, 2
4207 
5167Under the strong constraint of the goal of eliminating poverty by 2020, the results induced by the acceleration of the government’s poverty alleviation policy may not be consistent with the original intention of poverty alleviation policy formulation. We incorporate the government intervention into the framework of peasants’ rational choice in industrial poverty alleviation projects. Our purpose is to analyze the reasons for the deviation between the government’s goal of poverty alleviation and peasants’ behavior choice in industrial poverty alleviation projects. Our empirical evidence suggests that: (1) It is conducive to improve peasants’ willingness and intensity of participation when the crop selection uses the inner marginal land. (2) Because of the difference in the endowment of peasants, the government’s compulsory in increasing the project participation rate will expose poor households to greater income risks, which will result in a bigger income gap. Poor households tend to choose the traditional operation with low risk and low expected income because of their low ability to resist risks. (3) Finally, the government’s compulsory intervention reduces peasants’ sensitivity to changes in price of the land rent and the labor market. Our main conclusions are: (1) Poverty alleviation policies should expect the behavior selection mechanism of poor households. (2) Government intervention in poverty alleviation activities faces a balance between reducing transaction costs and the loss of poverty alleviation efficiency. That is, if the intervention of local governments can be restrained in order to reduce the transaction cost of economic activities, it may be Pareto improvement of the efficiency of poverty alleviation policies. Compared with the existing research, the marginal contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) We discuss the boundary of government intervention in industrial poverty alleviation policies. (2) We clarify the impact mechanism of government intervention on peasants’ withdrawal behavior in industrial poverty alleviation projects. (3) It infers the cost of government intervention in the participation rate of industrial poverty alleviation projects. The government’s compulsory intervention may reduce peasants’ sensitivity to changes in factor compensation.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
The Government’s Goal of Poverty Alleviation and the Deviation of Peasants’ Behavior Choice: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Industrial Poverty Alleviation Projects
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 45, Issue 06, pp. 29 - 41 (2019) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.06.003
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Chen X X, Shi Q H, Jiang W F. The analysis of agricultural productivity in different land scale and its evolution trend [J], Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2000, (12): 6-9. (In Chinese)
[2] Fang Z B, Chen X. Competitive selection: History, problems and solutions [J], Chinese Public Administration, 2015, (12): 6-9. (In Chinese)
[3] Jia J X, Qin C, Liu Y Z. Policy design for the intergration of “top down” and “bottom up” : An empirical analysis based on poverty alleviation rural development projects[J],Social Sciences in China, 2017, (9): 68-89. (In Chinese)
[4] Jiao C Q, Zhou F Z. “Capital to the countryside” and rural reconstruction [J], Social Sciences in China, 2016, (1): 100-116. (In Chinese)
[5] Li Z P. Capital transfer or cash transfer: Path analysis of Chinese industry precision poverty alleviation and its policy simulation [J], Journal of Finance and Economics, 2017, (4): 68-81. (In Chinese)
[6] Su X X, Wang X Q. Study on land fragmentation and grain production in the farming sector [J], China Rural Survey, 2002, (3): 22-28. (In Chinese)
[7] Tian X H, Chen L. “Land tenancy class”: The framework of land tenancy allocation [J], Management World, 2013, (9): 69-88. (In Chinese)
[8] Wang Y P, Zhou P D. An innovative exploration on the rural property rights system reform: Based on the investigation of the reform practice of the rural “Three Changes” in Liupanshui city, Guizhou province [J], Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, (1): 27-35. (In Chinese)
[9] Wang D F, Gui H. Research on the economic and social effect of large-scale land circulation—Based on the investigation of Lin village in southern Anhui province[J], Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2011, (2): 13-22. (In Chinese)
[10] Wang S G, Hu L. Industry labor concentration, industrial development and rural poverty reduction [J], Finance and Trade Research, 2014, (3): 1-5,31. (in Chinese)
[11] Xing C J. Poverty alleviation guarantee under pressurized system and government failure in governance of poverty[J], Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University（Social Sciences Edition）, 2016, (5): 65-73. (In Chinese)
[12] Zeng H P. Local government act and farmland centralized circulation—on the consequences of the capital to the countryside [J], Social Science of Beijing, 2015, (3): 22-29. (In Chinese)
[13] Zou W, Zheng H. Why don't children from poor families study: Risk, intergenerational transmission of human capital, and poverty trap [J], Economic Perspectives, 2014, (6): 16-31. (In Chinese)
[14] Zhou M H, Tao R. Market vs government: Evaluation of and reflection on China’s rural poverty reduction policies [J], International Economic Review, 2016, (6): 66-76. (In Chinese)
[15] Zhou F Z. The tournament system [J], Sociological Study, 2009, (3): 54-77. (In Chinese)
[16] Banerjee A，Duflo E. Poor economics：A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty [M]. New York：Public Affrairs, 2012: 214-217.
[17] Cheung S. The theory of share tenancy [M]. University of Chicago Press.
[18] Lin J Y. Collectivization and China’s agricultural crisis in 1959-1961[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(6): 1228−1252.
[19] Marshall A. Principles of economics [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1920: 189-195.
[20] Matsuyama K. Endogenous inequality [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67(4): 743−759.
[21] Matsuyama K. Poverty traps [A]. Macmillan P. The new palgrave dictionary of economics [M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
[22] Wan G H，Cheng E J. Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector[J]. Applied Economics, 2001,33(2): 183−194.
Cite this article
Jin Yuan, Wang Shiyao. The Government’s Goal of Poverty Alleviation and the Deviation of Peasants’ Behavior Choice: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Industrial Poverty Alleviation Projects[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(6): 29-41.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
