2703 
1633本文基于2008—2021年沪深A股上市公司及其两级业务关系数据构建供应链网络，考察供应链网络位置对企业ESG表现的影响。研究发现，企业越靠近供应链网络中心位置，ESG表现越好。机制检验表明，靠近供应链网络中心位置的企业，通过受到更多的外部监督、加大在创新方面的投入以及获得更多的商业信贷支持，进而促进了ESG表现。异质性检验发现，供应链网络中心位置对企业ESG表现的促进作用在国有企业、交易成本高以及市场地位高的企业中更为显著。本文研究表明供应链网络的“中心位置”带来的监督与激励促进了企业对社会责任的履行与担当。
欲戴王冠，必负其重：供应链网络中心企业的责任与担当——基于ESG视角的研究
摘要
参考文献
13 Barros V, Verga Matos P, Miranda Sarmento J, et al. M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 175: 121338. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121338
14 Bellamy M A, Dhanorkar S, Subramanian R. Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2020, 66(7-8): 895-932. DOI:10.1002/joom.1114
15 Bhandari A, Javakhadze D. Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, 43: 354-377. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.01.012
16 Borgatti S P, Li X. On social network analysis in a supply chain context[J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2009, 45(2): 5-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03166.x
17 Broadstock D C, Matousek R, Meyer M, et al. Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 119: 99-110. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014
18 Carnovale S, Rogers D S, Yeniyurt S. Broadening the perspective of supply chain finance: The performance impacts of network power and cohesion[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2019, 25(2): 134-145. DOI:10.1016/j.pursup.2018.07.007
19 Dong Y, Skowronski K, Song S N, et al. Supply base innovation and firm financial performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2020, 66(7-8): 768-796. DOI:10.1002/joom.1107
20 Gu J, Shi X Y, Wang P N, et al. Examining the impact of upstream and downstream relationship stability and concentration on firms’ financial performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 141: 229-242. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.018
21 Gualandris J, Longoni A, Luzzini D, et al. The association between supply chain structure and transparency: A large-scale empirical study[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2021, 67(7): 803-827. DOI:10.1002/joom.1150
22 Harymawan I, Nasih M, Agustia D, et al. Investment efficiency and environmental, social, and governance reporting: Perspective from corporate integration management[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2022, 29(5): 1186-1202. DOI:10.1002/csr.2263
23 Husted B W, Sousa-Filho J M D. Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 102: 220-227. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
24 Jhang S S, Su H C, Kao T W. Major customer network structure and supplier trade credit[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2021, 41(8): 1318-1349.
25 Kim D Y. Understanding supplier structural embeddedness: A social network perspective[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2014, 32(5): 219-231. DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.005
26 Kim D Y, Zhu P C. Supplier dependence and R&D intensity: The moderating role of network centrality and interconnectedness[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2018, 64(1): 7-18. DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2018.11.002
27 Lau A K W, Kajikawa Y, Sharif N. The roles of supply network centralities in firm performance and the moderating effects of reputation and export-orientation[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2020, 31(13): 1110-1127.
28 Mcbrayer G A. Does persistence explain ESG disclosure decisions?[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, 25(6): 1074-1086. DOI:10.1002/csr.1521
29 Potter A, Wilhelm M. Exploring supplier–supplier innovations within the Toyota supply network: A supply network perspective[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2020, 66(7-8): 797-819. DOI:10.1002/joom.1124
30 Song H, Lu Q, Yu K K, et al. How do knowledge spillover and access in supply chain network enhance SMEs’ credit quality?[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2019, 119(2): 274-291.
31 Yu E P Y, Guo C Q, Van Luu B. Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(7): 987-1004. DOI:10.1002/bse.2047
引用本文
张济平, 李增福. 欲戴王冠，必负其重：供应链网络中心企业的责任与担当——基于ESG视角的研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(7): 86-101.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：企业数字技术应用与创新效率提升
