元宇宙创业组织合法性获取与管理机制——基于Spaceboo的单案例研究 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 曹正汉. 无形的观念如何塑造有形的组织对组织社会学新制度学派的一个回顾[J]. 社会,2005, (3): 207-216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8804.2005.03.011

2 陈吉栋. 超越元宇宙的法律想象: 数字身份、NFT与多元规制[J]. 法治研究,2022, (3): 43-54.

3 陈衍泰, 厉婧, 程聪, 等. 海外创新生态系统的组织合法性动态获取研究——以“一带一路”海外园区领军企业为例[J]. 管理世界,2021, 37(8): 161-179. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.08.013

4 葛建华, 汪振涛, 雷玮. 新创企业合法性研究动向与路径演变[J]. 研究与发展管理,2022, 34(2): 117-133. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20210844

5 郭全中. NFT及其未来[J]. 新闻爱好者,2021, (11): 36-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1286.2021.11.xwahz202111010

6 李新春, 叶文平, 朱沆. 牢笼的束缚与抗争: 地区关系文化与创业企业的关系战略[J]. 管理世界,2016, (10): 88-102.

7 李志刚, 宋敏, 崔连广, 等. 裂变创业企业如何跨越双重合法性门槛?——基于组织身份视角的双案例对比研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2022, 34(2): 149-163.

8 刘革平, 高楠, 胡翰林, 等. 教育元宇宙: 特征、机理及应用场景[J]. 开放教育研究,2022, 28(1): 24-33.

9 刘沐洋, 郁培丽, 杨淼. 颠覆性创新合法性动态演化研究——“滴滴出行”案例[J]. 科研管理,2022, 43(8): 21-31.

10 毛基业, 陈诚. 案例研究的理论构建: 艾森哈特的新洞见——第十届“中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2016)”会议综述[J]. 管理世界,2017, (2): 135-141.

11 王建国, 孙佳敏, 长青, 等. 组织合法性: 微观层面的理论研究与前沿分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020, 37(2): 153-160.

12 魏江, 杨洋. 跨越身份的鸿沟: 组织身份不对称与整合战略选择[J]. 管理世界,2018, 34(6): 140-156.

13 武守强, 冯云霞. 修辞视角下组织合法性的话语构建——以中国百胜和麦当劳为案例[J]. 经济管理,2018, 40(1): 92-108.

14 喻国明. 未来媒介的进化逻辑: “人的连接”的迭代、重组与升维——从“场景时代”到“元宇宙”再到“心世界”的未来[J]. 新闻界,2021, (10): 54-60.

15 曾诗钦, 霍如, 黄韬, 等. 区块链技术研究综述: 原理、进展与应用[J]. 通信学报,2020, 41(1): 134-151.

16 周冬梅, 陈雪琳, 杨俊, 等. 创业研究回顾与展望[J]. 管理世界,2020, 36(1): 206-225. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.01.017

17 Aharon D Y, Demir E, Siev S. Real returns from unreal world? Market reaction to Metaverse disclosures[J]. Research in International Business and Finance,2022, 63: 101778. DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101778

18 Aldrich H E, Fiol C M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation[J]. The Academy of Management Review,1994, 19(4): 645-670. DOI:10.2307/258740

19 Ball M. The metaverse: And how it will revolutionize everything[M]. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, a division of W. W. Norton & Company, 2022.

20 Bangara A, Freeman S, Schroder W. Legitimacy and accelerated internationalisation: An Indian perspective[J]. Journal of World Business,2012, 47(4): 623-634. DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2011.09.002

21 Becker-Blease J R, Sohl J E. New venture legitimacy: The conditions for angel investors[J]. Small Business Economics,2015, 45(4): 735-749. DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9668-7

22 Belk R, Humayun M, Brouard M. Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and Wild Markets[J]. Journal of Business Research,2022, 153: 198-205. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.031

23 Bhujel S, Rahulamathavan Y. A survey: Security, transparency, and scalability issues of NFT's and its marketplaces[J]. Sensors,2022, 22(22): 8833. DOI:10.3390/s22228833

24 Bruton G D, Ahlstrom D, Li H L. Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010, 34(3): 421-440. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x

25 Calic G, Mosakowski E. Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2016, 53(5): 738-767. DOI:10.1111/joms.12201

26 Clarke J. Revitalizing entrepreneurship: How visual symbols are used in entrepreneurial performances[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2011, 48(6): 1365-1391. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01002.x

27 Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M]. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.

28 Cornelissen J P, Clarke J S. Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures[J]. The Academy of Management Review,2010, 35(4): 539-557.

29 Deephouse D L. Does isomorphism legitimate?[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996, 39(4): 1024-1039. DOI:10.2307/256722

30 Deephouse D L. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1999, 20(2): 147-166. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<147::AID-SMJ11>3.0.CO;2-Q

31 Delmar F, Shane S. Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2004, 19(3): 385-410. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00037-5

32 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review,1983, 48(2): 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101

33 Drori I, Honig B, Sheaffer Z. The life cycle of an internet firm: Scripts, legitimacy, and identity[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2009, 33(3): 715-738. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00323.x

34 Dwivedi Y K, Hughes L, Baabdullah A M, et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2022, 66: 102542. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542

35 Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review,1989, 14(4): 532-550. DOI:10.2307/258557

36 Elsbach K D, Sutton R I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories[J]. Academy of management Journal,1992, 35(4): 699-738. DOI:10.2307/256313

37 Etzion D, Ferraro F. The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting[J]. Organization Science,2010, 21(5): 1092-1107. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0494

38 Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A. Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles[J]. The Academy of Management Review,2016, 41(3): 383-409. DOI:10.5465/amr.2013.0496

39 Fisher G, Kuratko D F, Bloodgood J M, et al. Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2017, 32(1): 52-71. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.005

40 Garud R, Schildt H A, Lant T K. Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy[J]. Organization Science,2014, 25(5): 1479-1492. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2014.0915

41 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology[J]. Organizational Research Methods,2013, 16(1): 15-31. DOI:10.1177/1094428112452151

42 Gursoy D, Malodia S, Dhir A. The metaverse in the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions[J]. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management,2022, 31(5): 527-534.

43 Homburg C, Hahn A, Bornemann T, et al. The role of chief marketing officers for venture capital funding: Endowing new ventures with marketing legitimacy[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2014, 51(5): 625-644. DOI:10.1509/jmr.11.0350

44 Karlsson T, Honig B. Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(1): 27-45. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.003

45 Khaire M. Young and no money? Never mind: The material impact of social resources on new venture growth[J]. Organization Science,2010, 21(1): 168-185. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1090.0438

46 Klöckner M, Schmidt C G, Wagner S M. When blockchain creates shareholder value: Empirical evidence from international firm announcements[J]. Production and Operations Management,2022, 31(1): 46-64. DOI:10.1111/poms.13609

47 Kraatz M S, Zajac E J. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: the causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change[J]. American sociological Review,1996, 61(5): 812-836. DOI:10.2307/2096455

48 Lee C K, Hung S C. Institutional entrepreneurship in the informal economy: China's Shan-Zhai mobile phones[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2014, 8(1): 16-36. DOI:10.1002/sej.1174

49 Lounsbury M, Glynn M A. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001, 22(6-7): 545-564. DOI:10.1002/smj.188

50 Meyer J W, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977, 83(2): 340-363. DOI:10.1086/226550

51 Mihailidis P. Spectacle and distrust: Emerging norms of digital culture[A]. Mihailidis P. Civic media literacies[M]. New York: Routledge, 2019.

52 Monrat A A, Schelén O, Andersson K. A survey of blockchain from the perspectives of applications, challenges, and opportunities[J]. IEEE Access,2019, 7: 117134-117151. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936094

53 Nagy B G, Pollack J M, Rutherford M W, et al. The influence of entrepreneurs' credentials and impression management behaviors on perceptions of new venture legitimacy[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2012, 36(5): 941-965. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00539.x

54 Nagy P, Koles B. The digital transformation of human identity: Towards a conceptual model of virtual identity in virtual worlds[J]. Convergence:The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,2014, 20(3): 276-292. DOI:10.1177/1354856514531532

55 Navis C, Glynn M A. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2010, 55(3): 439-471. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439

56 Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997, 18(9): 697-713. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C

57 Patton M Q. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation[M]. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1987.

58 Plummer L A, Allison T H, Connelly B L. Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 59(5): 1585-1604.

59 Pontikes E G. Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences' evaluations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2012, 57(1): 81-118. DOI:10.1177/0001839212446689

60 Powell W W, DiMaggio P J. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

61 Rao H. Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2004, 19(3): 359-384. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-3

62 Rawhouser H, Villanueva J, Newbert S L. Strategies and tools for entrepreneurial resource access: A cross‐disciplinary review and typology[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2017, 19(4): 473-491. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12105

63 Sine W D, David R J, Mitsuhashi H. From plan to plant: effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector[J]. Organization Science,2007, 18(4): 578-594. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300

64 Singh J V, Tucker D J, House R J. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1986, 31(2): 171-193. DOI:10.2307/2392787

65 Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 571-610. [66] Tornikoski E T, Newbert S L. Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22(2): 311-335.

66 Toygar A, Rohm C E T Jr, Zhu J. A new asset type: Digital assets[J]. Journal of International Technology and Information Management,2013, 22(4): 113.

67 Überbacher F. Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2014, 51(4): 667-698. DOI:10.1111/joms.12077

68 Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. 4th ed. California: Sage Publications, 2009.

69 Younger S, Fisher G. The exemplar enigma: New venture image formation in an emergent organizational category[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2020, 35(1): 105897. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.002

70 Yu J, Zhou J X, Wang Y G, et al. Rural entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: Reading institutional perspectives from entrepreneur stories[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2013, 51(2): 183-195. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12012

71 Zhou M, Leenders M A A M, Cong L M. Ownership in the virtual world and the implications for long-term user innovation success[J]. Technovation,2018, 78: 56-65. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.002

72 Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J]. The Academy of Management review,2002, 27(3): 414-431. DOI:10.2307/4134387