近年来,新创企业的创新问题逐渐成为创新与创业研究的焦点之一,网络结构作为影响创新的重要因素也吸引了国内外学者的关注,但网络结构的层级性却未得到足够的重视。本文将双元创新划分为探索式创新与利用式创新两个维度,突破单一网络层级的研究范式,基于408份有效样本,研究了配对层级之网络强度和网络层级之网络稳定性对双元创新与新创企业绩效关系的作用机制。实证结果表明,网络强度和网络稳定性分别正向调节双元创新与新创企业绩效间的关系。同时将网络稳定性视为网络情境变量,研究其与网络强度的交互项对双元创新与企业绩效间关系的联合调节效应并获得支持。研究结论对于新创企业利用外部社会网络关系开展创新活动、提升企业绩效和实现可持续发展具有较为重要的实践价值。
双元创新与新创企业绩效:基于多层级网络结构的交互效应模型
摘要
参考文献
4 Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 238–256. DOI:10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
6 Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H P. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 781–796. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
7 Capaldo A. Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(6): 585–608. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
8 Contractor N S, Wasserman S, Faust K. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 681–703. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.21318925
9 Gnyawali D R, Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 431–445. DOI:10.5465/amr.2001.4845820
10 Inkpen A C, Tsang E W K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1): 146–165. DOI:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
11 Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F A J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661–1674. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
12 Jin J L, Zhou K Z, Wang Y G. Exploitation and exploration in international joint ventures: Moderating effects of partner control imbalance and product similarity[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2016, 24(4): 20–38. DOI:10.1509/jim.15.0164
13 Kollmann T, Stockmann C. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38(5): 1001–1026. DOI:10.1111/etap.2014.38.issue-5
15 Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(4): 317–338. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
16 March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71–87. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
17 Rogan M, Mors M L. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(6): 1860–1877. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2014.0901
18 Schilling M A, Phelps C C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1113–1126. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624
19 Stam W, Elfring T. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(1): 97–111. DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.30744031
20 Yang Z, Zhou X M, Zhang P C. Discipline versus passion: Collectivism, centralization, and ambidextrous innovation[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2015, 32(3): 745–769. DOI:10.1007/s10490-014-9396-6
引用本文
崔月慧, 葛宝山, 董保宝. 双元创新与新创企业绩效:基于多层级网络结构的交互效应模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(8): 45-57.
导出参考文献,格式为: