[1] Du Yushen, Liu Ziyu. Technology diversification, R&D collaboration network centrality, and enterprise innovation performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(15):74-81.
[2] Guo Wenyu, Yang Jianjun. Knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in alliances[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(11):2020-2028.
[3] Li Shengnan, Xu Min, Lin Zhouzhou. Research on the impact of international knowledge spillovers on the innovation performance of high-tech industries under the effection of R&D human capital[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2021, 18(9):1354-1362.
[4] Liu Fengchao, Luo Lei, Zhang Shuhui. Knowledge attributes, knowledge relations and firms' innovation performance in the R&D cooperation[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(11):155-163.
[5] Ren Shengce, Ma Junjie, Xu Hui. The antecedents and consequences of strategic knowledge disclosure: A case study of BGI[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(9):151-159.
[6] Yuan Yijun, Gao Kang. The synergetic agglomeration of industries, spatial knowledge spillovers and regional innovation efficiency[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(11):1966-1975, 2007.
[7] Zhou Tao, Wang Chao. A research on knowledge contribution behaviors of open source software community users[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(2):202-209.
[8] Zhu Fengyi, Gui Wenlin. Regional knowledge spillover and economic growth in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, 2022, 39(3):44-65.
[9] Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A. The decline of science in corporate R&D[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2018, 39(1): 3-32.
[10] Audretsch D B, Link A N, Van Hasselt M. Knowledge begets knowledge: University knowledge spillovers and the output of scientific papers from U. S. small business innovation research (SBIR) projects[J]. Scientometrics,2019, 121(3): 1367-1383.
[11] Bennato A R, Magazzini L. Does regulation drive international research cooperation? Evidence from the pharmaceutical sector[J]. The World Economy,2019, 42(4): 1200-1223.
[12] Bessen J, Nuvolari A. Diffusing new technology without dissipating rents: Some historical case studies of knowledge sharing[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2019, 28(2): 365-388.
[13] Blind K, Fenton A. Standard-relevant publications: Evidence, processes and influencing factors[J]. Scientometrics,2022, 127(1): 577-602.
[14] De Jong J P J, Flowers S. Free in, free out? Outbound transfer of user innovations in small UK firms[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2018, 73: 21-30.
[15] Gans J S, Murray F E, Stern S. Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge: Intellectual property and academic publication[J]. Research Policy,2017, 46(4): 820-835.
[16] Hartmann P, Henkel J. The rise of corporate science in AI: Data as a strategic resource[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries,2020, 6(3): 359-381.
[17] Hayter C S, Link A N. Why do knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms publish their innovative ideas?[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2018, 32(1): 141-155.
[18] Hsu D H, Hsu P H, Zhao Q F. Rich on paper? Chinese firms’ academic publications, patents, and market value[J]. Research Policy,2021, 50(9): 104319.
[19] Huang K G L, Geng X S, Wang H L. Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China[J]. Organization Science,2017, 28(2): 355-377.
[20] iang X, Li M, Gao S X, et al. Managing knowledge leakage in strategic alliances: The effects of trust and formal contracts[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2013, 42(6): 983-991.
[21] Johnson J P. Defensive publishing by a leading firm[J]. Information Economics and Policy,2014, 28: 15-27.
[22] Jong S, Slavova K. When publications lead to products: The open science conundrum in new product development[J]. Research Policy,2014, 43(4): 645-654.
[23] Krieger B, Pellens M, Blind K, et al. Are firms withdrawing from basic research? An analysis of firm-level publication behaviour in Germany[J]. Scientometrics,2021, 126(12): 9677-9698.
[24] Kwon S, Motohashi K. Incentive or disincentive for research data disclosure? A large-scale empirical analysis and implications for open science policy[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2021, 60: 102371.
[25] Lakner Z, Kiss A, Popp J, et al. From basic research to competitiveness: An econometric analysis of the global pharmaceutical sector[J]. Sustainability,2019, 11(11): 3125.
[26] Lampe H W, Ihl C. Released, but not lost: Motives and environments driving firms’ knowledge disclosure[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2021, 25(8): 2150089.
[27] Larivière V, Macaluso B, Mongeon P. Vanishing industries and the rising monopoly of universities in published research[J]. PLoS One,2018, 13(8): e0202120.
[28] Li Y, Youtie J, Shapira P. Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2015, 40(6): 1016-1033.
[29] Liu C C, Stuart T. Positions and rewards: The allocation of resources within a science-based entrepreneurial firm[J]. Research Policy,2014, 43(7): 1134-1143.
[30] Liu X Y, Zhu D H, Guo Y. Exploring the role of companies in scientific research: A case study of genetically modified maize[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2021, 33(4): 349-364.
[31] McManus C, Baeta Neves A A, Prata A T. Scientific publications from non-academic sectors and their impact[J]. Scientometrics,2021, 126(11): 8887-8911.
[32] Olmeda-Gómez C, Ovalle-Perandones M A, De Moya-Anegon F. Analysis of research collaboration between universities and private companies in Spain based on joint scientific publications[J]. Information Research, 2015, 20(4): paper 692.
[33] Pellens M, Malva A D. Corporate science, firm value, and vertical specialization: Evidence from the semiconductor industry[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2018, 27(3): 489-505.
[34] Peters T, Thiel J, Tucci C L. Protecting growth options in dynamic markets: The role of strategic disclosure in integrated intellectual property strategies[J]. California Management Review,2013, 55(4): 121-142.
[35] Polidoro F J, Theeke M. Getting competition down to a science: The effects of technological competition on firms' scientific publications[J]. Organization Science,2012, 23(4): 1135-1153.
[36] Ritala P, Husted K, Olander H, et al. External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: The downsides of uncontrolled openness[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2018, 22(5): 1104-1123.
[37] Sauermann H, Roach M. Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’preferences for publishing in industrial employment[J]. Research Policy,2014, 43(1): 32-47.
[38] Sauermann H, Stephan P. Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science[J]. Organization Science,2013, 24(3): 889-909.
[39] Simeth M, Cincera M. Corporate science, innovation, and firm value[J]. Management Science,2016, 62(7): 1970-1981.
[40] Simeth M, Lhuillery S. How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure?[J]. Research Policy,2015, 44(7): 1283-1295.
[41] Simeth M, Raffo J D. What makes companies pursue an open science strategy?[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(9): 1531-1543.
[42] Slavova K. When firms embrace science: University alliances and firm drug development pipeline[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2022, 39(2): 265-279.
[43] Spaeth S, Von Krogh G, He F. Perceived firm attributes and intrinsic motivation in sponsored open source software projects[J]. Information Systems Research,2015, 26(1): 224-237.
[44] Sun H P, Edziah B K, Kporsu A K, et al. Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021, 167: 120659.