As the consumer cost of shar information is reduced, the content and quality of consumer-generated marketing information become increasingly difficult to control. How to induce consumers to share the marketing information generated by the company in favor of brand images has become a significant problem that companies need to solve in the era of new media. As an individual’s adaptive response to stimuli, emotions have been shown to influence individual decision-making, but the mechanism of how emotions influence the process of consumer information sharing is still a brand-new topic that urgently needs attention and discussion. Based on the study of existing domestic and foreign literature, this paper mainly draws the following conclusions. First, the relationship between emotions, information, and sharing behaviors is mainly achieved through direct and intermediary paths. In the direct path, emotions are apparent in the information. Consumers can intuitively obtain emotional feelings through marketing information, and make quick judgments and decisions based on explicit emotions in the information. There is no need to integrate external marketing information and consumers’ internal memory and association. In the intermediary path, emotions result from the stimuli of marketing information. Besides the marketing information itself, the presentation form and the presentation environment of marketing information can be used as stimuli to influence consumers’ emotions, and then affect their sharing behaviors. Existing research focuses more on the intermediary path of emotions and ignores the direct path of emotions. Second, when discussing the differences in the effects of different emotions on information sharing behaviors, based on the emotion classification theory, scholars mainly discuss three aspects which respectively are emotion types, valence and arousal. It is found that information containing emotions are more communicative than those with no emotion. However, the current studies have not reached a consistent conclusion about whether positive or negative emotions are more likely to lead to consumers’ sharing behaviors. Third, based on the logic of " stimulus induce emotions and emotions induce behaviors”, the functional process of information, emotions and sharing behaviors can be separated into three phases that each phase has a different theoretical basis. The emotional contagion theory and the emotion priming theory are mainly used to explain why external information stimuli can lead to different emotional changes. The emotion regulation theory is mainly used to explain why consumers will share information after experiencing emotional changes. The selective awareness theory and the negative bias theory is mainly used to explain why different emotions lead to different sharing behaviors. Future research can deeply explore the mechanism of emotions in the process of marketing information sharing, and the individual’s choice and processing mechanism for marketing information. In order to better explain the issue of " what information consumers are more willing to share”, it can be discussed specifically in the following three aspects: the emotions’ influence on re-dissemination of marketing information, the " emotional preference” effect of information media, and the mechanism of mixed emotions.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Literature Review and Prospects of Sharing of Marketing Information: Based on the Perspective of Emotions
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 09, pp. 143 - 152 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.09.011
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Cao Yang, Wang Lin. Processing of emotional information in written language[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018,63(02): 148-163.
[2] Chang Yaping, Dong Xuebing. Consumption information sharing behavior in virtual community[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2014(1): 201-207, 200.
[3] Deng Qiaoxi, Wang Cheng, Zhou Zhimin. A literature review of social media marketing[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2015, 37(1): 32-42.
[4] Ding Xuwu, Wu Zhong, Xia Zhijie. The empirical research of sentiment factors effect on users’ retweet behavior — A case study of Sina Weibo[J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2014, 34(11): 147-155.
[5] Du Jiangang, Fan Xiucheng. The impact of customer’s loss and emotion on recovery expectation and complaining intention under the service failure circumstancevice failure circumstance[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2007, 10(6): 4-10, 18.
[6] Guo Tingting, Cui Lixia, Wang Yan. Emotional complexity: A new perspective on the functions of emotion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2011, 19(7): 993-1002.
[7] Liu Cong, Xie Yungen, Wan Xuanao. Relationship between microblog emotion and diffusion across different user types: An empirical study based on 24 public events[J]. Journalism & Communication, 2015(9): 92-106.
[8] Pan Fada. The conflict reaction of mixed emotions processing[D]. East China Normal University, 2013.
[9] Xu Xiang. Research on the effect and features of emotional bias in th communication of Sina social news: An web mining and empirical analysis based in Sina social news[J]. Chinese Journal of International & Communication, 2017, 39(4): 76-94.
[10] Yue Guoan, Dong Yinghong. On the categorical and dimensional approaches of the theories of the basic structure of emotions[J]. Nankai Journal(Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 2013(1): 140-150.
[11] Zhong Yiping, Fan Wei, Cai Ronghua, et al. The influence of positive emotion on the degree effect in self-referential processes: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 341-352.
[12] Zhou Rongfu, Zhang Lian, Zhang Yaming. The impact of information content pushed by We Chat public platform on customer brand loyalty[J]. Commercial Research, 2016, 62(6): 141-147.
[13] Zhu Yongze, Mao Weibin, Wang Rui, The neural mechanism of negative bias[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1393-1403.
[14] Akpinar E, Berger J. Valuable virality[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2017, 54(2): 318-330.
[15] Berger J. Arousal increases social transmission of information[J]. Psychological Science, 2011, 22(7): 891-893.
[16] Berger J, Milkman K L. Emotion and virality: What makes online content go viral?[J]. GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, 2013, 5(1): 18-23.
[17] Berger J, Milkman K L. What makes online content viral?[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2012, 49(2): 192-205.
[18] Berger J, Schwartz E M. What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth?[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, 48(5): 869-880.
[19] Brooks A W, Schweitzer M E. Can nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 115(1): 43-54.
[20] Ekman P, Friesen W V. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17(2): 124-129.
[21] Forgas J P, George J M. Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 86(1): 3-34.
[22] Fredrickson B L, Branigan C. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2005, 19(3): 313-332.
[23] Gross J J. Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2015, 26(1): 1-26.
[24] Hansen L K, Arvidsson A, Nielsen F A, et al. Good friends, bad news — Affect and virality in Twitter[A]. Park J J, Yang L T, Lee C. Future information technology[C]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
[25] Hatfield E, Cacioppo J T, Rapson R L. Emotional contagion[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1993, 2(3): 96-100.
[26] Heath C. Do people prefer to pass along good or bad news? Valence and relevance of news as predictors of transmission propensity[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, 68(2): 79-94.
[27] Heath C, Bell C, Sternberg E. Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(6): 1028-1041.
[28] Howard D J, Gengler C. Emotional contagion effects on product attitudes[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2001, 28(2): 189-201.
[29] Izard C E. Human emotions[M]. New York: Plenum, 1977.
[30] Izard C E. Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2007, 2(3): 260-280.
[31] Keller M C, Fredrickson B L, Ybarra O, et al. A warm heart and a clear head: The contingent effects of weather on mood and cognition[J]. Psychological Science, 2005, 16(9): 724-731.
[32] Kissler J, Herbert C, Peyk P, et al. Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading[J]. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(6): 475-480.
[33] Liu J M, Li C, Ji Y G, et al. Like it or not: The fortune 500s Facebook strategies to generate users' electronic word-of-mouth[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 73: 605-613.
[34] Luminet IV O, Bouts P, Delie F, et al. Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2000, 14(5): 661-688.
[35] Nielsen M I S W. Computer-mediated communication and self-awareness: A selective review[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 76: 554-560.
[36] Oh O, Kwon K H, Rao H R. An exploration of social media in extreme events: Rumor theory and Twitter during the Haiti earthquake 2010[A]. International conference on information systems, ICIS 2010[C]. Saint Louis, Missouri, USA: ICIS, 2010.
[37] Penz E, Hogg M K. The role of mixed emotions in consumer behaviour: Investigating ambivalence in consumers’ experiences of approach-avoidance conflicts in online and offline settings[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2011, 45(1-2): 104-132.
[38] Peters K, Kashima Y, Clark A. Talking about others: Emotionality and the dissemination of social information[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 39(2): 207-222.
[39] Podoynitsyna K, van der Bij H, Song M. The role of mixed emotions in the risk perception of novice and serial entrepreneurs[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(1): 115-140.
[40] Rimé B. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review[J]. Emotion Review, 2009, 1(1): 60-85.
[41] Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L. Emotions and information diffusion in social media: Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 29(4): 217-248.
[42] Tracy J L, Randles D. Four models of basic emotions: A review of Ekman and Cordaro, Izard, Levenson, and Panksepp and Watt[J]. Emotion Review, 2011, 3(4): 397-405.
[43] Tucker C E. The reach and persuasiveness of viral video ads[J]. Marketing Science, 2015, 34(2): 281-296.
[44] Watson D, Tellegen A. Issues in dimensional structure of affect — Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(5): 601-610.
[45] Wu S M, Tan C H, Kleinberg J, et al. Does bad news go away faster?[A]. Proceedings of the 5th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media[C]. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain: AAAI, 2011.
[46] Zhao J C, Dong L, Wu J J, et al. Mood Lens: An emoticon-based sentiment analysis system for Chinese tweets[A]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining[C]. Beijing, China: ACM, 2012.
Cite this article
Li Hong, Liu Feifei. A Literature Review and Prospects of Sharing of Marketing Information: Based on the Perspective of Emotions[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(9): 143-152.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES