How to stimulate consumers to sustain and repeat green consumption is not only a realistic problem for enterprises to carry out the all-round diversified green marketing and implement the environment-friendly development strategy, but also an important research field to be urgently promoted by academia. Previous studies have drawn on the relevant theories of environmental psychology and social psychology to deeply analyze consumers’ green consumption behavior. They have taken social psychological factors and their influence mechanism as the research perspective, which has initially formed the research paradigm that takes the three levels of individual psychology, group interaction and social influence as the logical main line to decode the password of green consumption behavior and interpret the attitude-behavior gap. But the existing research basically concentrates on the pre-consumption decision-making process and influencing factors by tacitly approving green consumption behavior as consumers’ first or single consumption behavior, and seldom discusses the post-consumption process and green repeated consumption behavior. In fact, green repeated consumption behavior is significantly different from the first or single green consumption behavior, and its formation mechanism and influencing factors are not clear. Whether and how consumers’ first or previous green consumption behavior affects their green repeated consumption behavior requires further discussion of academia. According to the feedback effect principle, the feedback of the positive result evaluation of individual behavior to the individual will promote and motivate the individual, and strengthen the repetition of individual behavior. The feedback of enterprises to consumers’ post-consumption behavior will affect consumers’ evaluation of the brand and consumption behavior. The positive post-consumption feedback of enterprises can significantly improve consumers’ sense of acquisition, achievement and happiness, and provide them extra meaning beyond benefit to encourage consumers to repeat consumption behavior. In view of the above, in the field of green consumption, whether enterprises’ post-consumption feedback strategies will also form the feedback effect on consumers’ green repurchasing behavior is the main focus of this study. Based on the social exchange theory, warm-glow theory and cognition-emotion theory, this study investigates the effects of different post-consumption value feedback strategies on green repeated consumption intention and verifies the mediating role of warm-glow in the influence mechanism above and the moderating role of feedback timing in the influence mechanism above through three experiments. ExperimentⅠ demonstrates that compared with the non-value feedback, the value feedback of green consumption can significantly enhance consumers’ repeated consumption intention; furthermore, social value feedback has a more positive effect than functional value feedback. ExperimentⅡ demonstrates that warm-glow plays a mediating role in the relationship between the value feedback of green consumption and green repeated consumption intention, and social value feedback can enhance consumers’ warm-glow more than functional value feedback. ExperimentⅢ demonstrates that the mediating effect of warm-glow is moderated by feedback timing, that is, for the instant feedback, the mediation effect of warm-glow does exist, but for the delayed feedback, the mediation effect of warm-glow does not exist. This study provides a new perspective for promoting green repeated consumption, and also provides theoretical basis for enterprises to develop efficient green post-consumption marketing strategies.
Will Enterprise Feedback Promote Green Repeated Consumption Intention? An Empirical Study on the Impact of Post-consumption Value Feedback on Consumers’ Green Repeated Consumption Intention
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 41, Issue 10, pp. 3 - 16 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190813.002
 Bu Qingjuan, Jin Yongsheng, Li Zhaohui. Does interactive behavior certainly create value？The effect of customer value co-creation interactive behavior on customer value[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2016, 38(9): 21-37, 50.
 Jiao Juanni1, Fan Jun. A literature review and prospects of customer-enterprise social value co-creation[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(2): 72-83.
 Li Dongjin, Zhang Yudong. Why consumers give up: The mechanism underlying the formation of willingness to continue participating in quantified self[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(1): 118-131.
 Sheng Guanghua, Gong Siyu, Ge Wanda. Can brand green extension enhance consumer response? A research on the effects of congruence between the green extension type and processing mindset[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(4): 98-110.
 Sheng Guanghua, Yue Beibei, Xie Fang. The driving mechanism of Chinese residents’ green consumption behavior from the perspective of environmental co-governance[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2019, 34(1): 109-116.
 Wang Hanying, Xing Hongwei, Tian Hong. Position the “golden quadrant” of green consumption: A response surface analysis based on the stereotype content model[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(3): 203-214.
 Wu Ruijuan, Li Dongjin. The outcome valence, mental simulation and regret[J]. Journal of Marketing Science, 2014, 10(3): 51-61.
 Zhu Huawei, Zhang Yanyan, Gong Xuan. Does company’s humor resolve consumer complaining: The match of humor types and relationship norms[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 526-538.
 Abbott A, Nandeibam S, O’Shea L. Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 90(6): 10-18.
 Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, et al. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005, 25(3): 273-291.
 Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving[J]. The Economic Journal, 1990, 100(401): 464-477.
 Arroyo D C, Yilmaz Y. An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer‐mediated communication[J]. Language Learning, 2018, 68(4): 942-972.
 Brekke K A, Kverndokk S, Nyborg K. An economic model of moral motivation[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2003, 87(9-10): 1967-1983.
 Cheng Y H, Huang C J, Chuang S C, et al. Burger or yogurt? Indulgent consumption in impression management contexts[J]. International Journal of Psychology, 2015, 50(5): 345-353.
 Clark C F, Kotchen M J, Moore M R. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(3): 237-246.
 Cropanzano R, Mitchell M S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review[J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(6): 874-900.
 Ferguson E, Flynn N. Moral relativism as a disconnect between behavioural and experienced warm glow[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2016, 56(10): 163-175.
 Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 351-401.
 Frömer R, Stürmer B, Sommer W. The better, the bigger: The effect of graded positive performance feedback on the reward positivity[J]. Biological Psychology, 2016, 114(2): 61-68.
 Gershoff A D, Frels J K. What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2015, 79(1): 97-110.
 Giboney J S, Briggs R O, Nunamaker Jr J F. Special issue: Creating social value with information[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2017, 34(4): 935-938.
 Giebelhausen M, Chun H H, Cronin Jr J J, et al. Adjusting the warm-glow thermostat: How incentivizing participation in voluntary green programs moderates their impact on service satisfaction[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2016, 80(4): 56-71.
 Gouldner A W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement[J]. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25(2): 161-178.
 Graciola A P, De Toni D, De Lima V Z, et al. Does price sensitivity and price level influence store price image and repurchase intention in retail markets?[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, 44(9): 201-213.
 Gupta S, Ogden D T. To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2009, 26(6): 376-391.
 Gutiérrez-Cobo M J, Cabello R, Fernández-Berrocal P. The relationship between emotional intelligence and cool and hot cognitive processes: A systematic review[J]. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2016, 10(5): 101-113.
 Habel J, Schons L M, Alavi S, et al. Warm glow or extra charge? The ambivalent effect of corporate social responsibility activities on customers’ perceived price fairness[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2016, 80(1): 84-105.
 Harbaugh W T, Mayr U, Burghart D R. Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations[J]. Science, 2007, 316(5831): 1622-1625.
 Hartmann P, Eisend M, Apaolaza V, et al. Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in pro-environmental behavior?[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, 52(10): 43-55.
 Hassan L, Dias A, Hamari J. How motivational feedback increases user’s benefits and continued use: A study on gamification, quantified-self and social networking[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2019, 46(6): 151-162.
 Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2013.
 Kinnaman T C. Policy watch: Examining the justification for residential recycling[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20(4): 219-232.
 Liobikienė G, Bernatonienė J. Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162(9): 109-120.
 Ma C B, Burton M. Warm glow from green power: Evidence from Australian electricity consumers[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016, 78(7): 106-120.
 Mazar N, Zhong C B. Do green products make us better people?[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 21(4): 494-498.
 Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D. Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2004, 14(1-2): 159-167.
 Motyka S, Grewal D, Aguirre E, et al. The emotional review-reward effect: How do reviews increase impulsivity?[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, 46(6): 1032-1051.
 Olson E L. It’s not easy being green: The effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2013, 41(2): 171-184.
 Ribar D C, Wilhelm M O. Altruistic and joy-of-giving motivations in charitable behavior[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2002, 110(2): 425-457.
 Richards J M, Gross J J. Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one's cool[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(3): 410-424.
 Shintani N, Aubrey S. The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2016, 100(1): 296-319.
 Steel P, König C J. Integrating theories of motivation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(4): 889-913.
 Wang K Y, Liang M L, Peracchio L A. Strategies to offset dissatisfactory product performance: The role of post-purchase marketing[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(8): 809-815.
 Weber B J, Chapman G B. The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect?[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 96(2): 104-118.
Cite this article
Sheng Guanghua, Yue Beibei, Gong Siyu. Will Enterprise Feedback Promote Green Repeated Consumption Intention? An Empirical Study on the Impact of Post-consumption Value Feedback on Consumers’ Green Repeated Consumption Intention[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(10): 3-16.
Previous: The Research Trend and Future Research on Status from the Perspective of Inter-organizational Network