Since 1994, when Oviatt and McDougall published the seminal paper Toward a Theory of International New Ventures, international new ventures have attracted more and more scholars’ research interest. International performance is an important research issue in the filed of international new ventures. A number of studies on the antecedents of international new ventures’ international performance have focused on the impact of international speed, international degree, international scope, international orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities, international business skills, and so on. Although the current literature has conducted a large number of studies on international new ventures from different perspectives, it does not answer how international new ventures gain international performance. Focusing on this research issue, we choose four new international ventures from China to conduct a longitudinal cross-cases exploratory study. By integrating the resources-based view, the strategy formulation and other perspectives, this paper eventually reveals a path mechanism of different stages of internationalization. The firm resources of international new ventures are transformed into international performance through strategies based on different formulation methods. In other words, there are two main findings in this paper: First, in the initial stage of internationalization, international new ventures face resource constraints, applying an entrepreneurial bricolage approach to form a informal strategy; international new ventures adopt the strategy based on the entrepreneurial bricolage to translate limited resources into international survival performance. Second, in the subsequent stage of internationalization, resource constraints faced by international new ventures have been alleviated, applying a planning-analytical approach to form a formal strategy; international new ventures adopt the strategy based on the planning-analytical approach to translate abundant resources into international growth performance. The research conclusions not only help to explain the international performance differences among different international new ventures, identify important intermediary factors between firm resources and international performance in different stages of internationalization, and increase our understanding of international entrepreneurship; but also have management implications for international new ventures from China to promote international performance.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
How do International New Ventures Gain International Performance?
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 09, pp. 30 - 41 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.09.003
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Wei Gu, Sun Qixin. The relationship among organizational resources, strategic proactiveness and performance—a resources-based view[J]. China Soft Science, 2014, (9):117-126.
[2] Yang Zhong, Zhang Xiao, Chen Yang, et al. Research on the drives of born global firm’s sustainable growth—a differences cross case-study of firm’s different life cycle stage[J]. Management World,2007, (6):122-136.
[3] Almodóvar P, Rugman A M. The M curve and the performance of Spanish international new ventures[J]. British Journal of Management, 2014, 25(S1): S6-S23.
[4] Bai W S, Holmström L C, Johanson M. The performance of international returnee ventures: The role of networking capability and the usefulness of international business knowledge[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2016, 28(9-10): 657-680.
[5] Baker T, Nelson R E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(3): 329-366.
[6] Cavusgil S T, Knight G. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 3-16.
[7] Desa G, Basu S. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013, 7(1): 26-49.
[8] Fernhaber S A, Li D. The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010, 34(1): 1-30.
[9] Graves C, Thomas J. Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective[J]. Family Business Review, 2006, 19(3): 207-224.
[10] Hamel G, Doz Y L, Prahalad C K. Collaborate with your competitors-and win[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1989, 67(1): 133-139.
[11] Hitt M A, Li D, Xu K. International strategy: From local to global and beyond[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(1): 58-73.
[12] Hughes M, Martin S L, Morgan R E, et al. Realizing product-market advantage in high-technology international new ventures: The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2010, 18(4): 1-21.
[13] Khavul S, Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Wood E. Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2010, 25(1): 104-119.
[14] Lu Y, Zhou L X, Bruton G, et al. Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(3): 419-436.
[15] Mudambi R, Zahra S A. The survival of international new ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(2): 333-352.
[16] Oehme M, Bort S. SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: The influence of imitation, network position, and international experience[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(6): 629-655.
[17] Ott T E, Eisenhardt K M, Bingham C B. Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2017, 11(3): 306-325.
[18] Oviatt B M, McDougall P P. Toward a theory of international new ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 25(1): 45-64.
[19] Pinho J C, Prange C. The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(3): 391-403.
[20] Qian G M, Li L, Rugman A M. Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2013, 44(6): 635-647.
[21] Rialp-Criado A, Galván-Sánchez I, Suárez-Ortega S M. A configuration-holistic approach to born-global firms’ strategy formation process[J]. European Management Journal, 2010, 28(2): 108-123.
[22] Zhou L X, Wu A Q. Earliness of internationalization and performance outcomes: Exploring the moderating effects of venture age and international commitment[J]. Journal of World Business, 2014, 49(1): 132-142.
Cite this article
Ding Zhenkuo, Ye Guangyu, Huang Sheng. How do International New Ventures Gain International Performance?[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(9): 30-41.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES