8650 
9241近年来,越来越多的企业通过提升组织即兴运作水平来改善组织战略能力和获取竞争优势。本文以社会网络和组织学习理论为基础,构建出一个组织即兴形成机制的概念模型,以各类具有即兴运作经验的企业为研究对象,分析了企业社会网络、组织学习与组织即兴之间的形成机制。本文的研究结论拓展了组织即兴的现有理论,并为进一步研究组织即兴相关主题研究提供了理论基础,对企业提升组织即兴能力也具有一定的指导意义。
组织即兴的形成机制研究:基于社会网络和组织学习理论
摘要
参考文献
1 Ahuja G. Collaboration networks,structural holes,and innovation:A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45
2 Bergh D D and LIM E. Learning how to restructure:Absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 593–616
3 Bian and Yanjie. Bringing strong ties back in:Indirect connection,Network bridges,and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 1997, 62(3): 366–385
4 Brown J S and Duguid P. Organization learning and communities-of-practice:Towards a unified view of working,learning and innovation. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 40–57
5 BurtR SStructural holes:The social structural of competitionCambridge:Harvard University Press1992
6 Chen M H, Chang Y C and Hung S C. Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 2008, 38(1): 21–34
7 ColemanJ SFoundations of social theoryCambridge:Harvard University Press1990
8 Cohen W M and Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128–152
9 Cunha M P, et al. Organizational improvisation:From the constraint of strict tempo to the power of the Avant-Garde. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2014, 23(4): 359–373
10 Cunha M P, Cunha J V and Kamoche K. Organizational improvisation:What,when,how and why. International Journal of Management Review, 1999, 1(3): 299–341
11 Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360–1380
12 Granovetter M S. Economic action and social structure:The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3): 481–510
13 Gulati R. Network location and learning:The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5): 397–420
14 Leybourne S and Smith E. The role of intuition and improvisation in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24(6): 483–492
15 Magni, et al. The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 2009, 38(3): 1044–1053
16 March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71–87
17 Marsden P V. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 1990, 16(1): 435–463
18 McAllister D J. Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 38(1): 24–59
19 Miner A S, Bassoff P and Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning:A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(2): 304–307
20 Moorman C and Miner A S. The convergence of planning and execution:Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 1998, 162(3): 1–20
21 Moran P. Structural vs relational embeddedness:Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(12): 1129–1151
22 Morgan R M and Hunt S B. The commitment-trust theory of relationships marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(3): 20–38
23 NanakaL and Takeuehi HThe knowledge-creating company:How japanese companies create dynamics of innovationNewYork:Oxford University Press1995
24 Powell W W, et al. Network dynamics and field evolution:The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 2005, 110(4): 1132–1205
25 RowleyT J. Moving beyond dyadic ties:A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(4): 887–910
26 SehamAWhose improve is it anyway beyond second cityOxford:University Press of Mississippi2001
27 Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996–1004
28 Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in inter firm networks:The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1): 35–67
29 Vera D and Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 2005, 16(3): 203–224
30 Weick K E. The collapse of sense making in organizations:The mann gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38(4): 628–652
31 Weick K E. Introductory essay:Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization science, 1998, 9(5): 543–555
32 Yaleinkaya G, Calantone R J and Griffith D A. An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities:Implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(4): 63–93
33 Zaheer A, McEvily B and Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of inter-organizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 1998, 9(2): 141–159
34 边 燕杰, 丘 海雄. 企业的社会资本及其功效. 中国社会科学, 2000 (2): 87–99
35 边 燕杰, 张 文宏. 经济体制、社会网络与职业流动. 中国社会科学, 2001 (2): 77–89
36 曹 光明, 陈 启杰, 武 文珍. 组织即兴的概念内涵、研究视角及理论演进探析. 外国经济与管理, 2012 (8): 35–42
37 窦 红宾, 王 正斌. 网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究:利用性学习、探索性学习的中介作用. 南开管理评论, 2011 (3): 15–25
38 彭 灿, 李 金蹊. 团队外部社会资本对团队学习能力的影响--以企业研发团队为样本的实证研究. 科学学研究, 2011 (9): 1374–1381
39 蒲 明. 组织即兴、组织学习和组织记忆三者关系的研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007 (9): 154–157
40 陶 厚永, 王 秀江, 刘 洪. 组织即兴及其对企业应对危机的意义研究. 外国经济与管理, 2009, 9: 53–59
41 谢 洪明, 葛 志良, 王 成. 社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究. 管理工程学报, 2008 (1): 5–10
42 于 海波, 郑 晓明, 方 俐洛, 凌 文辁. 中国企业开发式学习与利用式学习平衡的实证研究. 科研管理, 2008 (6): 137–144
43 朱 朝晖. 探索性学习、挖掘性学习和创新绩效. 科学学研究, 2008 (4): 860–867
引用本文
王军, 曹光明, 江若尘. 组织即兴的形成机制研究:基于社会网络和组织学习理论[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(2): 33–48.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：消费者心理逆反研究现状与展望
