909 
565绿色低碳是中国高质量发展的底色，也是中国实现增长方式转变，推动人与自然和谐发展的重要方向。然而，目前对中国绿色发展依然缺乏科学的测度，也无法了解其内在发展的底层逻辑。文章将产品绿色属性纳入技术复杂度的分析框架，基于出口产品的微观视角测度中国绿色发展水平，并分析了其在时间维度的变动趋势，进而从产品渗透以及路径依赖方面来揭示绿色发展的底层逻辑。研究发现：出口视角下，中国绿色发展呈现稳定的上升趋势；绿色产品在持续产品和新增产品两个维度的双重渗透构成了中国绿色发展的基本路径，且我国绿色渗透的主要形式为持续产品，主体为低技术产品，主要目的地为经济较发达地区，主要行业为机械电子制造业。进一步研究发现，中国绿色发展道路存在显著的路径依赖特征，且绿色路径依赖的主要影响因素为绿色技术和环境规制。根据研究结论，文章认为，未来需加大绿色产品和绿色项目的投资，同时提早做好绿色发展的技术以及路径储备，为进一步厚植高质量发展的绿色底色提供助推力。
高质量发展中的绿色底色：出口视角下绿色产品渗透与路径依赖
摘要
参考文献
相关附件
1 陈诗一. 能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J]. 经济研究,2009,(4):41−55.
2 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组. 中国工业绿色转型研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2011,(4):5−14.
3 Albino V,Balice A,Dangelico R M. Environmental strategies and green product development:An overview on sustainability-driven companies[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment,2009,18(2):83−96. DOI:10.1002/bse.638
4 Andrew D. Future liberalisation of trade in environmental goods and services:Ensuring environmental protection as well as economic benefits[M]. Paris:OECD,1999.
5 Bender S,Li K W. The changing trade and revealed comparative advantages of Asian and Latin American manufacture exports[R]. SSRN Working Paper No. 303259,2002.
6 Birol F. World Energy Outlook Special Report 2013:Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map[R]. Paris:IEA,2013. Boschma R. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification:A research agenda[J]. Regional Studies,2017,51(3):351-364.
7 Can M,Jebli M B,Brusselaers J. Exploring the impact of trading Green Technology Products on the environment:Introducing the Green Openness Index[R]. SSRN Working Paper No. 3804046,2021.
8 Coniglio N D,Vurchio D,Cantore N,et al. On the evolution of comparative advantage:Path-dependent versus path-defying changes[J]. Journal of International Economics,2021,133:103522. DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103522
9 Crespi F,Mazzanti M,Managi S. Green growth,eco-innovation and sustainable transitions[J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,2016,18(2):137−141. DOI:10.1007/s10018-016-0141-x
10 Demir C,Cergibozan R,Ari A. Environmental dimension of innovation:Time series evidence from Turkey[J]. Environ- ment,Development and Sustainability,2020,22(3):2497−2516. DOI:10.1007/s10668-018-00305-0
11 Fraccascia L,Giannoccaro I,Albino V. Green product development:What does the country product space imply?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,170:1076−1088. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.190
12 Hao L N,Umar M,Khan Z,et al. Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries:How critical the network of environmental taxes,renewable energy and human capital is?[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,752:141853. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
13 Hausmann R,Hidalgo C A,Bustos S,et al. The atlas of economic complexity:Mapping paths to prosperity[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2014.
14 Hausmann R,Hwang J,Rodrik D. What you export matters[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2007,12(1):1−25. DOI:10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
15 Jaffe A B,Palmer K. Environmental regulation and innovation:A panel data study[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1997,79(4):610−619. DOI:10.1162/003465397557196
16 Martin R,Sunley P. Path dependence and regional economic evolution[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2006,6(4):395−437. DOI:10.1093/jeg/lbl012
17 Mealy P,Teytelboym A. Economic complexity and the green economy[J]. Research Policy,2022,51(8):103948. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103948
18 Oh D H,Heshmati A. A sequential Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index:Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology[J]. Energy Economics,2010,32(6):1345−1355. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.003
19 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Towards green growth[R]. Paris:OECD,2011.
20 Paramati S R,Mo D,Huang R X. The role of financial deepening and green technology on carbon emissions:Evi- dence from major OECD economies[J]. Finance Research Letters,2021,41:101794. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794
21 Poncet S,De Waldemar F S. Export upgrading and growth:the prerequisite of domestic embeddedness[J]. World Development,2013,51(11):104−118.
22 Popp D. International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies:The effects of NO X and SO2 regulation in the US,Japan,and Germany[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2006,51(1):46−71. DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2005.04.006
23 Sauvage J. The stringency of environmental regulations and trade in environmental goods[R]. OECD Trade and Environ- ment Working Papers 2014/03,2014.
24 Solheim M C,Boschma R,Herstad S. Related variety,unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations[R]. Utrecht University,Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning,Group Economic Geography,2018.
25 The World Bank. International trade and climate change:Economic,legal,and institutional perspectives[M]. Washington:The World Bank,2007.
26 Tone K,Toloo M,Izadikhah M. A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2020,287(2):560−571. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.019
27 Vossenaar R. The APEC list of environmental goods[R]. Geneva:International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Develop- ment,2013.
28 Yii K J,Geetha C. The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia:Evidence from granger causality test[J]. Energy Procedia,2017,105:3118−3124. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.654
本论文包含如下附件：
| 序号 | 标题 | 大小 | 查看/下载 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 数据程序及代码 | 228385.8 (KB) |  |
引用本文
韩超, 岳巧钰. 高质量发展中的绿色底色：出口视角下绿色产品渗透与路径依赖[J]. 财经研究, 2024, 50(8): 4-18.
导出参考文献，格式为：
