3371 
3185The Party organization embedded in the corporate governance structure and playing the leading core role has become the biggest feature of corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. The research on Party organizations and corporate governance has also become the focus of academic attention, and there have been a series of related research, but the existing research only involves the level of enterprise Party organizations, and the heterogeneity of individual Party members has not been further explored. This paper holds that Party members have very distinct individual characteristics. Party members who have been screened and assessed for a long time have high personal ability and quality, as well as high values and moral standards shaped by long-term Party member self-discipline norms and discipline regulations, which will have a sustained and far-reaching impact on their management style, decision-making standards and behavior choices. Taking the sample of state-owned listed companies from 2013 to 2018 as the research object, this paper analyzes the governance effect of enterprise Party organizations from the perspective of enterprise behavior self-discipline, draws lessons from the perspective of individual self-discipline in psychology, takes enterprise violations and involvement in judicial proceedings as the “reverse” proxy variable of enterprise behavior self-discipline, and empirically analyzes the impact of Party organizations embedded in corporate governance on enterprise behavior self-discipline. The results show that the embedding of Party organizations into corporate governance can promote enterprise behavior to be more self-discipline, which is reflected in the relatively lower possibility of enterprise violations and involvement in judicial proceedings, and this effect is mainly realized by reducing the risk of the enterprise. Further research finds that Party organizations promote enterprise behavior self-discipline not only in mandatory behaviors such as legal compliance (explicit self-discipline), but also in voluntary behaviors such as actively reducing earnings management and providing higher quality accounting information (implicit self-discipline). Institutional environment and industry regulation affect this effect. That is, the weaker the local government intervention and when the enterprise is in non-regulated industries, the greater the role of Party organizations in promoting enterprise behavior self-discipline. Compared with the existing literature, this paper may make two contributions: (1) It provides a new research perspective for the related research of enterprise behavior from the perspective of enterprise self-discipline. The existing research lacks direct discussion on enterprise behavior self-discipline. From the perspective of Party organizations embedded in corporate governance, this paper integrates and runs through the impact of three factors on enterprise behavior self-discipline: external institutional environment, corporate governance at the enterprise level and individual executives, and expands the perspective of enterprise behavior research. (2) It expands and enriches the research on corporate governance with Chinese characteristics represented by Party organizations embedded in corporate governance. This paper confirms that the values and beliefs of enterprise Party organizations and Party members will modify and optimize the behavior of senior executives with the identity of Party committee, show a higher moral standard, and then optimize enterprise behavior. The conclusion of this paper provides direct and internal evidence for the role of Party organizations in embedding corporate governance, and confirms the important value of enterprise Party organizations in improving the corporate governance of China’s state-owned enterprises.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
The Impact of Party Organization Embeddedness on Enterprise Behavior Self-discipline: Based on the Perspective of Enterprise Risk
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 43, Issue 12, pp. 19 - 34 (2021) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20211115.201
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Chen Shihua, Jiang Guangsheng, Li Weian, Wang Chunlin. Can the governance involvement of state-owned companies’ disciplinary commission effectively inhabit the managers’ private benefits? [J]. Economic Research, 2014, 49(10): 139-151.
[2] Cheng Bo, Xuan Yang, Pan Fei. The signaling effect of party organization governance in SOEs: Analysis based on auditor choice [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2017,43(3):69-80.
[3] Dong Zhiqiang, Wei Xiahai. The positive effect of communist party branch in private firms: an empirical investigation based on employee protection [J]. Economic Perspectives, 2018 (1):14-26.
[4] Li Minghui, Liu Xiaoxia, Chen Haiyan. The effect of CPC’s participation in governance on corporate tax avoidance behaviors [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020，46（3）：49-64.
[5] Liu Xuexin, Kong Xiaoxu, Wang Kai. The party organization governance and board of directors objections in Chinese state-owned firms: evidence from the resolution voting of board of directors in listed firms [J]. Management World, 2020, 36(5):136-153.
[6] Ma Lianfu, Wang Yuanfang, Shen Xiaoxiu. Research on governance effects of China’s state-owned companies’ party organization: a perspective based on “insiders control” [J]. Chinese Industrial Economy, 2012(8)：82-95.
[7] Ma Lianfu, Wang Yuanfang, Shen Xiaoxiu. State-owned companies’ party organization governance, labor redundancy and executive compensation contract [J]. Management World, 2013(5)：100-115.
[8] Ma Yong. Social culture of self-discipline, bank development and financial supervision [J]. Contemporary Economic Science, 2013,35(4):1-12.
[9] Wang Shuyang, Wu Rui, Gao Xudong. Governance participation of party organization and green behavior of private enterprises [J]. Economic Management, 2019, 41(8):42-59.
[10] Wang Yuanfang, Xu Yekun. Does military experience of managers affect corporate governance? evidence from China’s listed companies [J]. Management Review, 2020，(1):153-165.
[11] Yan Ruosen, Shi Lishan. The impact of the CPC’s organization participation in corporate governance on the recessive corruption of the executives in state owned enterprise [J]. Journal of Nankai University, 2019，(1):176-190.
[12] Zhang Xiaoliang, Wen Wen, Song Jianbo. Are scholar-type CEOs more self-disciplined? The impact of CEOs’ academic experience on executive perquisities [J]. Economic Management, 2020,42(02):106-126.
[13] Zheng Dengjin, Yuan Wei, Deng Yilu. Organization embedding and financial violation [J]. Management Review, 2020，32(8)：228-243.
[14] Bogg T, Roberts B W. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2004, 130(6): 887-919.
[15] Chang E C, Wong S M L. Political control and performance in China’s listed firms[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2004, 32(4): 617-636.
[16] Dechow P M, Sloan R G, Sweeney A P. Detecting earnings management[J]. The Accounting Review,1995, 70(2): 193-225.
[17] Duckworth A L, Seligman M E P. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents[J]. Psychological Science,2005, 16(12): 939-944.
[18] Faccio M, Marchica M T, Mura R. CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2016, 39: 193-209.
[19] Fan J P H, Wong T J, Zhang T Y. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2007, 84(2): 330-357.
[20] Feng M, Ge W L, Luo S Q, et al. Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations?[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2011, 51(1-2): 21-36.
[21] Freeman N, Muraven M. Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking[J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science,2010, 1(2): 175-181.
[22] Fudenberg D, Levine D K. A dual-self model of impulse control[J]. The American Economic Review,2006, 96(5): 1449-1476.
[23] Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes[J]. Psychological Review,1995, 102(1): 4-27.
[24] Guay W. Discussion of elections and discretionary accruals: Evidence from 2004[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2010, 48(2): 477-487.
[25] Jawahar I M, Carr D. Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2007, 22(4): 330-349.
[26] John K, Litov L, Yeung B. Corporate governance and risk-taking[J]. The Journal of Finance,2008, 63(4): 1679-1728.
[27] La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world[J]. The Journal of Finance,1999, 54(2): 471-517.
[28] Law K K F, Mills L F. Military experience and corporate tax avoidance[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2017, 22(1): 141-184.
[29] Li C, Sun L L, Ettredge M. Financial executive qualifications, financial executive turnover, and adverse SOX 404 opinions[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010, 50(1): 93-110.
[30] Li H B, Meng L S, Wang Q, et al. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2008, 87(2): 283-299.
[31] Lin J Y, Cai F, Li Z. Competition, policy burdens, and state-owned enterprise reform[J]. The American Economic Review,1998, 88(2): 422-427.
[32] Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models[J]. Sociological Methodology,1982, 13: 290-312.
[33] Zopiatis A, Constanti P. Extraversion, openness and conscientiousness: The route to transformational leadership in the hotel industry[J]. Leadership and Organization Development Journal,2012, 33(1): 86-104.
Cite this article
Wang Yuanfang, Ma Lianfu. The Impact of Party Organization Embeddedness on Enterprise Behavior Self-discipline: Based on the Perspective of Enterprise Risk[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2021, 43(12): 19-34.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES
