6518 
7555Based on unique context in China, Luo Yadong and other scholars put forward Chinese management " amalgamation” theory. The " amalgamation” theory includes four parts: " composition” explains the usage logic of internal and external resources; " cooperation” reflects the development logic of external relations; " combination” embodies the dual logic of organization evolution; " conformity” expresses the management logic of organization strategy and growth. The " amalgamation” theory needs more in-depth theoretical expansion and empirical analysis. Cooperation strategy is an important part of the " amalgamation” theory. In order to deepen the understanding of the cooperation strategy, the followings are carried out in this paper. First, cooperation strategy is defined and classified. Cooperation strategy refers to the actions that the enterprise takes together with external organizations or enterprises in order to achieve the compatible goal of mutual benefits. According to the objects and their characteristics, cooperation strategy could be divided into three forms: vertical cooperation refers to the cooperation in the same industry chain; horizontal cooperation means the cooperation with new or existing competitors in the same industry; lateral cooperation takes place with enterprises, institutions and individuals with outside of the industry or the industry chain. Second, the motivations to adopt cooperation strategy are explored. The choice of enterprise strategy is constrained by the institutional environment and the social environment. At present, China has two notable context characteristics: strong relationship and strong institution. Therefore, this paper analyzes the institutional motivation and relational motivation of SMEs’ cooperation strategy from enterprise and entrepreneur levels. Finally, the impact of cooperation strategy on the competitive advantages, such as the speed advantage, the cost advantage and the customer satisfaction, is tested. This paper conducts an empirical test based on the questionnaire data of 796 SMEs in 21 cities in China. The empirical results show that: （1） enterprises’ abilities to manage external relationship have positive effects on all three kinds of cooperation strategy; （2） enterprises’ governmental regulations only have a positive impact on the lateral cooperation; （3） entrepreneurs’ industry ties have positive effects on all three kinds of cooperation strategy; （4） entrepreneurs’ political ties have a positive impact on the vertical and lateral cooperation; （5） cooperation strategy is benefit for SMEs to improve their speed advantage, cost advantage and customer satisfaction. The conclusions not only lay a solid foundation for the " amalgamation” theory, enriching the construction of China’s management theories, but also provide useful references and inspiration for SMEs in emerging economies to achieve rapid development through cooperation strategy.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Motivations of Cooperation Strategy and Their Impacts on Firms’ Competitive Advantages: Based on the “Amalgamation” Theory
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 07, pp. 3 - 18 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.07.001
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Hu Xuyang. Private entrepreneurs' political identity and financing facilitate of private enterprise [J]. Management World, 2006 (5): 107-113, 141.
[2] Long Yong, Zheng Jingli. Research on the relationship of alliance ability and alliance governance from alliance process management perspective [J]. Management World, 2013 (1): 182-183.
[3] Luo Yadong, Sun Jinyun. A new perspective for the growth strategy of Chinese enterprise: concept, connotation and method of composition based view [J]. Management World, 2013 (10): 106-117, 141.
[4] Luo Yadong, Sun Jinyun. The motivation of composition based view and its influence on competitive advantage [J]. Management World, 2014 (7): 93-106.
[5] Luo Yadong, Sun Jinyun, Wu Yajun. " Amalgamation " theory - a new paradigm of strategic theory based on the eastern culture background [J]. foreign economy and management, 2015 (6): 3-25, 28.
[6] Wang Hui, Xin Rong, Xu Shuying. Leadership behavior of Chinese enterprise CEO and its impact on enterprises’ business performance[J]. Management World, 2006 (4): 87-96, 139.
[7] Wu Junmin. The organization operation of the industry association: a social capital analysis perspective [J]. Management World, 2005 (10): 50-57.
[8] Xu Erming, Xu Kai. Research on the impact of resource complementarity on opportunism and the performance of strategic alliance [J]. Management World, 2012 (1): 93-103.
[9] Yang Yongheng, Wang Yonggui, Zhong Xudong. The connotation, driving factors and growth dimensions of customer relationship management [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2002 (2): 48-52.
[10] Zhao Yongliang, Zhang Jie. Research on the chamber of commerce’s service function ——public goods or club product supply [J]. Management World, 2009 (12): 48-56, 66.
[11]Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management，1991, 17（1）: 99-120.
[12] Baum J A C, Calabrese T, Silverman B S. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in
canadian biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management Journal，2000, 21（3）: 267-294.
[13]Buchanan J M. An economic theory of clubs[J]. Economica，1965, 32（125）: 1-14.
[14]Burgess Jr G H. The economics of regulation and antitrust[M]. New York: Addison Wesley, 1997.
[15] Cullinane N, Dundon T. The psychological contract: A critical review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews，2006,8（2）: 113-129.
[16]Dagnino B G, Rocco E. Coopetition strategy: Theory, experiments and cases[M]. London: Routledge, 2009.
[17]Das T K, Teng B S. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances[J]. Journal of Management，2000, 26（1）: 31-61.
[18] Dwyer F R, Welsh M A. Environmental relationships of the internal political economy of marketing channels[J]. Journal of
Marketing Research，1985, 22（4）: 397-414.
[19] Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly，1995,40（4）: 619-652.
[20]Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation[J].
Strategic Management Journal，1999, 20（5）: 397-420.
[21]Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. Strategic networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal，2000, 21（3）: 203-215.
[22]Harrison J S, Hitt M A, Hoskisson R E, et al. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to
organizational alliances[J]. Journal of Management，2001, 27（6）: 679-690.
[23]Inkpen A C, Tsang E W K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer[J]. The Academy of Management Review，2005,30（1）: 146-165.
[24]Lee C, Lee K, Pennings J M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based
ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal，2001, 22（6-7）: 615-640.
[25]Luo Y D. A coopetition perspective of global competition[J]. Journal of World Business，2007, 42（2）: 129-144.
[26] Mitsuhashi H, Greve H R. A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and
compatibility[J]. The Academy of Management Journal，2009, 52（5）: 975-995.
[27]Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views[J]. Strategic Management
Journal，1997, 18（9）: 697-713.
[28] Oosterhuis M, Van Der Vaart T, Molleman E. Perceptions of technology uncertainty and the consequences for performance in buyer-supplier relationships[J]. International Journal of Production Research，2011, 49（20）: 6155-6173.
[29]Park S H, Ungson G R. The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint
venture dissolution[J]. The Academy of Management Journal，1997, 40（2）: 279-307.
[30] Reinartz W, Krafft M, Hoyer W D. The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on
performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research，2004, 41（3）: 293-305.
[31]Robinson S L. Trust and breach of the psychological contract[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly，1996, 41（4）: 574-599.
[32]Sun P, Mellahi K, Wright M. The contingent value of corporate political ties[J]. Academy of Management Perspective，2012,26（3）: 68-82.
[33]Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza H J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology based Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal，2001, 22（6-7）: 587-613.
Cite this article
Sun Jinyun, Luo Yadong, Zhou Ying. Motivations of Cooperation Strategy and Their Impacts on Firms’ Competitive Advantages: Based on the “Amalgamation” Theory[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(7): 3-18.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
