本文构建了“理论视角—定义逻辑”的混合型组织概念认知范式,基于理论视角将混合型组织本质的已有认知归纳为治理方式观、建构形式观和组织形态观,认为它们可以收敛于组织形态观;基于定义逻辑将混合型组织概念的已有界定方式归结为以“元素混合”为核心和逻辑起点的定义方法、以“特征介于”为核心和逻辑起点的定义方法,并结合二者形成基于元素混合的特征刻画法。在此基础上提出了具有包容性与解释张力的混合型组织元定义和反映混合型组织运行完整“画像”的操作性定义,以期引导人们走出混合型组织的“概念丛林”。本文对混合型组织既有的多种分类方法进行了批判性审视,建立了“元素特征组合—混合度”的混合型组织类别识别与判定框架,并聚焦于组织社会学领域的混合型组织类型,将组织的商业性与社会性两个维度、混合度阈值与类别结合起来,考虑最低混合强度要求,廓清了不同类别混合型组织所处的区域边界。
混合型组织:概念与类别再探究
摘要
参考文献
1 陈友华, 崇维祥. 混合型组织: 未来的方向[J]. 学习与探索,2017, (12): 27-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-462X.2017.12.006
3 赖丹馨, 费方域. 混合组织的合同治理机制研究[J]. 珞珈管理评论,2009, (2): 72-79.
4 肖红军. 共享价值式企业社会责任范式的反思与超越[J]. 管理世界,2020, 36(5): 87-115,133. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.05.008
7 Alexius S, Furusten S. Managing hybrid organizations: Governance, professionalism and regulation[M]. Gewerbestrasse, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
8 Alter K. Social enterprise typology. Virtue Ventures LLC, 1–31[EB/OL]. http://rinovations.edublogs.org/files/2008/07/setypology.pdf, 2007-11-27.
9 André R. Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility?[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 110(1): 133-150. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1
10 Battilana J, Besharov M, Mitzinneck B. On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research[A]. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T B, et al. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism[M]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2017.
11 Battilana J, Dorado S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(6): 1419-1440.
12 Battilana J, Lee M. Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2014, 8(1): 397-441.
13 Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A C, et al. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(6): 1658-1685.
14 Bauwens T, Huybrechts B, Dufays F. Understanding the diverse scaling strategies of social enterprises as hybrid organizations: The case of renewable energy cooperatives[J]. Organization & Environment, 2020, 33(2): 195-219.
15 Borys B, Jemison D B. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations[J]. Academy of Management Review,1989, 14(2): 234-249. DOI:10.2307/258418
16 Díaz-Correa J E, López-Navarro M Á. Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: A case study in the agricultural sector[J]. Sustainability,2018, 10(9): 3010. DOI:10.3390/su10093010
17 Doherty B, Haugh H, Lyon F. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2014, 16(4): 417-436. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12028
18 Dubb S. Community wealth building forms: What they are and how to use them at the local level[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2016, 30(2): 141-152. DOI:10.5465/amp.2015.0074
20 Greenwood R, Suddaby R. Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The big five accounting firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006, 49(1): 27-48. DOI:10.5465/amj.2006.20785498
21 Grimes M. Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010, 34(4): 763-783. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00398.x
22 Gümüsay A A, Smets M, Morris T. “God at Work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2020, 63(1): 124-154. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0481
23 Haigh N, Hoffman A J. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business[J]. Organizational Dynamics,2012, 41(2): 126-134. DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006
25 Haigh N, Walker J, Bacq S, et al. Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts, and implications[J]. California Management Review,2015, 57(3): 5-12. DOI:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.5
26 Huybrechts B, Haugh H. The roles of networks in institutionalizing new hybrid organizational forms: Insights from the European renewable energy cooperative network[J]. Organization Studies,2018, 39(8): 1085-1108. DOI:10.1177/0170840617717097
27 Jay J. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013, 56(1): 137-159. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0772
28 Joldersma C, Winter V. Strategic management in hybrid organizations[J]. Public Management Review,2002, 4(1): 83-99. DOI:10.1080/14616670110101708
29 Jolink A, Niesten E. Recent qualitative advances on hybrid organizations: Taking stock, looking ahead[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management,2012, 28(2): 149-161. DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.03.001
30 Kannothra C G, Manning S, Haigh N. How hybrids manage growth and social-business tensions in global supply chains: The case of impact sourcing[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018, 148(2): 271-290. DOI:10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4
31 Kickert W J M. Public management of hybrid organizations: Governance of quasi-autonomous executive agencies[J]. International Public Management Journal,2001, 4(2): 135-150. DOI:10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00049-6
32 Kim T Y, Shin D, Jeong Y C. Inside the “Hybrid” iron cage: Political origins of hybridization[J]. Organization Science,2016, 27(2): 428-445. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2016.1057
33 Mair J, Mayer J, Lutz E. Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations[J]. Organization Studies,2015, 36(6): 713-739. DOI:10.1177/0170840615580007
34 Mullins D, Czischke D, Van Bortel G. Exploring the meaning of hybridity and social enterprise in housing organisations[J]. Housing Studies,2012, 27(4): 405-417. DOI:10.1080/02673037.2012.689171
35 Nicholls A. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010, 34(4): 611-633. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
36 Nicolopoulou K. Social entrepreneurship between Cross-Currents: Toward a framework for theoretical restructuring of the field[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2014, 52(4): 678-702. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12130
37 Pache A C, Santos F. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands[J]. Academy of Management Review,2010, 35(3): 455-476.
38 Pache A C, Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013, 56(4): 972-1001. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0405
39 Perry J L, Rainey H G. The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy[J]. The Academy of Management Review,1988, 13(2): 182-201. DOI:10.2307/258571
40 Ponte D, Pesci C, Camussone P F. Between mission and revenue: Measuring performance in a hybrid organization[J]. Managerial Auditing Journal,2017, 32(2): 196-214. DOI:10.1108/MAJ-11-2015-1276
41 Santos F M. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 111(3): 335-351. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4
42 Schmitz B, Glänzel G. Hybrid organizations: Concept and measurement[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2016, 24(1): 18-35. DOI:10.1108/IJOA-07-2013-0690
43 Shepherd D A, Williams T A, Zhao E Y. A framework for exploring the degree of hybridity in entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2019, 33(4): 491-512. DOI:10.5465/amp.2018.0013
44 Skelcher C, Smith S R. Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits[J]. Public Administration,2015, 93(2): 433-448. DOI:10.1111/padm.12105
45 Smith W K, Besharov M L. Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2019, 64(1): 1-44. DOI:10.1177/0001839217750826
46 Vallaster C, Maon F, Lindgreen A, et al. Serving multiple masters: The role of micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities in addressing tensions in for-profit hybrid organizations[J]. Organization Studies,2021, 42(6): 911-947. DOI:10.1177/0170840619856034
47 Wolf M, Mair J. Purpose, commitment and coordination around small wins: A proactive approach to governance in integrated hybrid organizations[J]. VOLUNTAS:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,2019, 30(3): 535-548. DOI:10.1007/s11266-019-00116-5
48 Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings P D. Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2014, 57(5): 1309-1333. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0588
49 Young D R, Lecy J D. Defining the universe of social enterprise: Competing metaphors[J]. VOLUNTAS:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,2014, 25(5): 1307-1332. DOI:10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z
引用本文
肖红军, 阳镇, 商慧辰. 混合型组织:概念与类别再探究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(1): 84-104.
导出参考文献,格式为:
上一篇:社会成本、失败恐惧与创业努力