10044 
8842遏制腐败能否引导企业着眼长远？基于世界银行对中国企业的调查数据，本文实证检验了腐败程度如何改变企业在竞争压力下的创新和寻租决定。主要结论包括：企业在竞争压力下会增加创新投入，也会增加寻租支出；遏制腐败能够减少企业在竞争压力下的寻租行为，但对创新投入有显著的挤出效应。进一步研究发现，市场化改革滞后所引致的资源错配是产生挤出效应的主因。研究意义在于：引导企业着眼长远需要同时改善多个制度环境，除了充分发挥遏制腐败规避急功近利的行为外，还应当注重市场配置资源对引导企业长期战略导向的作用。研究结论凸显了市场在资源配置中起决定性作用的战略意义，也为反腐败政策提供了有力佐证。
着眼长远还是急功近利：竞争压力下腐败对企业创新和寻租的影响研究
摘要
参考文献
1 白明, 李国璋. 市场竞争与创新:熊彼特假说及其实证检验[J]. 中国软科学,2006, (11): 15-21 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2006.11.003
2 樊纲, 王小鲁, 朱恒鹏. 中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2011.
3 戈登•图洛克著, 王永钦, 丁菊红译. 特权和寻租的经济学[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2008.
7 Alexeev M, Song Y. Corruption and product market competition: An empirical investigation[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2013, 103: 154-166 DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.02.010
8 Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[A]. Nelson R R. The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1962.
9 Baumol W J. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1990, 98(5): 893-921 DOI:10.1086/261712
10 Correa J A, Ornaghi C. Competition & innovation: Evidence from U. S. patent and productivity data[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics,2014, 62(2): 258-285 DOI:10.1111/joie.2014.62.issue-2
11 Delmas M A, Toffel M W. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008, 29(10): 1027-1055 DOI:10.1002/smj.v29:10
12 Diaby A, Sylwester K. Corruption and market competition: Evidence from post-communist countries[J]. World Development,2015, 66: 487-499 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.003
14 Mahagaonkar P. Corruption and innovation[A]. Mahagaonkar P. Money and ideas: Four studies on finance, innovation and the business life cycle[M]. New York: Springer, 2010: 81–97.
15 Martin K D, Cullen J B, Johnson J L, et al. Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(6): 1401-1422 DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28179462
16 North D C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
17 Rudy B C, Johnson A F. Performance, aspirations, and market versus nonmarket investment[J]. Journal of Management,2016, 42(4): 936-959 DOI:10.1177/0149206313503017
18 Schumpeter J A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy[M]. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1947.
19 Shleifer A. Does competition destroy ethical behavior?[J]. American Economic Review,2004, 94(2): 414-418 DOI:10.1257/0002828041301498
20 Spencer J, Gomez C. MNEs and corruption: The impact of national institutions and subsidiary strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2011, 32(3): 280-300 DOI:10.1002/smj.v32.3
21 Tang J M. Competition and innovation behaviour[J]. Research Policy,2006, 35(1): 68-82 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004
22 Turner S F, Mitchell W, Bettis R A. Responding to rivals and complements: How market concentration shapes generational product innovation strategy[J]. Organization Science,2010, 21(4): 854-872 DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0486
23 Uhlenbruck K, Rodriguez P, Doh J, et al. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies[J]. Organization Science,2006, 17(3): 402-414 DOI:10.1287/orsc.1060.0186
24 Venard B, Hanafi M. Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2008, 81(2): 481-498 DOI:10.1007/s10551-007-9519-9
26 Wu X. Determinants of bribery in Asian firms: Evidence from the world business environment survey[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2009, 87(1): 75-88 DOI:10.1007/s10551-008-9871-4
27 You J, Nie H H. Who determines Chinese firms’ engagement in corruption: Themselves or neighbors?[J]. China Economic Review,2017, 43: 29-46 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.002
引用本文
徐晨, 孙元欣. 着眼长远还是急功近利：竞争压力下腐败对企业创新和寻租的影响研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(11): 129-143.
导出参考文献，格式为：
