4075 
4507Drawing on the theory of emotional cognitive evaluation and the theory of goal interdependence, this study explores the mechanism of workplace ostracism on bystander behavior by building a moderated mediating effect model, and examines the mediating effect of bystander emotions and the moderating effect of goal interdependence. The results show that: under the condition of high cooperation goal interdependence and high competition goal interdependence, workplace ostracism has a significant indirect impact on bystander behavior. The stronger the mutual dependence of the cooperative goal between the bystander and the victim, the stronger the positive influence of workplace ostracism on the bystander’s sympathy; the stronger the mutual dependence of the competitive goal between the bystander and the victim, the stronger the positive influence of workplace ostracism on the bystander’s schadenfreude. The different emotions of bystanders will stimulate their different behavioral responses. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Most of the existing researches on workplace ostracism explore the influence mechanism of workplace ostracism from the perspective of victims, but ignore the role and behavior of bystanders as third-party forces in workplace ostracism. This study provides a new perspective for the theoretical study of workplace ostracism from the perspective of bystanders. (2) Based on the theory of goal interdependence, this study responds to the call to pay attention to the bystander’s schadenfreude. (3) This study shows that disruptive behavior is expensive for organizations. Therefore, it is very important to understand how workplace ostracism induces the negative behavior of bystanders, which is helpful for managers to reduce the harm of workplace ostracism. Our results also highlight the importance of organizational inhibition of workplace ostracism, as they show that workplace ostracism affects a wider range of working groups, especially bystanders. Previous studies on workplace ostracism have shown that ostracism can bring high costs to organizations through its impact on victims and their behavior. By examining the reaction of bystanders in workplace ostracism events, this study shows that workplace ostracism costs even more to the organization, because bystanders can sustain destructive behavior in the organization by witnessing workplace ostracism. However, a positive conclusion is that some bystanders have made constructive responses through the support of their colleagues. These types of reactions can obviously help organizational managers to detect workplace ostracism. In addition, they can help to build a compassionate and supportive workplace environment.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Workplace Ostracism and Bystander Behavior: The Role of Emotions and Goal Interdependence
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 06, pp. 86 - 98 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200317.401
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Baumeister R F, Vohs K D, Nathan Dewall C, et al. How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2007, 11(2): 167-203.
[2] Dhanani L Y, LaPalme M L. It’s not personal: A review and theoretical integration of research on vicarious workplace mistreatment[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(6): 2322-2351.
[3] Elfenbein H A. The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage[J]. Organizational Psychology Review, 2014, 4(4): 326-362.
[4] Ferris D L, Brown D J, Berry J W, et al. The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(6): 1348-1366.
[5] Ferris D L, Chen M, Lim S. Comparing and contrasting workplace ostracism and incivility[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2017, 4: 315-338.
[6] Ferris D L, Yan M, Lim V K G, et al. An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(5): 1777-1800.
[7] Hershcovis M S, Bhatnagar N. When fellow customers behave badly: Witness reactions to employee mistreatment by customers[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 102(11): 1528-1544.
[8] Kwan H K, Zhang X M, Liu J, et al. Workplace ostracism and employee creativity: An integrative approach incorporating pragmatic and engagement roles[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2018, 103(12): 1358-1366.
[9] Li X X, McAllister D J, Ilies R, et al. Schadenfreude: A counternormative observer response to workplace mistreatment[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2019, 44(2): 360-376.
[10] Miner-Rubino K, Cortina L M. Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 1254-1269.
[11] Mitchell M S, Vogel R M, Folger R. Third parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(4): 1040-1055.
[12] Mroz J E, Allen J A. An experimental investigation of the interpersonal ramifications of lateness to workplace meetings[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2017, 90(4): 508-534.
[13] Priesemuth M. Stand up and speak up: Employees' prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision[J]. Business & Society, 2013, 52(4): 649-665.
[14] Priesemuth M, Schminke M. Helping thy neighbor? Prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision in the workplace[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(3): 1225-1251.
[15] Robinson S L, O'Reilly J, Wang W. Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(1): 203-231.
[16] Shao P, Li A, Mawritz M. Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018, 39(1): 12-25.
[17] Umphress E E, Simmons, A L, Folger R, et al. Observer reactions to interpersonal injustice: The roles of perpetrator intent and victim perception[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(3): 327-349.
[18] Van Heugten K. Bullying of social workers: Outcomes of a grounded study into impacts and interventions[J]. British Journal of Social Work, 2010, 40(2): 638-655.
[19] Westring A F, Ryan A M. Personality and inter-role conflict and enrichment: Investigating the mediating role of support[J]. Human Relations, 2010, 63(12): 1815-1834.
[20] Wu C H, Liu J, Kwan H K, et al. Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101(3): 362-378.
[21] Wu L Z, Birtch T A, Chiang F F, et al. Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2018, 44(5): 1873-1898.
[22] Yang J, Treadway D C. A social influence interpretation of workplace ostracism and counterproductive work behavior[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 148(4): 879-891.
Cite this article
Zhu Qianlin, Wei Feng, Du Hengbo. Workplace Ostracism and Bystander Behavior: The Role of Emotions and Goal Interdependence[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(6): 86-98.
Export Citations as:
For
