Based on the social context perspective of gender difference, this paper argues that gender difference invokes identity issues and explores the antecedents and mechanisms of identity strategies of women entrepreneurs. Identity plays an important role in understanding how women entrepreneurs position themselves in the male-dominated entrepreneurial context, so as to explain the differences both in entrepreneurial behavior and business growth among women entrepreneurs. By summarizing and extracting the existing studies on women entrepreneurs’ identity, this paper constructs the theoretical logic of “social attributes of gender difference-identity strategy-entrepreneurial behavior”, and answers the questions of how women entrepreneurs choose identity strategy and how this choice affects entrepreneurial behavior. Firstly, this paper reviews the research progress of women entrepreneurship and points out that identity is the key spot under the heterogeneous hypothesis, which is most worthy of further exploration. Secondly, we clarify the identity strategy and its formation path under the contradictory social construction norms, to be specific, women entrepreneurs choose to accept or reject gender expectations and entrepreneurial archetypes, and adopt different identity strategies based on the mechanisms of legitimacy, distinctiveness and authenticity. Thirdly, women entrepreneurs’ identity strategy can influence their entrepreneurial behaviors and decision-making through information processing and attention, which is at least reflected in opportunity identification and resource integration. Finally, some future research suggestions are put forward:(1)Pay more attention to the concrete forms of the effects of identity at different levels, and extend them to firm performance;(2)Complement the boundary conditions of the above effects from the perspectives of economy, culture and institution;(3)Trace the changes of women entrepreneurs’ identity strategies along with entrepreneurial events, and explore how women entrepreneurs construct and manage their identities dynamically. Overall, the main highlights and theoretical contributions lie in two parts: Firstly, future researches can explore the rules of women’s entrepreneurial behaviors beyond the perspective of “gender comparison”; Secondly, on the basis of gender difference context, some in-depth academic understandings are made in identity researches in entrepreneurship domain.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Identity Strategy Selection of Women Entrepreneurs and Its Behavioral Implications: Theoretical Model and Future Issues
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 12, pp. 17 - 29 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200821.402
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Li Jizhen, Zhou Jianghua, Gu Haijie. The building and reshape of female entrepreneurs legitimacy[J]. Management World, 2019, 35(6): 142-160,195.
[2] Alsos G A, Isaksen E J, Ljunggren E. New venture financing and subsequent business growth in men- and women-led businesses[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006, 30(5): 667-686.
[3] Brush C G, Carter N M, Gatewood E, et al. Clearing the hurdles: Women building high-growth businesses[M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2004.
[4] Byrne J, Fattoum S, Díaz Garcia M C. Role models and women entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial superwoman has her say[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2019, 57(1): 154-184.
[5] Chasserio S, Pailot P, Poroli C. When entrepreneurial identity meets multiple social identities: Interplays and identity work of women entrepreneurs[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,2014, 20(2): 128-154.
[6] Coleman S, Robb A. A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman firm survey data[J]. Small Business Economics,2009, 33(4): 397-411.
[7] de Bruin A, Brush C G, Welter F. Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006, 30(5): 585-593.
[8] de Bruin A, Brush C G, Welter F. Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2007, 31(3): 323-339.
[9] Díaz García M C, Welter F. Gender identities and practices: Interpreting women entrepreneurs’ narratives[J]. International Small Business Journal,2013, 31(4): 384-404.
[10] Essers C, Benschop Y. Enterprising identities: Female entrepreneurs of Moroccan or Turkish origin in the Netherlands[J]. Organization Studies,2007, 28(1): 49-69.
[11] Geiger M. A meta-analysis of the gender gap(s)in venture funding: Funder- and entrepreneur-driven perspectives[J]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights,2020, 13: e00167.
[12] Gruber M, MacMillan I C. Entrepreneurial behavior: A reconceptualization and extension based on identity theory[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2017, 11(3): 271-286.
[13] Gundry L K, Welsch H P. The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2001, 16(5): 453-470.
[14] Hechavarria D, Bullough A, Brush C, et al. High-growth women’s entrepreneurship: Fueling social and economic development[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2019, 57(1): 5-13.
[15] Hoang H, Gimeno J. Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2010, 25(1): 41-53.
[16] Jennings J E, Brush C G. Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to(and from)the broader entrepreneurship literature?[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2013, 7(1): 663-715.
[17] Kanze D, Huang L, Conley M A, et al. We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(2): 586-614.
[18] Lewis P. The search for an authentic entrepreneurial identity: Difference and professionalism among women business owners[J]. Gender, Work & Organization,2013, 20(3): 252-266.
[19] Morris M H, Miyasaki N N, Watters C E, et al. The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2006, 44(2): 221-244.
[20] Nadin S. Entrepreneurial identity in the care sector: Navigating the contradictions[J]. Women in Management Review,2007, 22(6): 456-467.
[21] Navis C, Glynn M A. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility[J]. Academy of Management Review,2011, 36(3): 479-499.
[22] Neill S, Metcalf L, York J L. Seeing what others miss: A study of women entrepreneurs in high-growth startups[J]. Entrepreneurship Research Journal,2015, 5(4): 293-322.
[23] Orser B J, Elliott C, Leck J. Feminist attributes and entrepreneurial identity[J]. Gender in Management,2011, 26(8): 561-589.
[24] Orser B J, Riding A L, Manley K. Women entrepreneurs and financial capital[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006, 30(5): 643-665.
[25] Shepherd D, Haynie J M. Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2009, 33(6): 1245-1264.
[26] Stryker S, Burke P J. The past, present and future of an identity theory[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly,2000, 63(4): 284-297.
[27] Swail J, Marlow S. “Embrace the masculine; attenuate the feminine”-gender, identity work and entrepreneurial legitimation in the nascent context[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,2018, 30(1-2): 256-282.
Cite this article
Li Fuwei, Yang Jun. Identity Strategy Selection of Women Entrepreneurs and Its Behavioral Implications: Theoretical Model and Future Issues[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(12): 17-29.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES