Wu X. Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(6): 1018-1027.
[8]De Dreu C K. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(1): 83-107.
[9]DrachZahavy A, Somech A, Granot M and Spitzer A. Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovationimplementations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 217-234.
[10]Eisenbeiss S A, Van Knippenberg D and Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(6): 1438-1446.
[11]Ellis A P, Mai K M and Christian J S. Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups:A categorizationelaboration approach[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(6): 948-961.
[12]Farh J L, Lee C and Farh C I. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6): 1173-1180.
[13]Ford C and Sullivan D M. A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 279-292.
[14]Gebert D, Boerner S and Kearney E. Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(3): 593-608.
[15]Gibson C B and Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 209-226.
[16]Harvey S. A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49(5): 822-832.
[17]He Z L and Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
[18]Hoegl M and Parboteeah K P. Team reflexivity in innovative projects[J]. R&D Management, 2006, 36(2): 113-125.
[19]Hülsheger U R, Anderson N and Salgado J F. Teamlevel predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive metaanalysis spanning three decades of research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1128-1145.
[20]Keller R T. Crossfunctional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(3): 547-555.
[21]Keller R T. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 202-210.
[22]Liu Y and Phillips J S. Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2011, 31(1): 44-52.
[23]Liu L and Leitner D. Simultaneous pursuit of innovation and efficiency in complex engineering projects—A study of the antecedents and impacts of ambidexterity in project teams[J]. Project Management Journal, 2012, 43(6): 97-110.
[24]March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
[25]MironSpector E, Erez M and Naveh E.Team composition and innovation:The importance of conformists and attentivetodetail members[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(4): 740-760.
[26]Raisch S and Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(3): 375-409.
[27]Rietzschel E F. Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation[J]. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2011, 14(3): 337-345.
[28]Rosing K, Frese M and Bausch A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadershipinnovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5): 956-974.
[29]Schippers M C, West M A and Dawson J F. Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 41(3): 769-788.
[30]Schulze A and Hoegl M. Knowledge creation in new product development projects[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(2): 210-236.
[31]Somech A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(1): 132-157.
[32]Somech A and DrachZahavy A. Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(3): 684-708.
[33]Somech A and Khalaili A. Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2014, 39(3): 274-299.
[34]Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.
[35]Vera D and Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(3): 203-224.
[36]West M A. The social psychology of innovation in groups[A]. in West M A and Farr J L (Eds.). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies[C]. Chichester: Wiley, 1990: 101-122.
[37]West M A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups[J]. Applied Psychology, 2002, 51(3): 355-387.
[38]Wong S S. Distal and local group learning: Performance tradeoffs and tensions[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6): 645-656.
[39]Xie X Y, Wang W L and Luan K. It is not what we have, but how we use it: Reexploring the relationship between task conflict and team innovation from the resourcebased view[J]. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2014, 17(2): 240-251.
[40]Zhang A Y, Tsui A S and Wang D X. Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5): 851-862.
[2]Ancona D G and Caldwell D F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992a, 37(4): 634-665.
[3]Ancona D G and Caldwell D F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance[J]. Organization Science, 1992b, 3(3): 321-341.
[4]Anderson N, Potoc∨nik K and Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A Stateofthescience review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5): 1297-1333.
[5]Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M and Farr J. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2(3): 305-337.
[6]Chen M H. Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2006, 15(1): 105-116.
[7]Chen G,Farh J L,CampbellBush E M, Wu Z and Wu X. Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(6): 1018-1027.
[8]De Dreu C K. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(1): 83-107.
[9]DrachZahavy A, Somech A, Granot M and Spitzer A. Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovationimplementations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 217-234.
[10]Eisenbeiss S A, Van Knippenberg D and Boerner S. Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(6): 1438-1446.
[11]Ellis A P, Mai K M and Christian J S. Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups:A categorizationelaboration approach[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(6): 948-961.
[12]Farh J L, Lee C and Farh C I. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6): 1173-1180.
[13]Ford C and Sullivan D M. A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 279-292.
[14]Gebert D, Boerner S and Kearney E. Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies?[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(3): 593-608.
[15]Gibson C B and Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 209-226.
[16]Harvey S. A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49(5): 822-832.
[17]He Z L and Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
[18]Hoegl M and Parboteeah K P. Team reflexivity in innovative projects[J]. R&D Management, 2006, 36(2): 113-125.
[19]Hülsheger U R, Anderson N and Salgado J F. Teamlevel predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive metaanalysis spanning three decades of research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1128-1145.
[20]Keller R T. Crossfunctional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(3): 547-555.
[21]Keller R T. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 202-210.
[22]Liu Y and Phillips J S. Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2011, 31(1): 44-52.
[23]Liu L and Leitner D. Simultaneous pursuit of innovation and efficiency in complex engineering projects—A study of the antecedents and impacts of ambidexterity in project teams[J]. Project Management Journal, 2012, 43(6): 97-110.
[24]March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
[25]MironSpector E, Erez M and Naveh E.Team composition and innovation:The importance of conformists and attentivetodetail members[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(4): 740-760.
[26]Raisch S and Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(3): 375-409.
[27]Rietzschel E F. Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation[J]. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2011, 14(3): 337-345.
[28]Rosing K, Frese M and Bausch A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadershipinnovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5): 956-974.
[29]Schippers M C, West M A and Dawson J F. Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 41(3): 769-788.
[30]Schulze A and Hoegl M. Knowledge creation in new product development projects[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(2): 210-236.
[31]Somech A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(1): 132-157.
[32]Somech A and DrachZahavy A. Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(3): 684-708.
[33]Somech A and Khalaili A. Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2014, 39(3): 274-299.
[34]Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.
[35]Vera D and Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(3): 203-224.
[36]West M A. The social psychology of innovation in groups[A]. in West M A and Farr J L (Eds.). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies[C]. Chichester: Wiley, 1990: 101-122.
[37]West M A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups[J]. Applied Psychology, 2002, 51(3): 355-387.
[38]Wong S S. Distal and local group learning: Performance tradeoffs and tensions[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6): 645-656.
[39]Xie X Y, Wang W L and Luan K. It is not what we have, but how we use it: Reexploring the relationship between task conflict and team innovation from the resourcebased view[J]. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2014, 17(2): 240-251.
[40]Zhang A Y, Tsui A S and Wang D X. Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5): 851-862.
引用本文
王唯梁, 谢小云. 团队创新研究进展述评与重构:二元性视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015, 37(6): 0.
导出参考文献,格式为: