7550 
5908数字技术深刻地重塑了发现和利用机会的方式，利用数字力量加快社会创业发展是创业研究前沿。数字社会创业是以解决复杂社会问题为使命，将数字技术与社会创业相融合，推动社会创业机会、资源、治理和价值测量的数字化，从而更有效实现混合价值的新型创业活动。相较社会创业和数字创业，数字社会创业具有社会问题对接智能化、社会问题响应实时化、社会价值可视化以及社会创业增长指数化等核心特征。本文首次构建了包含数字社会创业内涵、过程要素及其运行机制的研究框架。该框架认为数字社会创业由数字社会创业者、数字社会公民、数字社会创业平台以及数字社会创业治理四个要素组成，形成了机会—资源智能一体化、赋能—规制孪生化、混合价值共创化和社会影响力规模化等独特运行机制。数字社会创业运行过程本质是社会创业者借助数字化手段主动进行混合价值创造，数字社会公民自下而上参与价值扩散，数字社会创业平台推动价值共享与治理完善的价值提升过程。未来数字社会创业研究迫切需要在混合价值逻辑和数字技术视域下构建整体化、情景化、问题化和情感化的研究新范式。本文研究扩展了社会创业和数字创业的研究内涵，对于推动社会创业的数字化应用也具有重要现实价值。
数字社会创业：理论框架与研究展望
摘要
参考文献
3 刘志阳, 李斌, 陈和午. 企业家精神视角下的社会创业研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, (11): 171-173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.11.015
6 Akemu O, Whiteman G, Kennedy S. Social enterprise emergence from social movement activism: The fairphone case[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2016, 53(5): 846-877. DOI:10.1111/joms.12208
7 Amit R, Han X. Value creation through novel resource configurations in a digitally enabled world[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2017, 11(3): 228-242. DOI:10.1002/sej.1256
8 Amit R, Zott C. Crafting business architecture: The antecedents of business model design[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(4): 331-350. DOI:10.1002/sej.1200
9 André K, Pache A C. From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2016, 133(4): 659-675. DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2445-8
10 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2018, 12(1): 72-95. DOI:10.1002/sej.1266
11 Bacq S, Eddleston K A. A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: How stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018, 152(3): 589-611. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1
12 Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A C, et al. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(6): 1658-1685. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0903
14 Calton J M, Werhane P H, Hartman L P, et al. Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development pyramid[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2013, 117(4): 721-733. DOI:10.1007/s10551-013-1716-0
15 de Moraes J A, de Andrade E B. Who are the citizens of the digital citizenship[J]. International Review of Information Ethics, 2015, 23: 4-19.
16 Dees J G. A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 111(3): 321-334. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
18 Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J. The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2014, 34: 81-100. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
20 Grund T, Waloszek C, Helbing D. How natural selection can create both self-and other-regarding preferences and networked minds[J]. Scientific Reports,2013, 3(1): 1480. DOI:10.1038/srep01480
21 Hanseth O, Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2010, 25(1): 1-19. DOI:10.1057/jit.2009.19
22 Hermsen S, Frost J, Renes R J, et al. Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: A critical review of current literature[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2016, 57: 61-74. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.023
23 Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(1): 52-61. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
24 Hockerts K, Wüstenhagen R. Greening goliaths versus emerging davids — theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2010, 25(5): 481-492. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005
25 Hockerts K. Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(1): 105-130. DOI:10.1111/etap.12171
26 Hsieh Y J, Wu Y J. Entrepreneurship through the platform strategy in the digital era: Insights and research opportunities[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2019, 95: 315-323. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.033
28 Isin E, Ruppert E. Being digital citizens[M]. Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
29 Kistruck G M, Beamish P W. The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2010, 34(4): 735-761. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00371.x
30 Ko W W, Liu G. Understanding the process of knowledge spillovers: Learning to become social enterprises[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(3): 263-285. DOI:10.1002/sej.1198
32 Lezaun J, Soneryd L. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics[J]. Public Understanding of Science,2007, 16(3): 279-297. DOI:10.1177/0963662507079371
33 Li L, Su F, Zhang W, et al. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective[J]. Information Systems Journal,2018, 28(6): 1129-1157. DOI:10.1111/isj.12153
34 Mair J, Sharma S. Performance measurement and social entrepreneurship[M]. Social entrepreneurship and social business. Gabler Verlag, 2012: 175-189.
36 Miller T L, Grimes M G, McMullen J S, et al. Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012, 37(4): 616-640. DOI:10.5465/amr.2010.0456
37 Mossberger K, Tolbert C J, McNeal R S. Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2007.
40 Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(6): 1029-1055. DOI:10.1111/etap.12254
41 Nambisan S. Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(2): 104-106. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.04.003
42 Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy,2019, 48(8): 103773. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
43 Orlikowski W J. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work[J]. Organization Studies,2007, 28(9): 1435-1448. DOI:10.1177/0170840607081138
44 Orlikowski W J, Scott S V. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization[J]. The Academy of Management Annals,2008, 2(1): 433-474. DOI:10.5465/19416520802211644
45 Pache A C, Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013, 56(4): 972-1001. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0405
47 Priem R L. A consumer perspective on value creation[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(1): 219-235. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.23464055
48 Saebi T, Foss N J, Linder S. Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises[J]. Journal of Management,2019, 45(1): 70-95. DOI:10.1177/0149206318793196
49 Santos F M. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 111(3): 335-351. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4
50 Schradie J. The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide[J]. Poetics,2011, 39(2): 145-168. DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
51 Srinivasan A, Venkatraman N. Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: A network-centric view[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2018, 12(1): 54-71. DOI:10.1002/sej.1272
52 Steininger D M. Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research[J]. Information Systems Journal,2019, 29(2): 363-407. DOI:10.1111/isj.12206
53 Sussan F, Acs Z J. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem[J]. Small Business Economics,2017, 49(1): 55-73. DOI:10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5
54 Symon G, Whiting R. The sociomaterial negotiation of social entrepreneurs’ meaningful work[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2019, 56(3): 655-684. DOI:10.1111/joms.12421
55 Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda[J]. Information systems research,2010, 21(4): 748-759. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0318
56 Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush A A. Research commentary: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 675-687. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0323
57 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 724-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322
58 Young D R, Lecy J D. Defining the universe of social enterprise: Competing metaphors[J]. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,2014, 25(5): 1307-1332. DOI:10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z
59 Zahra S A, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum D O, et al. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(5): 519-532. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
引用本文
刘志阳, 赵陈芳, 李斌. 数字社会创业：理论框架与研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(4): 3-18.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：战略过程中的中层管理者
