试论经营结构理论的起源与模块化困境的突破
5196 
410
外国经济与管理 2007 年 第 29 卷第 04 期, 页码：33 - 37
摘要
参考文献
摘要
模块化理论已成为组织管理和产业组织理论的前沿,但模块化本身却无法突破网络锁定和系统创新的瓶颈。以产品结构为核心内容的经营结构理论,从企业内创和上下游相关企业共创的视角,对此进行了全新的阐释和探索。本文通过对模块化创新困境的剖析,阐述了经营结构理论的起源及其主要思想,并在对模块化理论和经营结构理论进行比较以后,指出了经营结构理论应继续关注的领域。
[1]青木昌彦.产业结构的模块化理论[A].青木昌彦,安藤晴彦编著.模块时代:新产业结构的本质[C].上海:上海远东出版社,2003:3-31.
[2]武石彰,藤本隆宏,具承桓.自動車産業におけるモジュ?ル化:製品?生産?調達システムの複合ヒエラルキ?[A].藤本隆宏,武石彰,青島矢一.ビジネス?ア-キテクチャ製品?組織?プロセスの略的設計[C].東京:有斐閣,2001:第四章.
[3]Raghu Garud,and Arun Kumaraswamy.Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution[J].StrategicManagement Journal,1995,16(5):93-109.
[4]Clayton M Christensen.Innovator’s dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail(Hardcover)[M].Boston:HarvardBusiness School Press,1997.
[5]Rebecca M Henderson,and Kim B Clark.Architectural innovation:The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the fail-ure of established firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):9-30.
[6]Karl T Ulrich.The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm[J].Research Policy,1995,24(3):419-440.
[7]藤本隆宏,武石彰,青島矢一.ビジネス?ア-キテクチャ製品?組織?プロセスの略的設計[C].東京:有斐閣,2001.
[8]Clayton M Christensen.Linking strategy and innovation:Materials technology corp[J].Harvard Business School Cases,1996,(1):1-17.
[9]Michael T Hannan,and John Freeman.Structural inertia and organizational change[J].American Sociological Review,1984,49(2):149-164.
[10]Clayton M Christensen,Fernando F Suarez,and James M Utterback.Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries[J].Manage-ment Science,1998,44(12):207-220.
[11]David J Teece,Gary Pisano,and Amy Shuen.Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,118(7):509-533.
[12]Ikujiro Nonaka,and Hirotaka Takeuchi.The knowledge creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innova-tion[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1995.
[13]刘仁杰.让竞争者学不像:透视台湾标竿产业经营结构[M].台湾:远流出版社,2005.
[14]徐宏玲.模块化组织价值创新:原理、机制及理论挑战[J].中国工业经济,2006,(3):83-91.
[2]武石彰,藤本隆宏,具承桓.自動車産業におけるモジュ?ル化:製品?生産?調達システムの複合ヒエラルキ?[A].藤本隆宏,武石彰,青島矢一.ビジネス?ア-キテクチャ製品?組織?プロセスの略的設計[C].東京:有斐閣,2001:第四章.
[3]Raghu Garud,and Arun Kumaraswamy.Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution[J].StrategicManagement Journal,1995,16(5):93-109.
[4]Clayton M Christensen.Innovator’s dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail(Hardcover)[M].Boston:HarvardBusiness School Press,1997.
[5]Rebecca M Henderson,and Kim B Clark.Architectural innovation:The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the fail-ure of established firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):9-30.
[6]Karl T Ulrich.The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm[J].Research Policy,1995,24(3):419-440.
[7]藤本隆宏,武石彰,青島矢一.ビジネス?ア-キテクチャ製品?組織?プロセスの略的設計[C].東京:有斐閣,2001.
[8]Clayton M Christensen.Linking strategy and innovation:Materials technology corp[J].Harvard Business School Cases,1996,(1):1-17.
[9]Michael T Hannan,and John Freeman.Structural inertia and organizational change[J].American Sociological Review,1984,49(2):149-164.
[10]Clayton M Christensen,Fernando F Suarez,and James M Utterback.Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries[J].Manage-ment Science,1998,44(12):207-220.
[11]David J Teece,Gary Pisano,and Amy Shuen.Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,118(7):509-533.
[12]Ikujiro Nonaka,and Hirotaka Takeuchi.The knowledge creating company:How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innova-tion[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1995.
[13]刘仁杰.让竞争者学不像:透视台湾标竿产业经营结构[M].台湾:远流出版社,2005.
[14]徐宏玲.模块化组织价值创新:原理、机制及理论挑战[J].中国工业经济,2006,(3):83-91.
引用本文
徐宏玲, 李双海. 试论经营结构理论的起源与模块化困境的突破[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2007, 29(4): 33–37.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：策略性绩效管理研究评述
下一篇：试论象征消费与品牌象征化
