, 2
8830 
7169Because of increased external competition, enterprises are facing more volatile environment and survival & development pressure. It’s a very important problem about how to motivate followers to cooperate closely with leaders and pursue organizational goals and interests. For the past three decades, leadership scholars have paid a great amount of interests in training organizational leaders to motivate followers to go beyond their in-role obligations to contribute more to the collective benefits. Research suggests that one effective way for leaders to achieve this goal is to exhibit self-sacrificial behaviors. Therefore, self-sacrificial leadership has attracted much attention from scholars. Domestic and foreign scholars have gradually carried out some preliminary empirical research. This paper reviews systematically the previous studies on self-sacrificial leadership in the following respects. First of all, this paper introduces the concept connotation and measurement methods of self-sacrificial leadership. Self-sacrifice in organizational settings is defined as the total/partial abandonment, or permanent/temporary postponement of personal interests, privileges, or welfare in the division of labor, distribution of rewards, and exercise of power. Self-sacrifice in the division of labor involves volunteering for more risky or arduous actions, tasks, turns or segments of work in organizational settings. Self-sacrifice in the distribution of rewards involves giving up or postponing one’s fair and legitimate share of organizational rewards, such as salaries, benefits, promotion, vacations, recognition, and awards either permanently or temporarily. Self-sacrifice in the exercise of power involves voluntarily giving up or refraining from exercising or using the position power, privileges, or personal resources. There are three methods of measuring self-sacrificial leadership as for specific empirical research. This methods include scenario experiment, lab experiment and questionnaire scale. Secondly, this paper expounds the theoretical basis of self-sacrificial leadership. At present, domestic and foreign scholars have carried out the empirical study of self-sacrificial leadership based on the following theories. They respectively are social exchange theory, social learning theory, social identity theory, interpretation level theory, and emotional event theory. Again, the antecedents and outcome variables of self-sacrificial leadership are analyzed and summarized in this study. But for now, the research on the antecedents of self-sacrificial leadership is rather weak. The existing antecedents mainly include leaders’ sense of belongingness, subjectively sensed power and accountability. Compared to antecedent research, there are relatively lots of studies of outcome variables of self-sacrificial leadership. These outcome variables include perceptions of charisma, attributions of legitimacy, trust in supervisor, supervisor identification, organizational identification, employees cooperation, employee knowledge sharing, employee prosocial behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, employee proactive charge behavior, employee work performance, etc. In the end, the future directions in self-sacrificial leadership research are prospected. This paper provides the following reference for future self-sacrificial leadership research. （1） Based on the concept and manifestation of self-sacrifice leadership, future research will need to develop multidimensional measurement scale of self-sacrificial leadership, and carry out research on self-sacrificail leadership in different forms and types. （2） Future research will need to explore the antecedents of self-sacrifice leadership from the perspectives of leader personality traits, impression management and subordinates. （3） From the perspective of distal and cross-management top leadership, the scholars will need to investigate the effect of top managers’ self-sacrificial leadership on the employees’ behavior, and clarify its influence mechanism and boundary conditions in the future. （4） Future research will need to carry out the effect of self-sacrificial leadership on the outcome variables at the team level. （5） The scholars will need to reference the current trend of differentiated leadership research and carry out differentiated self-sacrificial leadership research in the future. （6） Based on the other theoretical perspectives, the scholars will need to keep on clarifying the influence mechanism of self-sacrificial leadership. （7） The scholars will need to carry out empirical study by comparing with other leadership styles in the future.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Self-sacrificial Leadership: A literature Review and Prospects
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 39, Issue 11, pp. 77 - 89 (2017) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2017.11.006
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Li R, Tian X, Sun J. The mechanisms of how self-sacrificial leadership impacts on employee knowledge sharing[J]. Nankai Management Review, 2014, 17(5): 24-32. (In Chinese)
[2] Li Y, Zhang W, Long L. How self-sacrificial leadership influences subordinates’ work performance: The mediating roles of strategic orientation and supervisor identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 653-662. (In Chinese)
[3] Liu W, Liao J, Huang S. Uncertainty avoidance, workload and leader empowering behavior: The moderating role of desirability for control and position[J]. Nankai Management Review, 2012, 15(5):4-12, 94. (In Chinese)
[4] Tian X, Li R. Can self-sacrificial leadership promote employee proactive behavior? The mediating effect of felt obligation and its boundary conditions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(12): 1472-1485. (In Chinese)
[5] Wang G, Huang W, Self-sacrificial leadership and follower’s prosocial behavior: Evidence from Taiwan’s service industry[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2013, 10(9): 1309-1315. (In Chinese)
[6] Zhang X, He H, Gu F. The influence of paternalistic leadership on team performance: the mediating role of team conflict management style[J]. Management of The World, 2009, (3): 121-133. (In Chinese)
[7] Zhang Z, Ju D, Ma L. Organizational behavior research in 2008—2011: A brief review and future direction for Chinese research[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 265-284. (In Chinese)
[8] Zhou R, Long L. The weakening effect of self-sacrificial leadership on team destructive conflict[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(9): 1339-1348. (In Chinese)
[9] Zhou R, Long L, He W. Self-sacrificial leadership and employees counterproductive behavior: The effect of leader identification and psychological entitlement[J]. Forecasting, 2016, 35(3):1-7. (In Chinese)
[10] Bandura A. Social learning theory[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
[11] Barsade S G, Gibson D E. Why does affect matter in organizations?[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2007, 21(1): 36-59.
[12] Burns J M. Leadership[M]. New York: Harper Collins, 1978.
[13] Choi Y, Mai-Dalton R R. On the leadership function of self-sacrifice[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1998, 9(4): 475-501.
[14] Choi Y, Mai-Dalton R R. The model of eollowers responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1999, 10(3): 397-421.
[15] Choi Y, Yoon J. Effects of leaders’ self-sacrificial behavior and competency on followers’ attribution of charismatic leadership among Americans and Koreans[J]. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2005, 11(5): 51-69.
[16] Conger J A, Kanungo R N. Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12(4): 637-647.
[17] Conger J A, Kanungo R N. Charismatic leadership in organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
[18] De Cremer D. Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(1): 79-93.
[19] De Cremer D, Mayer D M, Van Dijke M, et al. When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(4): 887-899.
[20] De Cremer D, Van Knippenberg D. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004, 95(2): 140-155.
[21] De Cremer D, Van Knippenberg D. Cooperation as a function of leader self-sacrifice, trust, and identification[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2005, 26(5): 355-369.
[22] De Cremer D, Van Dijke M, Bos A. Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2004, 25(5): 466-475.
[23] De Cremer D, Van Knippenberg D, Van Dijke M, et al. Self-Sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters[J]. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2006, 10(3): 233-245.
[24] De Jong A, Song M, Song L Z. How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(7): 1825-1854.
[25] Decoster S, Stouten J, Camps J, et al. The role of employees’ OCB and leaders’ hindrance stress in the emergence of self-serving leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(4): 647-659.
[26] Erdogan B, Bauer T N. Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010: 95(6): 1104-1120.
[27] Gagné M, Deci E L. Self-determination theory and work motivation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, 26(4): 331-362.
[28] Giessner S R, Van Knippenberg D, Van Ginkel W, et al. Team-oriented leadership: The interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(4): 658-667.
[29] Greguras G J, Diefendorff J M. Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(2): 465-477.
[30] Halverson S K, Holladay C L, Kazama S M, et al. Self-sacrificial behavior in crisis situations: The competing roles of behavioral and situational factors[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15(2): 263-275.
[31] Homans G C. Social behavior as exchange[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63(3): 597-606.
[32] Hoogervorst N, De Cremer D, Van Dijke M, et al. When do leaders sacrifice?: The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23(5): 883-896.
[33] Hunter E M, Neubert M J, Perry S J, et al. Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24(2): 316-331.
[34] Kaplan S, Cortina J, Ruark G, et al. The role of organizational leaders in employee emotion management: A theoretical model[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(3): 563-580.
[35] Kluemper D H, McLarty B D, Bing M N. Acquaintance ratings of the big five personality traits: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(1): 237-248.
[36] Li R, Zhang Z, Tian X. Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37(5): 758-781.
[37] Liberman N, Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(1): 5-18.
[38] Liberman N, Trope Y, McCrea S M, et al. The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43(1): 143-149.
[39] Mael F, Ashforth B E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992, 13(2): 103-123.
[40] Matteson J A, Irving J A. Servant versus self-sacrificial leadership: A behavioral comparison of two follower-oriented leadership theories[J]. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2006, 2(1): 36-51.
[41] Mawritz M B, Mayer D M, Hoobler J M, et al. A trickle-down model of abusive supervision[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2012, 65(2): 325-357.
[42] Mayer D M, Kuenzi M, Greenbaum R, et al. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of A trickle-down model[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 108(1): 1-13.
[43] Mulder L B, Nelissen R M A. When rules really make a difference: The effect of cooperation rules and self-sacrificing leadership on moral norms in social dilemmas[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 95(1): 57-72.
[44] Ruggieri S, Abbate C S. Leadership style, self-sacrifice, and team identification[J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2013, 41(7): 1171-1178.
[45] Ruiz P, Ruiz C, Martínez R. Improving the “leader–follower” relationship: Top manager or supervisor? The ethical leadership trickle-down effect on follower job response[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 99(4): 587-608.
[46] Schaubroeck J M, Peng A C, Hannah S T. Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(4): 1148-1168.
[47] Sluss D M, Ashforth B E. Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 9-32.
[48] Tajfel H. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations[M]. London: Academic Press, 1978.
[49] Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2007, 17(2): 83-95.
[50] Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance[J]. Psychological Review, 2010, 117(2): 440-463.
[51] Van Knippenberg B, Van Knippenberg D. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(1): 25-37.
[52] Walumbwa F O, Hartnell C A. Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84(1): 153-172.
[53] Walumbwa F O, Schaubroeck J. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1275-1286.
[54] Weiss H M, Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work[A]. Staw B M, Cummings L L(Eds.). Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews[C]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1996: 1-74.
[55] Wu J B, Tsui A S, Kinicki A J. Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(1): 90-106.
[56]
[57] Yorges S L, Weiss H M, Strickland O J. The effect of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84(3): 428-436.
[58] Zhou R Y, Long L R, Hao P. Positive affect, environmental uncertainty, and self-sacrificial leadership influence followers’ self-sacrificial behavior[J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2016, 44(9): 1515-1524.
Cite this article
Zhou Ruyi, Long Lirong. Self-sacrificial Leadership: A literature Review and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(11): 77–89.
Export Citations as:
For
