Home country determinants are considered important driving factors pertaining to the internationalization of new ventures. Prior research on how home country environment influences the internationalization of new ventures has identified a number of challenges faced by the literature of international new ventures. This stream of research has enriched the body of knowledge for international entrepreneurship literature to a great extent. Our study provides a systematic review on the literature addressing the phenomenon of international new ventures and born global firms from a home country perspective. Our framework considers three sets of home country factors – network, industrial, and institutional. We introduce the effects of domestic business networks, social networks and institutional networks on the international behavior and performance of international new ventures. We emphasize the role of different characteristics of the whole domestic industrial environment and specific industrial clusters using an industry-based view. Also, formal and informal domestic institutions and how they enable new ventures to expand to international markets are discussed. By reviewing the relevant studies published in leading journals in the past two decades, we offer new insights of the three mechanisms(escape, capability building and organizational learning)as building blocks for the internationalization of new ventures. Each set of home country factors(network, industrial and institutional)and their mechanisms are discussed respectively. We draw the conclusion that the role of country origin and interaction or substitute effects of existing mechanisms are understudied, and a cognitive perspective could also be adopted in future research considering the effects of home country determinants. Our review presents critical implications for future research directions in international entrepreneurship.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
The Impact of Home Country Determinants onthe Internationalization of New Ventures:A Review and Prospects
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 41, Issue 08, pp. 3 - 16 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.08.001
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Zhou J, Huang S. A review of the literature on international entrepreneurship from the perspective of relationship networks[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2013, 35(2): 22-33.
[2] Zhu X, Zhang Y, Li M. A review on the development of international entrepreneurship research and future perspectives[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2011, 33(11): 21-28.
[3] Al-Laham A, Souitaris V. Network embeddedness and new venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008, 23(5): 567-586.
[4] Autio E, Almeida J G. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(5): 909-924.
[5] Bangara A, Freeman S, Schroder, W. Legitimacy and accelerated internationalisation: An Indian perspective[J]. Journal of World Business, 2012, 47(4): 623-634.
[6] Cavusgil S T, Knight G. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 3-16.
[7] Cheng H L, Yu C M J. Institutional pressures and initiation of internationalization: Evidence from Taiwanese small- and medium-sized enterprises[J]. International Business Review, 2008, 17(3): 331-348.
[8] De Clercq D, Sapienza H J, Yavuz R I, et al. Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research: Past accomplishments and future directions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(1): 143-165.
[9] De Clercq D, Sapienza H J, Zhou L. Entrepreneurial strategic posture and learning effort in international ventures: The moderating roles of operational flexibilities[J]. International Business Review, 2014, 23(5): 981-992.
[10] Deng Z, Jean R J B, Sinkovics R R. Rapid expansion of international new ventures across institutional distance[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, (5): 1-23.
[11] Fan T, Phan P. International new ventures: Revisiting the influences behind the ‘born-global’ firm[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(7): 1113-1131.
[12] Fernhaber S A, Mcdougall P P, Oviatt B M. Exploring the role of industry structure in new venture internationalization[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2007, 31(4): 517-542.
[13] Fernhaber S A, Mcdougall-Covin P P, Shepherd D A. International entrepreneurship: leveraging internal and external knowledge sources[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2010, 3(4), 297-320.
[14] Fernhaber S A, Li D. The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010, 34(1): 1-30.
[15] Fernhaber S A, Li D. International exposure through network relationships: Implications for new venture internationalization[J]. Journal of Business Venturing , 2013, 28(2): 316-334.
[16] Freeman S, Edwards R, Schroder B. How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2006, 14(3): 33-63.
[17] Gaur A S, Ma X, Ding Z. Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from china[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(3), 324-345.
[18] Johanson J, Vahlne J E. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 40(9): 1411-1431.
[19] Karafyllia M, Zucchella A. Synergies and tensions between and within domestic and international market activities of firms[J]. International Business Review, 2017, 26(5):942-958.
[20] Kiss A N, Danis W M. Social networks and speed of new venture internationalization during institutional transition: A conceptual model[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2010, 8(3): 273-287.
[21] Knight G A, Liesch P W. Internationalization: From incremental to born global[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(1): 93-102.
[22] Laanti R, Gabrielsson M, Gabrielsson P. The globalization strategies of business-to-business born global firms in the wireless technology industry[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2006, 36(8), 1104-1117.
[23] Lin S, Mercier-Suissa C, Salloum C. The Chinese born globals of the Zhejiang Province: A study on the key factors for their rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2016, 14(1): 75-95.
[24] Liu X, Gao L, Lu J, et al. Does learning at home and from abroad boost the foreign subsidiary performance of emerging economy multinational enterprises[J]? International Business Review, 2015, 25(1): 141-151.
[25] Lu Y, Zhou L, Bruton G, et al. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(3): 419-436.
[26] Luo Y. Dynamic capabilities in international expansion[J]. Journal of World Business, 2000, 35(4): 355-378.
[27] Ma X, Ding Z, Yuan L. Subnational institutions, political capital, and the internationalization of entrepreneurial firms in emerging economies[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(5): 843-854.
[28] Meyer K E, Ding Y, Li J, et al. Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2014, 45(8): 1005-1028.
[29] Milanov H, Fernhaber S A. When do domestic alliances help ventures abroad? Direct and moderating effects from a learning perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, 29(3): 377-391.
[30] Muralidharan E, Pathak S. Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship[J]. International Business Review, 2017, 26(2): 288-302.
[31] Nadkarni S. Prior conditions and early international commitment: The mediating role of domestic mindset[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(1): 160-176.
[32] Nasra R, Dacin M T. Institutional arrangements and international entrepreneurship: The state as institutional entrepreneur [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010, 34(3): 583-609.
[33] Naudé W, Rossouw S. Early international entrepreneurship in China: Extent and determinants[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2010, 8(1): 87-111.
[34] Oparaocha G O. SMEs and international entrepreneurship: An institutional network perspective[J]. International Business Review, 2015, 24(5): 861-873.
[35] Oviatt B M, McDougall P P. Toward a theory of international new ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 25(1): 45-64.
[36] Oviatt B M, Mcdougall P P. The internationalization of entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2005, 36(1): 2-8.
[37] Peng M W, Chen H. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2009, 23(3):63-81.
[38] Prashantham S, S Young. Post-entry speed of international new ventures[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, 35(2): 275-292.
[39] Sapienza H J, De Clercq D, Sandberg W R. Antecedents of international and domestic learning effort[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(4): 437-457.
[40] Sigfusson T, Harris S. Domestic market context and international entrepreneurs’ relationship portfolios[J]. International Business Review, 2013, 22(1): 243-258.
[41] Yamakawa Y, Peng M W, Deeds D L. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies[J]? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010, 32(1): 59-82.
[42] Zaheer S. Overcome the liability of foreignness[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 38(2): 341-363.
[43] Zahra S A. 2005. A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2005, 36(1): 20-28.
[44] Zahra S A, Zheng C, Yu J. Learning advantages of newness: A reconceptualization and contingent framework[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2017, 16(5): 1-26.
[45] Zahra S A, Korri J S, Yu J. Cognition and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation[J]. International Business Review, 2005, 14(2): 129-146.
[46] Zhang X, Ma X, Y. Wang, et al. What drives the internationalization of Chinese SMEs? The joint effects of international entrepreneurship characteristics, network ties, and firm ownership[J]. International Business Review, 2016, 25(2): 522-534.
[47] Zhou L. Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 673-690.
[48] Zhou L, Barnes B R, Lu Y. Entrepreneurial proclivity, capability upgrading and performance advantage of newness among international new ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(5):882-905.
[49] Zucchella A, Palamara G, Denicolai S. The drivers of the early internationalization of the firm[J]. Journal of World Business, 2007, 42(3): 268-280.
Cite this article
Zhong Xiaotong, Zhou Lianxi, Luo Huiying. The Impact of Home Country Determinants onthe Internationalization of New Ventures:A Review and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(8): 3-16.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES