1689 
3031ESG的价值内核与我国高质量发展等战略目标高度契合，对于推动企业实现成长具有重要意义。本文以2010—2022年智能制造企业为研究对象，探究ESG表现与智能制造企业成长之间的关系，并进一步分析其影响机制。研究发现：良好的ESG表现可以促进智能制造企业的成长，资源获取在其中起到中介作用。数字化程度在ESG表现与资源获取间的调节作用显著为负，且会弱化资源获取的中介作用。本研究还发现，ESG表现对自愿披露企业信息和非国有智能制造企业成长的促进作用更明显。本文丰富了智能制造企业成长动因的研究，不仅为智能制造企业主动承担环境责任与社会责任、改善公司治理结构、积极获取各类资源提供了理论依据，也为促进智能制造企业实现成长提供重要结论和政策启示。
ESG表现对智能制造企业成长的影响——基于一个有调节的中介模型
摘要
参考文献
1 陈冬梅, 王俐珍, 陈安霓. 数字化与战略管理理论——回顾、挑战与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5): 220-236. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0080
2 陈金亮, 赵雅欣, 林嵩. 智能制造能促进企业创新绩效吗?[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(9): 83-101. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210802.101
3 崔志伟, 刘自敏, 田露露, 等. 企业ESG表现与融资约束——基于信息披露数量与质量的再讨论[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024, (3): 155-170. DOI:10.19313/j.cnki.cn10-1223/f.20240409.001
4 郭晓川, 王延霖, 李萌萌. 数字化水平、服务化战略与企业可持续成长[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2023, 35(6): 85-98. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20220647
5 黄卓, 陶云清, 刘兆达, 等. 智能制造如何提升企业产能利用率——基于产消合一的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 40-59. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2024.0051
6 焦豪, 焦捷, 刘瑞明. 政府质量、公司治理结构与投资决策——基于世界银行企业调查数据的经验研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 33(10): 66-78. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2017.10.007
8 陆正飞, 杨德明. 商业信用: 替代性融资, 还是买方市场?[J]. 管理世界, 2011, 27(4): 6-14,45. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2011.04.003
11 王锋正, 刘曦萌. 数字化技术驱动企业战略变革机制研究——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(23): 97-106.
12 徐炜锋, 阮青松. 外部环境不确定性、企业社会资本与企业并购决策——基于资源获取视角[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(5): 214-227. DOI:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2023.05.021
13 余传鹏, 黎展锋, 林春培, 等. 数字创新网络嵌入对制造企业新产品开发绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 154-173. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2024.0058
14 余泳泽, 郭梦华, 胡山. 社会失信环境与民营企业成长——来自城市失信人的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, (9): 137-155. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.09.007
15 张永珅, 李小波, 邢铭强. 企业数字化转型与审计定价[J]. 审计研究, 2021, (3): 62-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4239.2021.03.009
16 张泽南, 夏玉洁, 张雪梅. 赋能还是负能: ESG表现与企业劳动投资效率[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(7): 69-85. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20240120.201
17 Alexopoulos I, Kounetas K, Tzelepis D. Environmental and financial performance. Is there a win-win or a win-loss situation? Evidence from the Greek manufacturing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197: 1275-1283. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.302
18 Atan R, Alam M M, Said J, et al. The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies[J]. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2018, 29(2): 182-194. DOI:10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
19 Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120. DOI:10.1177/014920639101700108
20 Bridoux F, Stoelhorst J W. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(1): 107-125. DOI:10.1002/smj.2089
21 Cai L, Hughes M, Yin M M. The relationship between resource acquisition methods and firm performance in Chinese new ventures: The intermediate effect of learning capability[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2014, 52(3): 365-389. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12039
22 Chen J, Guo Z Y, Tan L. Blockchain-based remote operation and maintenance network slicing resource transaction method for intelligent manufacturing products[J]. Computer Communications, 2024, 218: 59-71. DOI:10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.034
23 Chen S M, Song Y, Gao P. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financialoutcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 345: 118829. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829
24 Chen Y B. Integrated and intelligent manufacturing: Perspectives and enablers[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 588-595. DOI:10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.009
25 Chu H F, Wang H X, Wang Z Y. Impact of Innovation Quality on the Growth Performance of Entrepreneurial Enterprises: The Role of Knowledge Capital[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(10): 8207. DOI:10.3390/su15108207
26 Cosci S, Meliciani V, Sabato V. Relationship lending and innovation: Empirical evidence on a sample of European firms[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2016, 25(4): 335-357. DOI:10.1080/10438599.2015.1062098
27 Delmar F, Shane S. Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(12): 1165-1185. DOI:10.1002/smj.349
28 Duque-Grisales E, Aguilera-Caracuel J. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2021, 168(2): 315-334. DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
29 Farajpour F, Hassanzadeh A, Elahi S, et al. Digital supply chain blueprint via a systematic literature review[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 184: 121976. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121976
30 Halkos G, Skouloudis A. Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182: 291-300. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.022
31 Hao Y, Wu W Z. Environment, social, and governance performance and corporate financing constraints[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024, 62: 105083. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105083
32 Helfat C E, Kaul A, Ketchen D J, et al. Renewing the resource-based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(6): 1357-1390. DOI:10.1002/smj.3500
33 Jiang X, Liu H, Fey C, et al. Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, a,87: 46-57.
34 Jiang Z Y, Wang Z J, Li Z B. The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on innovation performance: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, b,203: 482-491.
35 Liu R, Zhao H F, Ren J Y. Does corporate environmental responsibility promote the improvement of corporate economic performance? —Based on the perspective of green reputation[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2023, 32(5): 4679-4697. DOI:10.15244/pjoes/168264
36 Ozdemir S, Fernandez de Arroyabe JC, Sena V, et al. Stakeholder diversity and collaborative innovation: Integrating the resource-based view with stakeholder theory[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 164: 113955. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113955
37 Ozdemir S, Kandemir D, Eng T Y, et al. Vertical stakeholder collaborations for firm innovativeness in new product development: The moderating roles of legal bonds and operational linkages[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 119: 172-184. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.014
38 Penrose E T. The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.
39 Schmuck D, Matthes J, Naderer B. Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect-reason-involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2018, 47(2): 127-145. DOI:10.1080/00913367.2018.1452652
40 Sun Y P, Gao P P, Tian W J, et al. Green innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability: Empirical analysis and policy[J]. Resources Policy, 2023, 81: 103369. DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103369
41 Tang H, Xiong L Y, Peng R. The mediating role of investor confidence on ESG performance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese listed firms[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024, 61: 104988. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2024.104988
42 Traboulsy O R. The role of resource acquisition in achieving sustainable competitive performance for SMEs in an emerging market: A moderated mediation analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(16): 12302. DOI:10.3390/su151612302
43 Wang G, Jiang X, Yuan C H, et al. Managerial ties and firm performance in an emerging economy: Tests of the mediating and moderating effects[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2013, 30(2): 537-559. DOI:10.1007/s10490-011-9254-8
44 Wei L H, Zhang X S, Yang M H, et al. Understanding the relationship between entrepreneur courage quotient and enterprises' sustainable growth[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024, 59: 104679. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104679
45 Wu K P, Fu Y M, Kong D M. Does the digital transformation of enterprises affect stock price crash risk?[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2022, a,48: 102888.
46 Wu L F, Sun L W, Chang Q, et al. How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? A multiple case study based on resource integration perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, b,184: 122019.
47 Yang Y R, Han X L, Wang X, et al. Research on executive equity incentives and corporate innovation performance: The role of corporate social responsibility[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2023, 17(5): 1014-1030. DOI:10.1108/CMS-10-2020-0447
引用本文
单标安, 刘克难, 徐雨乔, 等. ESG表现对智能制造企业成长的影响——基于一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 70-84.
导出参考文献，格式为：
