With the popularization of mobile terminal, the experience of human-computer interaction is catching increasing public attention. In the human-computer interaction process, the interaction between users and mechanical devices not only includes the interaction between users and the content presented by mechanical devices, but also includes the interaction between users’ actions and mechanical devices themselves. Page-turning is a basic way for users to interact with the mobile terminal, which has an important impact on users’ online experience in mobile terminal usage. According to the embodied cognition theory, this study investigates the effect of page-turning（clicking vs. sliding）on users’ online immersion intensity, verifies the mediating effect of motion fluency, and examines the moderating effect of animation visual effect consistency through three experiments. The paper confirms that different page-turning modes will affect users’ online immersion intensity in the process of using mobile terminal through three studies. Study 1 proves that different page-turning actions will affect the intensity of online immersion, and verifies the mediating role of motion fluency in this process. Sliding page-turning will make a higher degree of motion fluency, which in turn leads to a higher intensity of online immersion. Study 2 verifies the moderating effect of animation visual effect consistency, which shows that when the animation visual effect is inconsistent, sliding page-turning will lead to a higher intensity of online immersion, and motion fluency mediates this process. When the animation visual effect is consistent, no significant difference is found in the impact of sliding and clicking on users’ online immersion. The mediating effect of motion fluency is also not significant in statistics. In study 3, we add a no-animation condition to create a control group on the basis of study 2, which successfully verifies the moderating role of animation visual effect consistency and the mediating role of motion fluency again. It shows that when there is no animation or when the animation visual effect is inconsistent, sliding page-turning will lead to a higher intensity of online immersion. When the animation visual effect is consistent, different page-turning actions have no significant effect on online immersion intensity. Study 3 also demonstrates that the online immersion triggered by the consistent animation visual effect is higher than the online immersion without any animation. The online immersion generated by no animation is higher than the online immersion triggered by the inconsistent animation visual effect. This study enriches the research of the embodied cognition theory on the relationship between actions and online immersion, further deepens the intermediary mechanism and boundary conditions of page-turning actions and online immersion, and provides some practical advice for enterprises to improve users’ online immersion and online experience.
Click or Slide? Research on the Effect of Page-Turning Actions on Users’ Online Immersion Intensity
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 02, pp. 59 - 70 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20191225.001
 Chen J, Cong F, Kang F. Influential factor analysis of consumers’ online purchase behavior: A flow experience approach[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2009, 12(2): 132-140.
 Chen R, Zheng Y H, Liu W J, Mediation analysis: Principles, procedures, bootstrap methods and applications[J]. Journal of Marketing Science, 2013, 9(4): 120-135.
 Li G M, Cai W C, Guo Y. Web interactivity effects on satisfaction in E-tailing———The mediating roles of telepresence and flow[J]. Soft Science, 2016, 30(1): 115-119.
 Tao Y W, Chan B F. Evaluation method of immersion interaction design based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Machine Building & Automation, 2017, 46(5): 169-173.
 Alter A L, Oppenheimer D M. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2009, 13(3): 219-235.
 Brouillet D, Milhau A, Brouillet T. When “good” is not always right: Effect of the consequences of motor action on valence-space associations[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6: 237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00237.
 Brouillet T, Ferrier L P, Grosselin A, et al. Action compatibility effects are hedonically marked and have incidental consequences on affective judgment[J]. Emotion, 2011, 11(5): 1202-1205.
 Casasanto D. Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009, 138(3): 351-367.
 Chang C C. Examining users’ intention to continue using social network games: A flow experience perspective[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2013, 30(4): 311-321.
 Dijkstra K, Kaschak M P, Zwaan R A. Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories[J]. Cognition, 2007, 102(1): 139-149.
 Eelen J, Dewitte S, Warlop L. Situated embodied cognition: Monitoring orientation cues affects product evaluation and choice[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2013, 23(4): 424-433.
 Förster J. How body feedback influences consumers’ evaluation of products[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2004, 14(4): 416-426.
 Glenberg A M, Kaschak M P. Grounding language in action[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9(3): 558-565.
 Hayes A E, Paul M A, Beuger B, et al. Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: The roles of action fluency and eye gaze[J]. Psychological Research, 2008, 72(4): 461-472.
 Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2013.
 Hoffman D L, Novak T P. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2009, 23(1): 23-34.
 Hostetter A B. Action attenuates the effect of visibility on gesture rates[J]. Cognitive Science, 2014, 38(7): 1468-1481.
 Huang M H. Designing website attributes to induce experiential encounters[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19(4): 425-442.
 Ijzerman H, Semin G R. Temperature perceptions as a ground for social proximity[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010, 46(6): 867-873.
 Lavelli M, Majorano M. Spontaneous gesture production and lexical abilities in children with specific language impairment in a naming task[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2016, 59(4): 784-796.
 Masson-Carro I, Goudbeek M, Krahmer E. Can you handle this? The impact of object affordances on how co-speech gestures are produced[J]. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2016, 31(3): 430-440.
 Milhau A, Brouillet T, Brouillet D. Biases in evaluation of neutral words due to motor compatibility effect[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2013, 144(2): 243-249.
 Milhau A, Brouillet T, Dru V, et al. Valence activates motor fluency simulation and biases perceptual judgment[J]. Psychological Research, 2017, 81(4): 795-805.
 Niedenthal P M, Brauer M, Halberstadt J B, et al. When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 2001, 15(6): 853-864.
 Ping R M, Dhillon S, Beilock S L. Reach for what you like: The body’s role in shaping preferences[J]. Emotion Review, 2009, 1(2): 140-150.
 Preacher K J, Rucker D D, Hayes A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007, 42(1): 185-227.
 Reber R, Winkielman P, Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments[J]. Psychological Science, 1998, 9(1): 45-48.
 Schwarz N. Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2004, 14(4): 332-348.
 Susser J A, Mulligan N W. The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2015, 22(4): 1014-1019.
 Taylor S E, Pham L B, Rivkin I D, et al. Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation and coping[J]. American Psychologist, 1989, 53(4): 429-439.
 Van Noort G, Voorveld H A M, Van Reijmersdal E A. Interactivity in brand web sites: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2012, 26(4): 223-234.
 Wells G L, Petty R E. The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses[J]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1980, 1(3): 219-230.
 Williams L E, Bargh J A. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5901): 606-607.
 Winkielman P, Cacioppo J T. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(6): 989-1000.
 Yang S J, Gallo D A, Beilock S L. Embodied memory judgments: A case of motor fluency[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009, 35(5): 1359-1365.
 Yannier N, Hudson S E, Wiese E S, et al. Adding physical objects to an interactive game improves learning and enjoyment: Evidence from EarthShake[J]. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2016, 23(4): 2-31.
 Zhao X S, Lynch J G Jr, Chen Q M. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2010, 37(2): 197-206.
Cite this article
Zhang Jihua, Chen Xiaojian, Tan Ming. Click or Slide? Research on the Effect of Page-Turning Actions on Users’ Online Immersion Intensity[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(2): 59-70.
Previous: No title