670 
600为推动组织数字化变革，促进员工对数字化技术的采纳与使用，组织采取不同的措辞与员工就数字化转型进行沟通。为厘清员工所感知到的不同沟通措辞对其采纳数字化技术的影响，本研究从个体对变革及其意义的认知构建的理论视角出发，探讨了员工感知到的机会措辞与威胁措辞对其感知到的变革清晰度和数字化技术采纳行为的影响，同时，本研究还考察了组织外部环境动态性感知对沟通效果潜在的调节作用。为增强理论的现实性，本研究通过一项定性预研究和一项定量问卷研究来验证理论假设。研究结果表明：感知的机会措辞能显著提升个体对变革的认知清晰度，并间接增加数字化技术采纳行为；而感知的威胁措辞所带来的影响则取决于组织外部环境动态性感知。当环境动态性较高时，威胁措辞能有效提升变革清晰度、增加数字化技术采纳行为；而当环境动态性较低时，威胁措辞则会降低变革清晰度，并间接减少数字化技术采纳行为。本文为优化数字化变革中的沟通实践提供了理论指导与经验启迪。
数字化变革中的沟通措辞——机会与威胁措辞影响员工技术采纳的机制与边界条件
摘要
参考文献
1 刘燕君, 徐世勇, 张慧, 等. 爱恨交织: 上下级关系矛盾体验对员工主动性行为的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(5): 123-136.
2 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(1): 215-223.
3 周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6): 942-950.
4 Allen R B, Orlikowski W J, Gash D C. Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 1994, 12(2): 174-207. DOI:10.1145/196734.196745
5 Amis J M, Aïssaoui R. Readiness for change: An institutional perspective[J]. Journal of Change Management, 2013, 13(1): 69-95. DOI:10.1080/14697017.2013.768435
6 Anderson M H, Nichols M L. Information gathering and changes in threat and opportunity perceptions[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2007, 44(3): 367-387. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00678.x
7 Balogun J, Bartunek J M, Do B. Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(4): 960-979. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2015.0985
8 Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis[M]. American Psychological Association, 2012.
9 Brennan R L, Prediger D J. Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981, 41(3): 687-699. DOI:10.1177/001316448104100307
10 Brislin R W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[A]. Triandis H C, Berry J W. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology[M]. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1980.
11 Brockner J, Higgins E T, Low M B. Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, 19(2): 203-220. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00007-7
12 Bruning P F, Campion M A. A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(2): 499-522. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0604
13 Christensen C R, Andrews K R, Bower J L, et al. Business policy: Text and cases[M]. Homewood: Irwin, 1982.
14 Colbert A, Yee N, George G. The digital workforce and the workplace of the future[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(3): 731-739. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.4003
15 Conway E, Monks K. HR practices and commitment to change: An employee-level analysis[J]. Human Resource Management Journal, 2008, 18(1): 72-89. DOI:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00059.x
16 Cullen K L, Edwards B D, Casper W C, et al. Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2014, 29(2): 269-280. DOI:10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y
17 Dutton J E, Jackson S E. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12(1): 76-90. DOI:10.2307/257995
18 Eggers J P, Kaplan S. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(2): 461-477. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1080.0401
19 Elliot A J. The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2006, 30(2): 111-116. DOI:10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
20 Förster J, Higgins E T. How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus[J]. Psychological Science, 2005, 16(8): 631-636. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
21 Frenkel S J, Bednall T. How training and promotion opportunities, career expectations, and two dimensions of organizational justice explain discretionary work effort[J]. Human Performance, 2016, 29(1): 16-32. DOI:10.1080/08959285.2015.1120306
22 Fugate M, Soenen G. Predictors and processes related to employees’ change-related compliance and championing[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2018, 71(1): 109-132. DOI:10.1111/peps.12235
23 Gai P J, Klesse A K. Making recommendations more effective through framings: Impacts of user- versus item-based framings on recommendation click-throughs[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2019, 83(6): 61-75. DOI:10.1177/0022242919873901
24 Garg V K, Walters B A, Priem R L. Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(8): 725-744. DOI:10.1002/smj.335
25 Gioia D A, Chittipeddi K. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(6): 433-448. DOI:10.1002/smj.4250120604
26 Hough J R, White M A. Environmental dynamism and strategic decision-making rationality: An examination at the decision level[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(5): 481-489. DOI:10.1002/smj.303
27 Kanitz R, Huy Q N, Backmann J, et al. No change is an island: How interferences between change initiatives evoke inconsistencies that undermine implementation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2022, 65(2): 683-710. DOI:10.5465/amj.2019.0413
28 Kennedy M T, Fiss P C. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U. S. hospitals[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(5): 897-918. DOI:10.5465/amj.2009.44633062
29 Lanaj K, Chang C H, Johnson R E. Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2012, 138(5): 998-1034. DOI:10.1037/a0027723
30 Lee A Y, Aaker J L. Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 86(2): 205-218. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205
31 Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76(2): 149-188. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
32 Lian H, Li J, Du C, et al. Disaster or opportunity? How COVID-19-associated changes in environmental uncertainty and job insecurity relate to organizational identification and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022, 107(5): 693-706. DOI:10.1037/apl0001011
33 Lüscher L S, Lewis M W. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2): 221-240. DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
34 Maitlis S. The social processes of organizational sensemaking[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(1): 21-49. DOI:10.5465/amj.2005.15993111
35 Mishra A N, Agarwal R. Technological frames, organizational capabilities, and IT use: An empirical investigation of electronic procurement[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(2): 249-270. DOI:10.1287/isre.1080.0220
36 Nigam A, Ocasio W. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(4): 823-841. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0490
37 Oreg S, Bayazit M, Vakola M, et al. Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 nations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93(4): 935-944. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.935
38 Paine J W, Byron K, Higgins E T. Does the vision fit? How change context construal and followers’ regulatory focus influence responses to leader change visions[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2024, 35(2): 101718. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101718
39 Ratner R K, Miller D T. The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(1): 5-16. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.5
40 Reinecke J, Ansari S. Microfoundations of framing: The interactional production of collective action frames in the occupy movement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2021, 64(2): 378-408. DOI:10.5465/amj.2018.1063
41 Rostain M, Huising R. Vicarious coding: Breaching computational opacity in the digital era[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2024, 67(2): 359-381. DOI:10.5465/amj.2021.0150
42 Schneider P, Sting F J. Employees’ perspectives on digitalization-induced change: Exploring frames of industry 4.0[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2020, 6(3): 406-435.
43 Sonenshein S. We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(3): 477-512. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.51467638
44 Staw B M, Sandelands L, Dutton J E. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26(4): 501-524. DOI:10.2307/2392337
45 Steel P, König C J. Integrating theories of motivation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(4): 889-913. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.22527462
46 Tie Y, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers[J]. SAGE Open Medicine, 2019, 7: 2050312118822927.
47 Van Der Smissen S, Schalk R, Freese C. Organizational change and the psychological contract: How change influences the perceived fulfillment of obligations[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2013, 26(6): 1071-1090. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-08-2012-0118
48 Verhoef P C, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 122: 889-901. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
49 Yates J, Orlikowski W J. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(2): 299-326. DOI:10.2307/258774
引用本文
董韫韬, 汤明月, 陈晓萱. 数字化变革中的沟通措辞——机会与威胁措辞影响员工技术采纳的机制与边界条件[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(10): 135-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
