With the competition becoming more intense, scarcity of deposits makes it reasonable for commercial banks to increasingly depend on interbank liability. As consequence, a large amount of interbank debt flows to shadow banks through the channel of interbank investment and financial products with the motive of regulatory arbitrage, which increases interbank leverage. Previous studies have shown that the expansion of interbank asset and interbank debt has an impact on the effect of monetary policy and liquidity risks, but seldom discuss whether and how interbank leverage influences the credit risk of traditional loans. This paper puts forward that the essence of interbank leverage rising is the expansion of interbank sha- dow credit. Under the analysis on how interbank shadow credit affects the credit risk of traditional loans through the channel of financing structure, investment efficiency, regulatory evasion and risk-taking, we empirically examine the relationship between interbank leverage and the credit risk of traditional loans by means of OLS and IV/2SLS estimation, and find that the effect of interbank leverage on credit risk is negative as interbank leverage increases. However, when leverage reaches a certain level, the impact of interbank leverage on credit risk becomes positive. Furthermore, we analyze the heterogeneous effect that interbank leverage has on the credit risk of traditional loans when the size or type of banks is distinguished. By means of threshold regression and regression by group, we conclude that if taking no account of shadow credit caused by NCD, the rise of interbank leverage reduces the credit risk of the five biggest state-owned banks, city commercial banks and rural commercial banks but reinforces the credit risk of joint-stock banks; Nevertheless, when taking NCD into consideration, except that the impact of interbank leverage on the credit risk of the five biggest state-owned banks is negative, the rise of interbank leverage increases the credit risk of other banks, including joint-stock banks, city commercial banks and rural commercial banks. At last, we analyze that interbank shadow credit offsets the effect of monetary policy. The empirical results also show that the higher the level of inter- bank leverage expansion, the stronger the hedging effect of monetary policy. This paper contributes to the following aspects: Firstly, it expands the literature on how shadow credit expansion affects the liquidity risk to how it affects the traditional credit risk. Secondly, it proves that the inter- bank certificates of deposits have a significant incentive effect on the traditional credit risk of city/rural commercial banks. At the same time, it shows that MPA’s new policy will bring the interbank certificates of depo- sits into the assessment of the proportion of interbank liability to help to improve the quality of risk supervision, which is of practical significance to understand the interbank risk of city/rural commercial banks, and then to implement differentiated risk supervision strategies. Thirdly, based on the perspective of commercial banks’ interbank business, this paper explores the factors that inhibit the transmission of monetary policy, which provides a logical basis for understanding how regulatory arbitrage under the interbank channel impacts the regulation of monetary policy and thus improves the quality of monetary policy regulation.
/ Journals / Journal of Finance and Economics
Journal of Finance and Economics
LiuYuanchun, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YaoLan BaoXiaohua HuangJun, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Banking Competition, Interbank Business Expansion and Bank Credit Risk
Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 46, Issue 02, pp. 36 - 51 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.02.003
Summary
References
Summary
[1]Gu X, Cui T F, Hu Y Q, et al. The micro-mechanism of co-movement of leverages between commercial banks and enterprises under new normal[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics, 2017, (5): 46-56. (In Chinese)
[2]Guo Y, Cheng Y W, Huang Z. Monetary policy, interbank business and bank liquidity creation[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, (5): 65-81. (In Chinese)
[3]Hou X H, Li S, Li C. Inter-bank business and commercial bank liquidity creation: An empirical study based on microdata of banking industry[J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2019, (2): 88-96. (In Chinese)
[4]Jiang H, Yang L. Regulation pressure, market competition and the stability of banks: An empirical analysis based on the unbalanced panel data of 48 banks in china[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2017, (3): 45-56. (In Chinese)
[5]Li J L. Research on the impact of the scale and income structure of commercial banks on systematic risk[J]. Financial Regulation Research, 2019, (3): 39-53. (In Chinese)
[6]Li M H, Sun S, Liu L Y. The effect of monetary policy on banks’ liquidity creation: An empirical analysis based on Chinese banks[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2014, (10): 50-60. (In Chinese)
[7]Lian Y H. Risk contagion in interbank networks: An empirical study based on banking industry in China[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016, (9): 63-74. (In Chinese)
[8]Liu C, Pan Y Z. Interbank market and financial stability: Theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013, (12): 72-86. (In Chinese)
[9]Luo Z, Miu H B. Interbank assets expansion and risk-taking of commercial banks: An empirical study based on China’s banking sector[J]. Financial Regulation Research, 2013, (8): 54-65. (In Chinese)
[10]Man Y Y. Impact of income diversification and financial liberalization on the performance and risk of commercial banks[J]. Macroeconomics, 2016, (1): 130-143. (In Chinese)
[11]Pan B, Wang Q F, Yi Z H. Interbank business, liquidity fluctuation and central bank liquidity management[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, (6): 21-35. (In Chinese)
[12]Pan H Y, Xiang P C. Research into the impact of the development of shadow banking system on monetary policy from the perspective of credit rationing[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2017, (4): 47-53. (In Chinese)
[13]Shao H H, Yang J, Liao C J. Impact of interbank business on the bank lending channel of monetary transmission: Evidence from China[J]. Financial Economics Research, 2015, (2): 15-25. (In Chinese)
[14]Wang Q, Zhao Z. Pro-cyclical leverage of commercial banks from the perspective of interbank funding[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, (10): 89-105. (In Chinese)
[15]Wang Z, Zhang M, Liu S D. Evolution, potential risks and development direction of China’s shadow banking[J]. International Economic Review, 2017, (4): 128-148. (In Chinese)
[16]Wu W X, Shao X F, Wu K. An empirical study on Chinese commercial banks’ liquidity risk contagion characteristics based on time-series data of interbank loan[J]. International Business, 2016, (4): 81-92. (In Chinese)
[17]Wu G, He W. The changing structure of commercial banks’ balance sheets and the adjustment of monetary policy[J]. Financial Regulation Research, 2014, (7): 40-53. (In Chinese)
[18]Xiao Q, Ruan J N. Analysis of the impact of Chinese interbank business on monetary policy and financial stability[J]. Studies of International Finance, 2014, (3): 65-73. (In Chinese)
[19]Yin J F, Wang Z W. Shadow banking and bank's shadow[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 2013. (In Chinese)
[20]Yu B, Tian G G. Capacity governance and rebalance of debt structure: From the perspective of the relationship between trade credit and bank credit[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2018, (2): 29-43. (In Chinese)
[21]Zhai M, Wu S. City commercial banks’ interest rate risk measurement and response in the process of marketization of interest rates: A case study of Zhejiang province[J]. Research of Finance and Education, 2015, (4): 31-38. (In Chinese)
[22]Zhang X D, Yao B. A study of the risks and procyclicality of commercial bank’s interbank business[J]. Finance Forum, 2014, (4): 65-71. (In Chinese)
[23]Zhou Z Q, Gan Y, Hu Y. Inter-bank asset's characteristics and risk taking behaviors of commercial banks: Empirical research of system-GMM based on dynamic panel data of Chinese banking[J]. Studies of International Finance, 2017, (7): 66-75. (In Chinese)
[24]Bouvatier V, Lepetit L, Strobel F. Bank income smoothing, ownership concentration and the regulatory environment[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 41: 253-270.
[25]Demirgüç-Kunt A, Huizinga H. Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: Some international evidence[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 1999, 13(2): 379-408. DOI:10.1093/wber/13.2.379
[26]Dinger V, von Hagen J. Does interbank borrowing reduce bank risk?[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2009, 41(2-3): 491-506. DOI:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00217.x
[27]Gambacorta L. Inside the bank lending channel[J]. European Economic Review, 2005, 49(7): 1737-1759. DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.05.004
Cite this article
Yu Bo, Wu Hanhong. Banking Competition, Interbank Business Expansion and Bank Credit Risk[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(2): 36-51.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES